Phytoplankton diversity: discontinuous assembly responses to environmental forcing

High diversity is a feature of many biological systems and it is generally considered to be important for their healthy functioning. Whether this is always or only sometimes true (see LAwroN 1997), high species richness and genetic represenration in ecosystems are seen to be threatened and, therefore, they are often objectives for conservation. It follows that 'protecting biodiversity' must be a good thing, even if we are nor quite sure how to do i t. Biodiversity (originally BioDiversity, coined as a shorthand for 'biological diversity': WILSON & PETER 1986), has no precise definition and is some way away from tangible quantification. 'Species richness' is biased by the search efficiency and taxonomic skill of the user. Gene pools can be guessed at but are scarcely measurable. The functions fulfilled by organisms in communities provide another focus for understanding the diversity o f the assemblage (MARTINEZ 1996), as account is taken of the physiological and morphological adaptive specialisms of rhe organisms present. Nevertheless, competition is still expected to select in favour of the functional specialists and to exclude the less well adapted contenders. It is nor difficult to echo the deduction ofTILMAN (1999) that the mechanistic explanation for the maintenance of the generally high biodiversity within given systems remains puzzling.

[1]  Colin S. Reynolds,et al.  Vegetation processes in the pelagic : a model for ecosystem theory , 1997 .

[2]  T. Zohary,et al.  Phytoplankton species diversity control through competitive exclusion and physical disturbances , 2000 .

[3]  Ulrich Sommer,et al.  The PEG-model of seasonal succession of planktonic events in fresh waters , 1986, Archiv für Hydrobiologie.

[4]  G. E. Hutchinson,et al.  The Balance of Nature and Human Impact: The paradox of the plankton , 2013 .

[5]  R. Margalef,et al.  Sorne concepts relative to the organization of plankton , 1967 .

[6]  J. Wilson,et al.  THE 'INTERMEDIATE DISTURBANCE HYPOTHESIS' OF SPECIES COEXISTENCE IS BASED ON PATCH DYNAMICS , 1994 .

[7]  M. Taper,et al.  Assessing the Impact of Competition on Community Assembly: A Case Study using Small Mammals , 1995 .

[8]  M. Álvarez-Cobelas,et al.  Lack of pattern among phytoplankton assemblages. Or, what does the exception to the rule mean? , 2000, Hydrobiologia.

[9]  C. Reynolds,et al.  Phytoplankton periodicity and sequences of dominance in an Amazonian flood-plain lake (Lago Batata, Pará, Brasil): responses to gradual environmental change , 1997, Hydrobiologia.

[10]  R. Margalef Life-forms of phytoplankton as survival alternatives in an unstable environment , 1978 .

[11]  R. Macarthur,et al.  The Theory of Island Biogeography , 1969 .

[12]  Deborah Monique,et al.  Authors' addresses , 2004 .

[13]  A. Jassby,et al.  A Quantitative Measure of Succession Rate and Its Application to the Phytoplankton of Lakes , 1974, The American Naturalist.

[14]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Competitive Exclusion in Herbaceous Vegetation , 1973, Nature.

[15]  D. Tilman Resource Competition between Plankton Algae: An Experimental and Theoretical Approach , 1977 .

[16]  Ingrid Chorus,et al.  Importance of intermediate disturbances for the species composition and diversity of phytoplankton in two very different Berlin lakes , 1993, Hydrobiologia.

[17]  T. Fenchel,et al.  Global diversity and body size , 1996, Nature.

[18]  U. Sommer Disturbance-diversity relationships in two lakes of similar nutrient chemistry but contrasting disturbance regimes , 2004, Hydrobiologia.

[19]  A. E. Irish,et al.  Modelling phytoplankton dynamics in lakes and reservoirs: the problem of in-situ growth rates , 1997, Hydrobiologia.

[20]  A. E. Irish,et al.  Exploring the potential of the PROTECH model to investigate phytoplankton community theory , 1999, Hydrobiologia.

