A Neuro-ontology for the neurological examination

Background The use of clinical data in electronic health records for machine-learning or data analytics depends on the conversion of free text into machine-readable codes. We have examined the feasibility of capturing the neurological examination as machine-readable codes based on UMLS Metathesaurus concepts. Methods We created a target ontology for capturing the neurological examination using 1100 concepts from the UMLS Metathesaurus. We created a dataset of 2386 test-phrases based on 419 published neurological cases. We then mapped the test-phrases to the target ontology. Results We were able to map all of the 2386 test-phrases to 601 unique UMLS concepts. A neurological examination ontology with 1100 concepts has sufficient breadth and depth of coverage to encode all of the neurologic concepts derived from the 419 test cases. Using only pre-coordinated concepts, component ontologies of the UMLS, such as HPO, SNOMED CT, and OMIM, do not have adequate depth and breadth of coverage to encode the complexity of the neurological examination. Conclusion An ontology based on a subset of UMLS has sufficient breadth and depth of coverage to convert deficits from the neurological examination into machine-readable codes using pre-coordinated concepts. The use of a small subset of UMLS concepts for a neurological examination ontology offers the advantage of improved manageability as well as the opportunity to curate the hierarchy and subsumption relationships.

[1]  Alan R. Aronson,et al.  An overview of MetaMap: historical perspective and recent advances , 2010, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[2]  Ted Pedersen,et al.  UMLS-Interface and UMLS-Similarity : Open Source Software for Measuring Paths and Semantic Similarity , 2009, AMIA.

[3]  Mark A Musen,et al.  Using the wisdom of the crowds to find critical errors in biomedical ontologies: a study of SNOMED CT , 2015, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[4]  Sam Brandt,et al.  Getting the foot out of the pelvis: modeling problems affecting use of SNOMED CT hierarchies in practical applications , 2011, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[5]  Olivier Bodenreider,et al.  The Unified Medical Language System (UMLS): integrating biomedical terminology , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[6]  E. Simpson,et al.  Case Files Neurology , 2007 .

[7]  Hilde van der Togt,et al.  Publisher's Note , 2003, J. Netw. Comput. Appl..

[8]  Sherry‐Ann Brown.  Patient Similarity: Emerging Concepts in Systems and Precision Medicine , 2016, Front. Physiol..

[9]  Yang Liu,et al.  Ease of adoption of clinical natural language processing software: An evaluation of five systems , 2015, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[10]  Viju Raghupathi,et al.  Big data analytics in healthcare: promise and potential , 2014, Health Information Science and Systems.

[11]  Stephan Dreiseitl,et al.  Using concept hierarchies to improve calculation of patient similarity , 2016, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[12]  Christian Blaschke,et al.  Status of text-mining techniques applied to biomedical text. , 2006, Drug discovery today.

[13]  Sylvie Ratté,et al.  Comparison of MetaMap and cTAKES for entity extraction in clinical notes , 2018, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making.

[14]  Christopher G. Chute,et al.  BioPortal: ontologies and integrated data resources at the click of a mouse , 2009, Nucleic Acids Res..

[15]  Martha Palmer,et al.  Verb Semantics and Lexical Selection , 1994, ACL.

[16]  Michael Lawley,et al.  Ontoserver: a syndicated terminology server , 2018, Journal of Biomedical Semantics.

[17]  Huilong Duan,et al.  Using the distance between sets of hierarchical taxonomic clinical concepts to measure patient similarity , 2019, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making.

[18]  Mark A. Musen,et al.  Comparison of Ontology-based Semantic-Similarity Measures , 2008, AMIA.

[19]  Zhiyong Lu,et al.  Challenges in clinical natural language processing for automated disorder normalization , 2015, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[20]  W. Campbell,et al.  DeJong's The neurologic examination. , 1992 .

[21]  Xiaolu Fei,et al.  Measurement and application of patient similarity in personalized predictive modeling based on electronic medical records , 2019, Biomedical engineering online.

[22]  Abhishek Pandey,et al.  Natural language processing systems for capturing and standardizing unstructured clinical information: A systematic review , 2017, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[23]  Maria Liakata,et al.  Using clinical Natural Language Processing for health outcomes research: Overview and actionable suggestions for future advances , 2018, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[24]  Shraddha Pai,et al.  Patient Similarity Networks for Precision Medicine. , 2018, Journal of molecular biology.

[25]  Steven H. Brown,et al.  Evaluation of the content coverage of SNOMED CT: ability of SNOMED clinical terms to represent clinical problem lists. , 2006, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[26]  Ted Pedersen,et al.  Measures of semantic similarity and relatedness in the biomedical domain , 2007, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[27]  Cristián Zegers Ariztía,et al.  Manual , 2002 .

[28]  James J. Cimino,et al.  Towards the development of a conceptual distance metric for the UMLS , 2004, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[29]  Ted Pedersen,et al.  Evaluating semantic similarity and relatedness over the semantic grouping of clinical term pairs , 2015, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[30]  Jeffrey P. Krischer,et al.  Research Paper: Variation of SNOMED CT Coding of Clinical Research Concepts among Coding Experts , 2007, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[31]  Olivier Bodenreider,et al.  Bio-ontologies: current trends and future directions , 2006, Briefings Bioinform..

[32]  Mark A. Musen,et al.  The protégé project: a look back and a look forward , 2015, SIGAI.

[33]  Bridget T. McInnes,et al.  Association measures for estimating semantic similarity and relatedness between biomedical concepts , 2019, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[34]  Riccardo Bellazzi,et al.  Patient similarity for precision medicine: A systematic review , 2018, J. Biomed. Informatics.