Construct Validity of a Mammography Processes of Change Scale and Invariance by Stage of Change

The development and use of validated processes of change (POC) measures have received little attention in the literature despite their importance in the Transtheoretical Model. Using survey data (N = 2909), we examined the construct validity of a 22-item mammography POC scale by testing for factorial validity and factorial invariance across stage of change. We also used MANOVA with Tukey post-hoc tests to confirm stage differences in POC use (concurrent validity). Our results confirm the a priori correlated four-factor structure of this scale and provide some support for the measurement equivalence of this scale across stage, supporting comparisons of POC use across stage.

[1]  J. Prochaska,et al.  Self-change and therapy change of smoking behavior: a comparison of processes of change in cessation and maintenance. , 1982, Addictive behaviors.

[2]  Troy Adams,et al.  Applying the transtheoretical model to cancer screening behavior. , 2005, American journal of health behavior.

[3]  W. P. Evans,et al.  American Cancer Society Guidelines for Breast Cancer Screening: Update 2003 , 2003, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[4]  Carlo C. DiClemente,et al.  Addiction and Change : How Addictions Develop and Addicted People Recover , 2006 .

[5]  U. G. Dailey Cancer,Facts and Figures about. , 2022, Journal of the National Medical Association.

[6]  D. Bowen,et al.  Preliminary evaluation of the processes of changing to a low-fat diet , 1994 .

[7]  C C DiClemente,et al.  Gender and smoking cessation: a factor structure comparison of processes of change. , 1996, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[8]  R. MacCallum,et al.  Applications of structural equation modeling in psychological research. , 2000, Annual review of psychology.

[9]  Maria E Fernandez,et al.  Validation of scales measuring attitudes and norms related to mammography screening in women veterans. , 2005, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[10]  W F Velicer,et al.  The process of smoking cessation: an analysis of precontemplation, contemplation, and preparation stages of change. , 1991, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[11]  Craig K. Enders,et al.  The Relative Performance of Full Information Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Missing Data in Structural Equation Models , 2001 .

[12]  W F Velicer,et al.  Measuring processes of change: applications to the cessation of smoking. , 1988, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[13]  Rex B. Kline,et al.  Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling , 1998 .

[14]  Jasmin A. Tiro,et al.  Promoting regular mammography screening I. A systematic assessment of validity in a randomized trial. , 2009, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[15]  W. Rakowski,et al.  Assessing elements of women's decisions about mammography. , 1992, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[16]  R. Hoyle Structural equation modeling: concepts, issues, and applications , 1997 .

[17]  D. Abrams,et al.  The stages and processes of exercise adoption and maintenance in a worksite sample. , 1992, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[18]  S. Woolf,et al.  Breast Cancer Screening: A Summary of the Evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force , 2002, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[19]  J. Prochaska,et al.  Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: toward an integrative model of change. , 1983, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[20]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[21]  W. Rakowski,et al.  Considerations for extending the transtheoretical model of behavior change to screening mammography , 1996 .

[22]  Maria E Fernandez,et al.  Promoting regular mammography screening II. Results from a randomized controlled trial in US women veterans. , 2008, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[23]  Jasmin A. Tiro,et al.  Reported drop in mammography , 2007, Cancer.

[24]  V. Champion,et al.  Measuring Mammography and Breast Cancer Beliefs in African American Women , 2008, Journal of health psychology.

[25]  S. Gregorich Do Self-Report Instruments Allow Meaningful Comparisons Across Diverse Population Groups?: Testing Measurement Invariance Using the Confirmatory Factor Analysis Framework , 2006, Medical care.

[26]  R. Vandenberg,et al.  A Review and Synthesis of the Measurement Invariance Literature: Suggestions, Practices, and Recommendations for Organizational Research , 2000 .

[27]  J. Hallam,et al.  The Use of the Processes of Change across the Exercise Stages of Change and across Varying Intensities and Frequencies of Exercise Behavior , 2007, American journal of health promotion : AJHP.

[28]  W. Rakowski,et al.  Screening mammography and constructs from the transtheoretical model: Associations using two definitions of the stages-of-adoption , 1996, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[29]  H W Marsh,et al.  Is More Ever Too Much? The Number of Indicators per Factor in Confirmatory Factor Analysis. , 1998, Multivariate behavioral research.

[30]  W F Velicer,et al.  Increasing mammography among women aged 40-74 by use of a stage-matched, tailored intervention. , 1998, Preventive medicine.

[31]  W F Velicer,et al.  Applying the transtheoretical model to a representative sample of smokers. , 1995, Addictive behaviors.

[32]  M. Clark,et al.  Repeat mammography: Prevalence estimates and considerations for assessment , 2003, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[33]  M. C. Hill,et al.  Evaluating Model Fit , 2005 .

[34]  U. Menon,et al.  Comparisons of tailored mammography interventions at two months postintervention , 2002, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.