[21]  C. D. Sandgren,et al.  The effect of temporal environmental heterogeneity on community structure: a replicated experimental study , 1983, Oecologia.

[22]  L. Polishchuk CONTRIBUTION ANALYSIS OF DISTURBANCE‐CAUSED CHANGES IN PHYTOPLANKTON DIVERSITY , 1999 .

[23]  A. E. Irish,et al.  Modelling freshwater phytoplankton communities: an exercise in validation , 2000 .

[24]  G. Hardin The competitive exclusion principle. , 1960, Science.

[25]  U. Sommer The periodicity of phytoplankton in Lake Constance (Bodensee) in comparison to other deep lakes of central Europe , 1986, Hydrobiologia.

[26]  A. E. Irish,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of PROTECH, a new approach in phytoplankton modelling , 1999, Hydrobiologia.

[27]  Judit Padisák,et al.  The influence of different disturbance frequencies on the species richness, diversity and equitability of phytoplankton in shallow lakes , 2004, Hydrobiologia.

[28]  D. Tilman THE ECOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCES OF CHANGES IN BIODIVERSITY: A SEARCH FOR GENERAL PRINCIPLES101 , 1999 .

[29]  J. Lawton The Role of Species in Ecosystems: Aspects of Ecological Complexity and Biological Diversity , 1997 .

[30]  R. Paine Food Web Complexity and Species Diversity , 1966, The American Naturalist.

[31]  David M. Wilkinson,et al.  The disturbing history of intermediate disturbance , 1999 .

[32]  D. Currie,et al.  A re-examination of the expected effects of disturbance on diversity. , 2000 .

[33]  Ingrid Chorus,et al.  Importance of intermediate disturbances for the species composition and diversity of phytoplankton in two very different Berlin lakes , 1993 .

[34]  Paul A. Keddy,et al.  Assembly and response rules: two goals for predictive community ecology , 1992 .

[35]  Judit Padisák,et al.  Seasonal succession of phytoplankton in a large shallow lake (Balaton, Hungary) - a dynamic approach to ecological memory, its possible role and mechanisms , 1992 .

[36]  W. Lewis DYNAMICS AND SUCCESSION OF THE PHYTOPLANKTON IN A TROPICAL LAKE: LAKE LANAO, PHILIPPINES , 1978 .

[37]  C. S. Reynolds,et al.  Phytoplankton designer – or how to predict compositional responses to trophic-state change , 2000, Hydrobiologia.

[38]  J. Connell Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs. , 1978, Science.

[39]  C. S. Reynolds,et al.  THE INTERMEDIATE DISTURBANCE HYPOTHESIS AND ITS APPLICABILITY TO PLANKTONIC COMMUNITIES: COMMENTS ON THE VIEWS OF PADISÁK AND WILSON , 1995 .

[40]  J. A. Elliott,et al.  The effects of vertical mixing on a phytoplankton community: a modelling approach to the intermediate disturbance hypothesis , 2001 .

[41]  C. Reynolds THE PLANT LIFE OF THE PELAGIC , 1996 .

[42]  V. Huszar,et al.  Phytoplankton in an Amazonian flood-plain lake (Lago Batata, Brasil): diel variation and species strategies , 2000 .

[43]  J. Lawton Community ecology in a changing world , 2000 .

[44]  James H. Brown,et al.  Macroecology: The Division of Food and Space Among Species on Continents , 1989, Science.

[45]  U. Sommer An experimental test of the intermediate disturbance hypothesis using cultures of marine phytoplankton , 1995 .

[46]  Colin S. Reynolds,et al.  Phytoplankton periodicity: the interactions of form, function and environmental variability , 1984 .

[47]  Scales of disturbance and their role in plankton ecology , 1993 .

[48]  C. Reynolds Scales of disturbance and their role in plankton ecology , 2004, Hydrobiologia.

[49]  Colin S. Reynolds,et al.  Growth- and loss-rate responses of phytoplankton to intermittent artificial mixing and their potential application to the control of planktonic algal biomass , 1984 .