Response surface optimization for joint contact model evaluation.

When optimization is used to evaluate a joint contact model's ability to reproduce experimental measurements, the high computational cost of repeated contact analysis can be a limiting factor. This paper presents a computationally-efficient response surface optimization methodology to address this limitation. Quadratic response surfaces were fit to contact quantities (contact force, maximum pressure, average pressure, and contact area) predicted by a discrete element contact model of the tibiofemoral joint for various combinations of material modulus and relative bone pose (i.e., position and orientation). The response surfaces were then used as surrogates for costly contact analyses in optimizations that minimized differences between measured and predicted contact quantities. The methodology was evaluated theoretically using six sets of synthetic (i.e., computer-generated) contact data, and practically using one set of experimental contact data. For the synthetic cases, the response surface optimizations recovered all contact quantities to within 3.4% error. For the experimental case, they matched all contact quantities to within 6.3% error except for maximum contact pressure, which was in error by up to 50%. Response surface optimization provides rapid evaluation of joint contact models within a limited range of relative bone poses and can help identify potential weaknesses in contact model formulation and/or experimental data quality.

[1]  W. Herzog,et al.  Effects of inserting a pressensor film into articular joints on the actual contact mechanics. , 1998, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[2]  L. Mockros,et al.  Indentation tests of human articular cartilage. , 1976, Journal of biomechanics.

[3]  F Guilak,et al.  An axisymmetric boundary integral model for incompressible linear viscoelasticity: application to the micropipette aspiration contact problem. , 2000, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[4]  K. An,et al.  Pressure distribution on articular surfaces: application to joint stability evaluation. , 1990, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  E. Chao,et al.  A comparison of different methods in predicting static pressure distribution in articulating joints. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  M. Bendjaballah,et al.  Biomechanical response of the passive human knee joint under anterior-posterior forces. , 1998, Clinical biomechanics.

[7]  G. Li,et al.  Variability of a three-dimensional finite element model constructed using magnetic resonance images of a knee for joint contact stress analysis. , 2001, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[8]  E B Hunziker,et al.  Topographical variation of the elastic properties of articular cartilage in the canine knee. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  M. Hull,et al.  Contact Mechanics of the Medial Tibial Plateau after Implantation of a Medial Meniscal Allograft , 2000, The American journal of sports medicine.

[10]  N Verdonschot,et al.  Finite element and experimental models of cemented hip joint reconstructions can produce similar bone and cement strains in pre-clinical tests. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  H. Grootenboer,et al.  Articular contact in a three-dimensional model of the knee. , 1991, Journal of Biomechanics.

[12]  M. Hull,et al.  A finite element model of the human knee joint for the study of tibio-femoral contact. , 2002, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[13]  V C Mow,et al.  Contact analysis of biphasic transversely isotropic cartilage layers and correlations with tissue failure. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  Juha Töyräs,et al.  Prediction of biomechanical properties of articular cartilage with quantitative magnetic resonance imaging. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[15]  D. Périé,et al.  In vivo determination of contact areas and pressure of the femorotibial joint using non-linear finite element analysis. , 1998, Clinical biomechanics.

[16]  A Wasilewski,et al.  [Topographic differences in the value of the 2 sec Elastic Modul in the cartilage tissue of the knee joint]. , 1986, Beitrage zur Orthopadie und Traumatologie.

[17]  S J Piazza,et al.  Three-dimensional dynamic simulation of total knee replacement motion during a step-up task. , 2001, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[18]  Leon M Keer,et al.  Contact stress and fracture analysis of articular cartilage , 1993 .

[19]  B B Seedhom,et al.  A technique for measuring the compressive modulus of articular cartilage under physiological loading rates with preliminary results , 1997, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[20]  W Herzog,et al.  Articular cartilage biomechanics: theoretical models, material properties, and biosynthetic response. , 1999, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[21]  V C Mow,et al.  Altered mechanics of cartilage with osteoarthritis: human osteoarthritis and an experimental model of joint degeneration. , 1999, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[22]  R K Korhonen,et al.  Biomechanical properties of knee articular cartilage. , 2003, Biorheology.

[23]  Benjamin J Fregly,et al.  Multibody dynamic simulation of knee contact mechanics. , 2004, Medical engineering & physics.

[24]  J S Wayne,et al.  Load sharing between solid and fluid phases in articular cartilage: I--Experimental determination of in situ mechanical conditions in a porcine knee. , 1998, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[25]  Benjamin J Fregly,et al.  Experimental evaluation of an elastic foundation model to predict contact pressures in knee replacements. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[26]  S. E. Irby,et al.  Instrumented implant for measuring tibiofemoral forces. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[27]  M. Holmes,et al.  Advanced theoretical and experimental techniques in cartilage research , 1982 .

[28]  Yasin Y Dhaher,et al.  The effect of vastus medialis forces on patello-femoral contact: a model-based study. , 2002, Journal of biomechanical engineering.