ACTIVE VIBRATION CONTROL FOR CHATTER SUPPRESSION

The vibration absorber, in its various forms, is a well-known control strategy that reduces the forced vibratory response of structures by introducing a carefully tuned, auxiliary degree of freedom. The method is simple, effective, and widely used. Recently, investigations have focused on the use of socalled active vibration absorbers for the suppression of machine-tool chatter. These absorbers are distinguished from their passive counterparts by the incorporation of various sensors and actuators to facilitate feedback control and thereby enhance the combined system response. In this paper, we consider a device, which we call an electronic vibration absorber; it is so-called because the auxiliary degree of freedom is simply a compensator realized via an electronicanalog circuit. In this regard, the technique is similar to the positive-position-feedback control algorithm and other popular second-order-compensation schemes in the literature. First, we develop the general theory for this device. Then, we consider its application to the problem of machine-tool chatter. The plant we consider in this study is a nonlinear single-degree-offreedom, machine-tool-chatter model that is known to possess a jump-type instability. A linear analysis is performed to determine the stability lobes of the controlled system. This analysis reveals that an electronic vibration absorber can increase the limit width of cut predicted in the modelling by approximately an order of magnitude. Furthermore, analogcomputer simulation of the complete nonlinear system predicts that the jump-type instability is eliminated by application of the absorber. We present a biaxial, electronic-vibration-absorber control system

[1]  Sanjiv G. Tewani,et al.  A study of cutting process stability of a boring bar with active dynamic absorber , 1995 .

[2]  Minh Q. Phan,et al.  Robust controller designs for second-order dynamic systems - A virtual passive approach , 1992 .

[3]  S. A. Tobias Machine-tool vibration , 1965 .

[4]  S. A. Tobias,et al.  A Theory of Nonlinear Regenerative Chatter , 1974 .

[5]  Terry D. Hinnerichs,et al.  Vibration Control for Precision Manufacturing Using Piezoelectric Actuators , 1995 .

[6]  Sanjiv G. Tewani,et al.  Active optimal vibration control using dynamic absorber , 1991, Proceedings. 1991 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[7]  R N Arnold,et al.  Cutting Tools Research: Report of Subcommittee on Carbide Tools: The Mechanism of Tool Vibration in the Cutting of Steel , 1946 .

[8]  Jon R. Pratt,et al.  Terfenol-D Nonlinear Vibration Absorber , 1997, Smart Structures.

[9]  Alok Sinha,et al.  Design of an active vibration absorber , 1986 .

[10]  J. S. Lin,et al.  Nonlinear dynamics of the cutting process , 1991 .

[11]  Ali H. Nayfeh,et al.  Experimental stability of a time-delay system , 1996 .

[12]  W. Keith Belvin,et al.  Active vibration absorber for the CSI evolutionary model - Design and experimental results. [Controls Structures Interaction] , 1991 .

[13]  S. A. Tobias,et al.  Theory of finite amplitude machine tool instability , 1984 .

[14]  B. J. Stone,et al.  A stability analysis of single-point machining with varying spindle speed , 1977 .

[15]  T. K. Caughey,et al.  On the stability problem caused by finite actuator dynamics in the collocated control of large space structures , 1985 .

[16]  C. Johnson Further study of the linear regulator with disturbances--The case of vector disturbances satisfying a linear differential equation , 1970 .

[17]  Eugene Rivin,et al.  Improvement of machining conditions for slender parts by tuned dynamic stiffness of tool , 1989 .

[18]  C. D. Johnson,et al.  Accomodation of external disturbances in linear regulator and servomechanism problems , 1971 .

[19]  Hisayoshi Sato,et al.  Behavior of Self-Excited Chatter Due to Multiple Regenerative Effect , 1981 .