Chemical purity using quantitative 1H-nuclear magnetic resonance: a hierarchical Bayesian approach for traceable calibrations

Chemical purity assessment using quantitative 1H-nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy is a method based on ratio references of mass and signal intensity of the analyte species to that of chemical standards of known purity. As such, it is an example of a calculation using a known measurement equation with multiple inputs. Though multiple samples are often analyzed during purity evaluations in order to assess measurement repeatability, the uncertainty evaluation must also account for contributions from inputs to the measurement equation. Furthermore, there may be other uncertainty components inherent in the experimental design, such as independent implementation of multiple calibration standards. As such, the uncertainty evaluation is not purely bottom up (based on the measurement equation) or top down (based on the experimental design), but inherently contains elements of both. This hybrid form of uncertainty analysis is readily implemented with Bayesian statistical analysis. In this article we describe this type of analysis in detail and illustrate it using data from an evaluation of chemical purity and its uncertainty for a folic acid material.

[1]  P. Hewson Bayesian Data Analysis 3rd edn A. Gelman, J. B. Carlin, H. S. Stern, D. B. Dunson, A. Vehtari and D. B. Rubin, 2013 Boca Raton, Chapman and Hall–CRC 676 pp., £44.99 ISBN 1‐439‐84095‐4 , 2015 .

[2]  T. Saito,et al.  A new traceability scheme for the development of international system-traceable persistent organic pollutant reference materials by quantitative nuclear magnetic resonance , 2009 .

[3]  F. Malz,et al.  Validation of quantitative NMR. , 2005, Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis.

[4]  J. Hook,et al.  Dimethylsulfone as a universal standard for analysis of organics by QNMR , 2004 .

[5]  U. Holzgrabe,et al.  Quantitative NMR spectroscopy--applications in drug analysis. , 2005, Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis.

[6]  F. Malz,et al.  Structure analytical methods for quantitative reference applications , 2005 .

[7]  D. B. Hibbert,et al.  An uncertainty budget for the determination of the purity of glyphosate by quantitative nuclear magnetic resonance (QNMR) spectroscopy , 2004 .

[8]  Andrew Thomas,et al.  The BUGS project: Evolution, critique and future directions , 2009, Statistics in medicine.

[9]  B. Toman,et al.  Metrological approaches to organic chemical purity: primary reference materials for vitamin D metabolites , 2015, Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry.

[10]  T. Quinn Primary methods of measurement and primary standards , 1997 .

[11]  Aleš Fajgelj,et al.  Metrological traceability of measurement results in chemistry: Concepts and implementation (IUPAC Technical Report) , 2011 .

[12]  T. Schoenberger Determination of standard sample purity using the high-precision 1H-NMR process , 2012, Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry.

[13]  A. Rück,et al.  Using high-performance quantitative NMR (HP-qNMR®) for certifying traceable and highly accurate purity values of organic reference materials with uncertainties <0.1 % , 2013, Accreditation and Quality Assurance.

[14]  Santosh Kumar Bharti,et al.  Quantitative 1H NMR spectroscopy , 2012 .

[15]  G. Pauli,et al.  qNMR--a versatile concept for the validation of natural product reference compounds. , 2001, Phytochemical analysis : PCA.

[16]  Blaza Toman,et al.  Laboratory effects models for interlaboratory comparisons , 2009 .

[17]  Blaza Toman,et al.  Bayesian Approaches to Calculating a Reference Value in Key Comparison Experiments , 2007, Technometrics.

[18]  Blaza Toman,et al.  Assessment of measurement uncertainty via observation equations , 2007 .