System analysis, modelling and control with polytopic linear models

This research investigates the suitability of Polytopic Linear Models (PLMs) for the analysis, modelling and control of a class of nonlinear dynamical systems. The PLM structure is introduced as an approximate and alternative description of nonlinear dynamical systems for the benefit of system analysis and controller design. The model structure possesses three properties that we would like to exploit. Firstly, a PLM is build upon a number of linear models, each one of which describes the system locally within a so-called operating regime. If these models are combined in an appropriate way, that is by taking operating point dependent convex combinations of parameter values that belong to the different linear models, then a PLM will result. Consequently, the parameter values of a PLM vary within a polytope, and the vertices of this polytope are the parameter values that belong to the different linear models. A PLM owes its name to this feature. Accordingly, a PLM can be interpreted on the basis of a regime decomposition. Secondly, since a PLM is based on several linear models, it is possible to describe the nonlinear system more globally compared to only a single linear model. Thirdly, it is demonstrated that, under the appropriate conditions, nonlinear systems can be approximated arbitrary close by a PLM, parametrized with a finite number of parameters. There will be given an upper bound for the number of required parameters, that is sufficient to achieve the prescribed desired accuracy of the approximation. An important motivation for considering PLMs rests on its structural similarities with linear models. Linear systems are well understood, and the accompanying system and control theory is well developed. Whether or not the control related system properties such as stability, controllability etcetera, are fulfilled, can be demonstrated by means of (often relatively simple) mathematical manipulations on the linear system’s parameterization. Controller design can often be automated and founded on the parameterization and the control objective. Think of control laws based on stability, optimality and so on. For nonlinear systems this is only partly the case, and therefore further development of system and control theory is of major importance. In view of the similarities between a linear model and a PLM, the expectation exists that one can benefit from (results and concepts of) the well developed linear system and control theory. This hypothesis is partly confirmed by the results of this study. Under the appropriate conditions, and through a simple analysis of the parametrization of a PLM, it is possible to establish from a control perspective relevant system properties. One of these properties is stability. Under the appropriate conditions stability of the PLM implies stability of the system. Moreover, a few easy to check conditions are derived concerning the notion of controllability and observability. It has to be noticed however, that these conditions apply to a class of PLMs of which the structure is further restricted. The determination of system properties from a PLM is done with the intention to derive a suitable model, and in particular to design a model based controller. This study describes several constructive methods that aim at building a PLM representation of the real system. On the basis of a PLM several control laws are formulated. The main objective of these control laws is to stabilize the system in a desired operating point. A few computerized stabilizing control designs, that additionally aim at optimality or robustness, are the outcome of this research. The entire route of representing a system with an approximate PLM, subsequently analyzing the PLM, and finally controlling the system by a PLM based control design is illustrated by means of several examples. These examples include experimental as well as simulation studies, and nonlinear dynamic (mechanical) systems are the subject of research.

[1]  Ioannis Kanellakopoulos Advances in adaptive nonlinear control , 1996 .

[2]  Eduardo D. Sontag,et al.  Mathematical Control Theory: Deterministic Finite Dimensional Systems , 1990 .

[3]  M. Griffin,et al.  An analytical framework of fuzzy modeling and control of nonlinear systems: stability and design issues , 1995, Proceedings of 1995 American Control Conference - ACC'95.

[4]  Clarence W. de Silva,et al.  Tracking control of an electrohydraulic manipulator in the presence of friction , 1998, IEEE Trans. Control. Syst. Technol..

[5]  Roderick Murray-Smith,et al.  A local model network approach to nonlinear modelling , 1994 .

[6]  Tor Arne Johansen,et al.  State-Space Modeling using Operating Regime Decomposition and Local Models , 1993 .

[7]  Masayoshi Tomizuka,et al.  Robust motion controller design for high-accuracy positioning systems , 1996, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron..

[8]  S. Hyakin,et al.  Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation , 1994 .

[9]  Y. Pyatnitskiy,et al.  Criteria of asymptotic stability of differential and difference inclusions encountered in control theory , 1989 .

[10]  Anders Rantzer,et al.  Piecewise linear quadratic optimal control , 1997, Proceedings of the 1997 American Control Conference (Cat. No.97CH36041).

[11]  Kazuo Tanaka,et al.  An approach to fuzzy control of nonlinear systems: stability and design issues , 1996, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst..

[12]  Hgl Rick Tebbens Polytopic Linear Modeling of nonlinear mechanical systems:a data based P.L.M. generating method , 1999 .

[13]  T. Johansen,et al.  A NARMAX model representation for adaptive control based on local models , 1992 .

[14]  W. Baumann,et al.  Feedback control of nonlinear systems by extended linearization , 1986 .

[15]  Roderick Murray-Smith,et al.  Multiple Model Approaches to Modelling and Control , 1997 .

[17]  van de M.J.G. Molengraft,et al.  Adaptive optimal friction control based on a polytopic linear model , 2000 .

[18]  Lennart Ljung,et al.  System Identification: Theory for the User , 1987 .

[19]  F. Girosi,et al.  On the Relationship between Generalization Error , Hypothesis NG 1879 Complexity , and Sample Complexity for Radial Basis Functions N 00014-92-J-1879 6 , 2022 .

[20]  Federico Girosi,et al.  On the Relationship between Generalization Error, Hypothesis Complexity, and Sample Complexity for Radial Basis Functions , 1996, Neural Computation.

[21]  M.J.G. van de Molengraft,et al.  Modeling and optimal estimation of mixtures; a simulation study , 1996 .

