In recent years, with the development of remote sensing techniques, image classification based on remote sensing imagery with high spatial resolution has played a significant role. At present, there are mainly two ways to classify the imagery of high resolution: pixel-based method and object-based method. Because of the wide differences of spectral features in pixel-based method, 'salt-and-pepper' effect appears in the classification result, which decreases the accuracy. And the object-based method which is widely used in image classification has a low accuracy of classification about objects with similar spectral features and shape features. Each of the two methods has its advantages and disadvantages. It is generally agreed that object-based classification has an advantage over pixel-based classification. However, the previous study found that the results of object-based classification was deeply influenced by reference sampling method So it is necessary to have a comparison between object and pixel-based method under different reference sampling schemes. In this study, we studied pixel-based method and object-based method, selected samples using 'select samples randomly' method and 'select samples separated by objects' method respectively, and built classification models using SVM and RF classifiers respectively. We compared different classification methods and analyzed the impacts of selection of samples and classifiers on classification results. The research showed that the accuracy of classification depends on the distribution of sample points. When sample points were selected randomly(Rand), object-based method got a higher accuracy; when sample points were selected by reference objects separately(Sep), pixel-based method got a higher accuracy.
[1]
Lindi J. Quackenbush,et al.
Impact of training and validation sample selection on classification accuracy and accuracy assessment when using reference polygons in object-based classification
,
2013
.
[2]
Steven E. Franklin,et al.
A comparison of pixel-based and object-based image analysis with selected machine learning algorithms for the classification of agricultural landscapes using SPOT-5 HRG imagery
,
2012
.
[3]
Qihao Weng,et al.
A survey of image classification methods and techniques for improving classification performance
,
2007
.
[4]
Gerardo Herrera,et al.
Mapping groundwater level and aquifer storage variations from InSAR measurements in the Madrid aquifer, Central Spain
,
2017
.
[5]
Alan H. Strahler,et al.
A note on procedures used for accuracy assessment in land cover maps derived from AVHRR data
,
2000
.
[6]
Giorgos Mountrakis,et al.
Assessing the impact of training sample selection on accuracy of an urban classification: a case study in Denver, Colorado
,
2014
.