Influence of Intraoperative Air Tamponade Time on Graft Adherence in Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty

Purpose: To study the influence of different intraoperative air tamponade times on graft adherence after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). Methods: In this interventional case series, we evaluated 117 eyes with Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) that underwent DMEK using intraoperative air tamponade times of 60 minutes (group I; n = 39), 45 minutes (group II; n = 39), or 30 minutes (group III; n = 39). At 1 and 6 months postoperatively, graft adherence status, endothelial cell density, central pachymetry, and postoperative complications were recorded. Results: At 1 month, 19 of the 117 eyes (16.2%) showed a clinically significant detachment (>1/3 of the graft surface area and affecting visual axis): 6 eyes in group I (15.4%), 5 eyes in group II (12.8%), and 8 eyes in group III (20.5%) (P = 0.82). A minor detachment (<1/3 of the graft surface area and not affecting visual axis) was observed in 6 eyes in group I (15.4%), in 7 eyes in group II (17.9%), and in 4 eyes in group III (10.3%) (P = 0.82). The overall rebubbling rate was 11%, with no difference among the groups (P = 0.07). Mean endothelial cell density decrease at 6 months was 41% (±17%) (P = 0.56), whereas mean central pachymetry decreased by 23 (±10) % (P = 0.77), with no differences between the groups. Conclusions: The incidence of graft detachment after DMEK for FECD did not differ between the eyes that had a 60-, 45-, or 30-minute intraoperative air tamponade. Reducing the intraoperative air tamponade time to 30 minutes may be considered for DMEK in eyes with uncomplicated FECD.

[1]  C. Cursiefen,et al.  Graft Detachment Pattern After Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Comparing Air Versus 20% SF6 Tamponade , 2018, Cornea.

[2]  A. Ruzza,et al.  Factors Associated With Early Graft Detachment in Primary Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty. , 2018, American journal of ophthalmology.

[3]  I. Dapena,et al.  DMEK complications: current treatment and recommendations , 2018 .

[4]  D. Rootman,et al.  Comparison of Sulfur Hexafluoride (SF6) and Air Tamponade in Noniridectomized Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty , 2017, Cornea.

[5]  F. Kruse,et al.  Air Versus Sulfur Hexafluoride Gas Tamponade in Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty: A Fellow Eye Comparison , 2018, Cornea.

[6]  John P Berdahl,et al.  Influences on rebubble rate in Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty , 2017, Clinical ophthalmology.

[7]  Laurence E. Frank,et al.  Multicenter Study of 6-Month Clinical Outcomes After Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty , 2017, Cornea.

[8]  I. Dapena,et al.  Prevention and Management of Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Complications , 2017, Cornea.

[9]  Daniel Pilger,et al.  Rebubbling in Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty: Influence of Pressure and Duration of the Intracameral Air Tamponade. , 2017, American journal of ophthalmology.

[10]  F. Yu,et al.  Outcomes of Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty in Patients With Previous Glaucoma Surgery , 2016, Cornea.

[11]  F. Kruse,et al.  Role of Initial Intraocular Pressure in Graft Adhesion After Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty , 2017, Cornea.

[12]  P. Enders,et al.  One-year outcome after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) comparing sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) 20% versus 100% air for anterior chamber tamponade , 2016, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[13]  F. Price,et al.  Prevention and Management of Pupil Block After Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty , 2016, Cornea.

[14]  F. Kruse,et al.  Long-term Clinical Outcome After Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty. , 2016, American journal of ophthalmology.

[15]  L. Cope,et al.  Comparison of 20% sulfur hexafluoride with air for intraocular tamponade in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). , 2016, Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia.

[16]  F. Kruse,et al.  Anterior Chamber Air Bubble to Achieve Graft Attachment After DMEK: Is Bigger Always Better? , 2016, Cornea.

[17]  A. Joussen,et al.  Rate and Localization of Graft Detachment in Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty , 2016, Cornea.

[18]  T. Dietlein,et al.  Immediate Postoperative Intraocular Pressure Changes After Anterior Chamber Air Fill in Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty , 2016, Cornea.

[19]  E. G. Groeneveld-van Beek,et al.  Association Between Graft Storage Time and Donor Age With Endothelial Cell Density and Graft Adherence After Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty. , 2016, JAMA ophthalmology.

[20]  J. Güell,et al.  Comparison of Sulfur Hexafluoride 20% versus Air Tamponade in Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty. , 2015, Ophthalmology.

[21]  Z. M. Mayko,et al.  Standardized DMEK Technique: Reducing Complications Using Prestripped Tissue, Novel Glass Injector, and Sulfur Hexafluoride (SF6) Gas , 2015, Cornea.

[22]  T. Röck,et al.  Causes that influence the detachment rate after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty , 2015, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[23]  I. Dapena,et al.  Clinical outcome of 500 consecutive cases undergoing Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty. , 2015, Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.).

[24]  I. Gorovoy,et al.  Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty postoperative year 1 endothelial cell counts. , 2015, American journal of ophthalmology.

[25]  S. Deng,et al.  Clinical outcomes of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty using eye bank-prepared tissues. , 2015, American journal of ophthalmology.

[26]  A. Joussen,et al.  Influence of the difficulty of graft unfolding and attachment on the outcome in descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty , 2015, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[27]  U. Schlötzer-Schrehardt,et al.  Clinical and Ultrastructural Characteristics of Graft Failure in DMEK: 1-Year Results After Repeat DMEK , 2015, Cornea.

[28]  U. Pleyer,et al.  Clinicopathology of graft detachment after Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty , 2014, Acta ophthalmologica.

[29]  Silke Oellerich,et al.  Endothelial cell changes as an indicator for upcoming allograft rejection following descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. , 2014, American journal of ophthalmology.

[30]  U. Schlötzer-Schrehardt,et al.  Graft adhesion in descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty dependent on size of removal of host's descemet membrane. , 2014, JAMA ophthalmology.

[31]  M. Gorovoy DMEK Complications , 2014, Cornea.

[32]  Eva Lankenau,et al.  Optimizing descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty using intraoperative optical coherence tomography. , 2013, JAMA ophthalmology.

[33]  I. Tsinopoulos,et al.  Air Toxicity for Primary Human-Cultured Corneal Endothelial Cells: An In Vitro Model , 2013, Cornea.

[34]  E. G. Groeneveld-van Beek,et al.  Standardized ‘no‐touch’ donor tissue preparation for DALK and DMEK: harvesting undamaged anterior and posterior transplants from the same donor cornea , 2013, Acta ophthalmologica.

[35]  I. Dapena,et al.  Predictive value of optical coherence tomography in graft attachment after Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty. , 2013, Ophthalmology.

[36]  F. Kruse,et al.  Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty versus descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. , 2012, American journal of ophthalmology.

[37]  Laurence E. Frank,et al.  Prevention and management of graft detachment in descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. , 2012, Archives of ophthalmology.

[38]  Frederico P. Guerra,et al.  Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty: prospective study of 1-year visual outcomes, graft survival, and endothelial cell loss. , 2011, Ophthalmology.

[39]  K. Droutsas,et al.  Standardized "no-touch" technique for descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. , 2011, Archives of ophthalmology.

[40]  G. Melles,et al.  Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). , 2006, Cornea.