Faster quantum computation with permutations and resonant couplings

Abstract Recently, there has been increasing interest in designing schemes for quantum computations that are robust against errors. Although considerable research has been devoted to quantum error correction schemes, much less attention has been paid to optimizing the speed it takes to perform a quantum computation and developing computation models that act on decoherence-free subspaces. Speeding up a quantum computation is important, because fewer errors are likely to result. Encoding quantum information in a decoherence-free subspace is also important, because errors would be inherently suppressed. In this paper, we consider quantum computation in a decoherence-free subspace and also optimize its speed. To achieve this, we perform certain single-qubit quantum computations by simply permuting the underlying qubits. In this paper, we make progress in understanding the extent in which quantum computation can be performed by permuting qubits. Namely, we provide two different subgroups of the single qubit Clifford group that can be computed solely by permutations. To make the quantum computation universal for one of the schemes, we rely on resonant couplings motivated from physics. Our first scheme potentially improves the speed in which a quantum computation can be done. We also reduce the problem of finding the existence of permutational Clifford gates to that finding an upper bound for the rank of certain matrices.

[1]  Stephen P. Jordan,et al.  Permutational quantum computing , 2009, Quantum Inf. Comput..

[2]  B. Terhal,et al.  Roads towards fault-tolerant universal quantum computation , 2016, Nature.

[3]  M. Planat,et al.  The magic of universal quantum computing with permutations , 2017, 1701.06443.

[4]  Rui Chao,et al.  Permutation-Invariant Constant-Excitation Quantum Codes for Amplitude Damping , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[5]  Guanyu Zhu,et al.  Fast universal logical gates on topologically encoded qubits via constant-depth unitary circuits , 2019 .

[6]  Daniel A. Lidar,et al.  CONCATENATING DECOHERENCE-FREE SUBSPACES WITH QUANTUM ERROR CORRECTING CODES , 1998, quant-ph/9809081.

[7]  P. Oscar Boykin,et al.  On universal and fault-tolerant quantum computing: a novel basis and a new constructive proof of universality for Shor's basis , 1999, 40th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (Cat. No.99CB37039).

[8]  E. Knill,et al.  A scheme for efficient quantum computation with linear optics , 2001, Nature.

[9]  J. Levy Universal quantum computation with spin-1/2 pairs and Heisenberg exchange. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[10]  Geoff J Pryde,et al.  A quantum Fredkin gate , 2016, Science Advances.

[11]  Peter van Loock,et al.  Quantum error correction against photon loss using NOON states , 2015, 1512.07605.

[12]  A. Kitaev,et al.  Universal quantum computation with ideal Clifford gates and noisy ancillas (14 pages) , 2004, quant-ph/0403025.

[13]  D. Bernstein Matrix Mathematics: Theory, Facts, and Formulas , 2009 .

[14]  K B Whaley,et al.  Coherence-preserving quantum bits. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[15]  M. Planat,et al.  Quantum computing thanks to Bianchi groups , 2018, EPJ Web of Conferences.

[16]  K. B. Whaley,et al.  Universal quantum computation with the exchange interaction , 2000, Nature.

[17]  Guanyu Zhu,et al.  Fast universal logical gates on topologically encoded qubits at arbitrarily large code distances , 2018, 1806.02358.

[18]  Guanyu Zhu,et al.  Instantaneous braids and Dehn twists in topologically ordered states , 2018, Physical Review B.

[19]  Margret Heinze,et al.  Universal Uhrig dynamical decoupling for bosonic systems , 2018, Physical review letters.

[20]  Chang-shui Yu,et al.  One-step implementation of a hybrid Fredkin gate with quantum memories and single superconducting qubit in circuit QED and its applications. , 2018, Optics express.

[21]  G. Uhrig Keeping a quantum bit alive by optimized pi-pulse sequences. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[22]  S. Braunstein,et al.  Quantum computation , 1996 .

[23]  Milburn,et al.  Quantum optical Fredkin gate. , 1989, Physical review letters.

[24]  S. Girvin,et al.  Cavity quantum electrodynamics for superconducting electrical circuits: An architecture for quantum computation , 2004, cond-mat/0402216.

[25]  Debbie W. Leung,et al.  Bosonic quantum codes for amplitude damping , 1997 .

[26]  Chau,et al.  Simple realization of the Fredkin gate using a series of two-body operators. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[27]  J. Ignacio Cirac,et al.  High-fidelity hot gates for generic spin-resonator systems , 2016, 1607.01614.

[28]  Guanyu Zhu,et al.  Quantum origami: Transversal gates for quantum computation and measurement of topological order , 2017, Physical Review Research.

[29]  R. Jozsa,et al.  Quantum advantage of unitary Clifford circuits with magic state inputs , 2018, Proceedings of the Royal Society A.

[30]  M. Planat Clifford quantum computer and the Mathieu groups , 2007, 0711.1733.