[22]  Richard F. Gunst,et al.  Applied Regression Analysis , 1999, Technometrics.

[23]  René van de Molengraft,et al.  Robust controller design and performance for polytopic models , 1999, 1999 European Control Conference (ECC).

[24]  Stephen A. Billings,et al.  Model validation tests for multivariable nonlinear models including neural networks , 1995 .

[25]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Quadratic stabilization and control of piecewise-linear systems , 1998, Proceedings of the 1998 American Control Conference. ACC (IEEE Cat. No.98CH36207).

[26]  A.H. Haddad,et al.  Applied optimal estimation , 1976, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[27]  Oliver Nelles,et al.  Local linear model trees (LOLIMOT) for nonlinear system identification of a cooling blast , 1996 .

[28]  Karl Johan Åström Design Methods of Control Systems , 1991 .

[29]  M. Johansson,et al.  Piecewise Linear Control Systems , 2003 .

[30]  M. MendelJ.,et al.  Fuzzy basis functions , 1995 .

[31]  M. Kisielewicz Differential Inclusions and Optimal Control , 1991 .

[32]  Isaac Horowitz,et al.  Extensions of dithered feedback systems , 1991 .

[33]  T. A. Johansen,et al.  On the optimality of the Takagi-Sugeno-Kang fuzzy inference mechanism , 1995, Proceedings of 1995 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems..

[34]  C. Scherer,et al.  Lecture Notes DISC Course on Linear Matrix Inequalities in Control , 1999 .

[35]  D. Luenberger Optimization by Vector Space Methods , 1968 .

[36]  Magdi S. Mahmoud,et al.  Large scale systems modelling , 1981 .

[37]  T. Johansen,et al.  Constructing NARMAX models using ARMAX models , 1993 .

[38]  Pravin Varaiya,et al.  Epsilon-Approximation of Differential Inclusions , 1996, Hybrid Systems.

[39]  L. Wittgenstein,et al.  Nonlinear Modeling, Optimal Estimation and Friction , 1998 .

[40]  M. Jamshidi Large-Scale Systems: Modeling, Control and Fuzzy Logic , 1996 .

[41]  Michio Sugeno,et al.  Fuzzy identification of systems and its applications to modeling and control , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[42]  W. Wonham,et al.  Topics in mathematical system theory , 1972, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[43]  M. Sugeno,et al.  Structure identification of fuzzy model , 1988 .

[44]  M.J.G. van de Molengraft,et al.  Polytopic linear modelling of a class of nonlinear systems : an automated model generating method , 2000 .

[45]  Fe Frans Veldpaus,et al.  An optimal estimation method for nonlinear models of mechanical systems , 1994 .

[46]  Tor Arne Johansen,et al.  Operating regime based process modeling and identification , 1997 .

[47]  T. Westerlund,et al.  Remarks on "Asymptotic behavior of the extended Kalman filter as a parameter estimator for linear systems" , 1980 .

[48]  L X Wang,et al.  Fuzzy basis functions, universal approximation, and orthogonal least-squares learning , 1992, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[49]  George W. Irwin,et al.  Multi-layer perceptron based modelling of nonlinear systems , 1996, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[50]  A I Bulgakov,et al.  Approximation of differential inclusions , 2002 .

[51]  Carlos Canudas de Wit,et al.  Friction Models and Friction Compensation , 1998, Eur. J. Control.

[52]  M.J.G. van de Molengraft,et al.  Identification of non-linear mechanical systems : for control application , 1990 .

[53]  A. G. de Jager,et al.  Grey-box modeling of friction: An experimental case-study , 1999 .

[54]  P.P.J. van den Bosch,et al.  Modeling, identification, and simulation of dynamical systems , 1994 .

[55]  L. Perko Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems , 1991 .

[56]  R.D. Lorenz,et al.  Experimental identification of friction and its compensation in precise, position controlled mechanisms , 1991, Conference Record of the 1991 IEEE Industry Applications Society Annual Meeting.

[57]  Michel Verhaegen,et al.  Identification and parameter estimation techniques; a review , 1995 .

[58]  P. Philips,et al.  Piecewise-constant control for systems with discrete measurements , 1999, Proceedings of the 1999 American Control Conference (Cat. No. 99CH36251).

[59]  Carlos Canudas de Wit,et al.  A survey of models, analysis tools and compensation methods for the control of machines with friction , 1994, Autom..

[60]  E. Yaz Linear Matrix Inequalities In System And Control Theory , 1998, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[61]  H. Nijmeijer,et al.  Optimal polytopic control system design , 2000, Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE International Symposium on Intelligent Control. Held jointly with the 8th IEEE Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation (Cat. No.00CH37147).

[62]  Lennart Ljung From data to model: a guided tour , 1994 .

[63]  Arjan van der Schaft,et al.  Non-linear dynamical control systems , 1990 .

[64]  Chein-Chung Sun,et al.  Fuzzy control with common observability Gramian assignment for continuous Takagi-Sugeno models , 1999, Proceedings of the 1999 American Control Conference (Cat. No. 99CH36251).

[65]  Kurt Hornik,et al.  Universal approximation of an unknown mapping and its derivatives using multilayer feedforward networks , 1990, Neural Networks.

[66]  Bengt Lennartson,et al.  An LMI approach for stability analysis of nonlinear systems , 1997, 1997 European Control Conference (ECC).

[67]  D. Signorini,et al.  Neural networks , 1995, The Lancet.