Two Case Studies in Phonological Universals: A View from Artificial Grammars

This article summarizes the results of two experiments that use artificial grammar learning in order to test proposed phonological universals. The first universal involves limits on precedence-modification in phonological representations, drawn from a typology of ludlings (language games). It is found that certain unattested precedence-modifying operations in ludlings are also dispreferred in learning in experimental studies, suggesting that the typological gap reflects a principled and universal aspect of language structure. The second universal involves differences between vowels and consonants, and in particular, the fact that phonological typology finds vowel repetition and harmony to be widespread, while consonants are more likely to dissimilate. An artificial grammar task replicates this bias in the laboratory, suggesting that its presence in natural languages is not due to historical accident but to cognitive constraints on the form of linguistic grammars.

[1]  W. Dowling,et al.  Contour, interval, and pitch recognition in memory for melodies. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  Marc D. Hauser,et al.  The possibility of impossible cultures , 2009, Nature.

[3]  T. Nazzi,et al.  Bias for consonantal information over vocalic information in 30-month-olds: cross-linguistic evidence from French and English. , 2009, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[4]  Thierry Dutoit,et al.  The MBROLA project: towards a set of high quality speech synthesizers free of use for non commercial purposes , 1996, Proceeding of Fourth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing. ICSLP '96.

[5]  Robert V Farese,et al.  Speech Perception in Infants , 1971 .

[6]  N. Sebastián-Gallés,et al.  Constraints of vowels and consonants on lexical selection: Cross-linguistic comparisons , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[7]  P. Kuhl.  Human adults and human infants show a “perceptual magnet effect” for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[8]  M. Maybery,et al.  Grouping in short-term verbal memory: Is position coded temporally? , 2002, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[9]  M. Plénat,et al.  Une approche prosodique de la morphologie du verlan , 1995 .

[10]  Simon Kirby,et al.  Cumulative cultural evolution in the laboratory: An experimental approach to the origins of structure in human language , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  Soumen Chakrabarti.  Date $date$ , 1962 .

[12]  Peter R. Grant,et al.  Bmp4 and Morphological Variation of Beaks in Darwin's Finches , 2004, Science.

[13]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The boundaries of Babel , 2008 .

[14]  Keiichiro Suzuki,et al.  A typological investigation of dissimilation , 1998 .

[15]  Andrew Nevins,et al.  The Edge of Order: Analytic Bias in Ludlings , 2007 .

[16]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Lectures on Government and Binding , 1981 .

[17]  Massimo Piattelli-Palmarini,et al.  Language as a natural object – linguistics as a natural science , 2005 .

[18]  Ianthi Maria Tsimpli,et al.  The mind of a savant: Language learning and modularity. , 1997 .

[19]  D T Hakes,et al.  Generalization of serial position in rote serial learning. , 1955, Journal of experimental psychology.

[20]  J. Kegl.  Creation through contact : Sign language emergence and sign language change in Nicaragua , 1999 .

[21]  N. Burgess,et al.  Temporal Grouping Effects in Immediate Recall: A Working Memory Analysis , 1996 .

[22]  John J. Ohala,et al.  Consumer's guide to evidence in phonology , 1986, Phonology.

[23]  Robert K. Young,et al.  Generalization of serial position in rote serial learning. , 1966, Journal of experimental psychology.

[24]  Jacques Mehler,et al.  The role of salience in the extraction of algebraic rules. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[25]  Edith A. Moravcsik,et al.  Universals of human language , 1978 .

[26]  C. Büchel,et al.  Broca's area and the language instinct , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[27]  P. Niyogi,et al.  Quantifying the functional load of phonemic oppositions, distinctive features, and suprasegmentals , 2006 .

[28]  R. Henson.  Short-Term Memory for Serial Order: The Start-End Model , 1998, Cognitive Psychology.

[29]  Michael J Owren,et al.  The relative roles of vowels and consonants in discriminating talker identity versus word meaning. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  P. Smolensky,et al.  Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar , 2004 .

[31]  Marcela Peña,et al.  ON THE DIFFERENT ROLES OF VOWELS AND CONSONANTS IN SPEECH PROCESSING AND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION , 2003 .

[32]  Bruce Bagemihl,et al.  The crossing constraint and ‘backwards languages’ , 1989 .

[33]  Mary Ann Walter,et al.  Repetition Avoidance in Human Language , 2007 .

[34]  R. Conrad.  Serial order intrusions in immediate memory. , 1960, British journal of psychology.