Organization of goal-directed action at a high level of motor skill: the case of stone knapping in India.

We analyzed the relationship between goal achievement and execution variability in craftsmen who have acquired the highest "ultimate" skills of stone knapping. The goal of a knapping movement is defined as the vector of the final velocity of a hammer, crucial for detaching a flake and, consequently, for the shape of the final product. The execution of the movement is defined by the kinematic pattern of the arm (i.e., by the coordination between the joint angles corresponding to the seven arm degrees of freedom). The results show that (a) the direction of final velocity is very stable for all craftsmen, whereas the amount of kinetic energy transmitted to the stone was craftsman specific and (b) the kinematic pattern of the arm was strongly individual and was a reliable sign of the level of skill--the highest level was characterized by the highest flexibility of movement kinematics. We stress the importance of conducting the experiment in natural conditions for better understanding of the relationship among the purpose (the final shape of the stone), the goal, and the execution of the movement.

[1]  E. Marey.  Du mouvement dans les fonctions de la vie leçons faites au collége de France , 1868 .

[2]  N. A. Bernshteĭn.  The co-ordination and regulation of movements , 1967 .

[3]  J. Abbs,et al.  Sensorimotor actions in the control of multi-movement speech gestures , 1983, Trends in Neurosciences.

[4]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Neural, mechanical, and geometric factors subserving arm posture in humans , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[5]  K. J. Cole,et al.  Coordination of three-joint digit movements for rapid finger-thumb grasp. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  T. Flash,et al.  Moving gracefully: quantitative theories of motor coordination , 1987, Trends in Neurosciences.

[7]  J M Macpherson,et al.  Strategies that simplify the control of quadrupedal stance. II. Electromyographic activity. , 1988, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Sensorimotor representations for pointing to targets in three-dimensional space. , 1989, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  G. L. Gottlieb,et al.  Reconstruction of shifting elbow joint compliant characteristics during fast and slow movements , 1991, Neuroscience.

[10]  J. Massion.  Movement, posture and equilibrium: Interaction and coordination , 1992, Progress in Neurobiology.

[11]  Jacques Pelegrin,et al.  A framework for analysing prehistoric stone tool manufacture and a tentative application to some early stone industries , 1993 .

[12]  N. A. Borghese,et al.  Time-varying mechanical behavior of multijointed arm in man. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  P. Schopfer,et al.  Physiology of Movement , 1995 .

[14]  G. Dietrich,et al.  Skills and learning difficulties involved in stone knapping: The case of stone‐bead knapping in Khambhat, India , 1995 .

[15]  C Ghez,et al.  Proprioceptive control of interjoint coordination. , 1995, Canadian journal of physiology and pharmacology.

[16]  H. Dibble,et al.  The Effect of Hammer Mass and Velocity on Flake Mass , 1995 .

[17]  Mark L. Latash,et al.  Velocity-dependent activation of postural muscles in a simple two-joint synergy , 1995 .

[18]  M Desmurget,et al.  Postural and synergic control for three-dimensional movements of reaching and grasping. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  B. Steenbergen,et al.  Achieving Coordination in Prehension: Joint Freezing and Postural Contributions. , 1995, Journal of motor behavior.

[20]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Expert and exceptional performance: evidence of maximal adaptation to task constraints. , 1996, Annual review of psychology.

[21]  Marie-Claude Hepp-Reymond,et al.  3 – Precision Grip in Humans: Temporal and Spatial Synergies , 1996 .

[22]  M. Latash,et al.  What are “normal movements” in atypical populations? , 1996, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[23]  Mitsuo Kawato,et al.  Human arm stiffness and equilibrium-point trajectory during multi-joint movement , 1997, Biological Cybernetics.

[24]  Stephen H. Scott,et al.  Hand and joint paths during reaching movements with and without vision , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[25]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Gradual molding of the hand to object contours. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  M L Latash,et al.  On the problem of adequate language in motor control. , 1998, Motor control.

[27]  M. Latash,et al.  Force sharing among fingers as a model of the redundancy problem , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[28]  J. Massion,et al.  Forearm postural control during unloading: anticipatory changes in elbow stiffness , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[29]  E V Biryukova,et al.  Kinematics of human arm reconstructed from spatial tracking system recordings. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[30]  Gregor Schöner,et al.  Identifying the control structure of multijoint coordination during pistol shooting , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[31]  C. Prablanc,et al.  Postural invariance in three-dimensional reaching and grasping movements , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[32]  C. D. Mah.  Spatial and temporal modulation of joint stiffness during multijoint movement , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[33]  O G Meijer,et al.  Berstein's anti-reductionistic materialism: On the road towards a biology of activity (1965). , 2000, Motor control.

[34]  Valentine Roux,et al.  5. Habiletés impliquées dans la taille des perles en calcédoine : caractéristiques motrices et cognitives d’une action située complexe , 2000 .

[35]  M. Levin,et al.  Compensatory strategies for reaching in stroke. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[36]  R G Marteniuk,et al.  Evidence of motor equivalence in a pointing task involving locomotion. , 2000, Motor Control.

[37]  R A Prokopenko,et al.  Assessment of the accuracy of a human arm model with seven degrees of freedom. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[38]  D. Rosenbaum,et al.  Planning reaching and grasping movements: theoretical premises and practical implications. , 2001, Motor control.

[39]  Gregor Schöner,et al.  Goal-equivalent joint coordination in pointing: affect of vision and arm dominance. , 2002, Motor control.

[40]  B. Bussel,et al.  Motor compensation and recovery for reaching in stroke patients , 2003, Acta neurologica Scandinavica.

[41]  S. Hanneton,et al.  Redondance du membre supérieur et compensation des déficiences motrices , 2004 .

[42]  R. Johansson,et al.  Factors influencing the force control during precision grip , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[43]  J. Pelegrin,et al.  Remarks about archaeological techniques and methods of knapping : elements of a cognitive approach to stone knapping , 2005 .

[44]  Fethi Ben Ouezdou,et al.  Adjustment of the human arm viscoelastic properties to the direction of reaching , 2006, Biological Cybernetics.

[45]  I. V. Grinyagin,et al.  Kinematic and dynamic synergies of human precision-grip movements. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[46]  G. Dietrich,et al.  Stone knapping : Khambhat (India), a unique opportunity ? , 2005 .

[47]  Blandine Bril,et al.  Stone knapping : the necessary conditions for a uniquely hominin behaviour , 2005 .

[48]  Mark L. Latash,et al.  The role of kinematic redundancy in adaptation of reaching , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[49]  Agnès Roby-Brami,et al.  The organization of arm kinematic synergies : the case of stone –bead knapping in Khambhat. , 2006 .

[50]  The motor representation in pianists and string players , 2006 .

[51]  Michael T. Turvey,et al.  Dexterity and its development , 2009 .

[52]  Mécanisme et Éducation des Mouvements , .