Attentional mechanisms in the generation of sympathy

Empathic responses, such as sympathy towards others, are a key ingredient in the decision to provide help to those in need. The determinants of empathic responses are usually thought to be the vividness, similarity, and proximity of the victim. However, recent research highlights the role that attention plays in the generation of feelings. We expanded on this idea by investigating whether sympathy depends on cognitive mechanisms such as attention. In two studies we found that sympathy responses were lower and reaction times were longer when targets were presented with distractors. In addition, online sympathy judgments that allow attentional focusing on a target lead to greater affective responses than judgments made from memory. We conclude that attention is an ingredient in the generation of sympathy, and discuss implications for research on prosocial behaviour and the interaction between attention and emotions.

[1]  R. Dolan,et al.  Distinct spatial frequency sensitivities for processing faces and emotional expressions , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[2]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment , 2002 .

[3]  P. Slovic,et al.  Affective asynchrony and the measurement of the affective attitude component , 2007 .

[4]  J. Eastwood,et al.  Differential attentional guidance by unattended faces expressing positive and negative emotion , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[5]  D. Kahneman A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality. , 2003, The American psychologist.

[6]  Norbert Schwarz,et al.  The hedonic marking of processing fluency: Implications for evaluative judgment , 2003 .

[7]  R. Zajonc,et al.  Affect, cognition, and awareness: affective priming with optimal and suboptimal stimulus exposures. , 1993, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[8]  M. Eimer,et al.  The processing of emotional facial expression is gated by spatial attention: evidence from event-related brain potentials. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[9]  Mark H. Davis Empathy: A Social Psychological Approach , 1994 .

[10]  Paul Slovic,et al.  “If I look at the mass I will never act”: Psychic numbing and genocide , 2007, Judgment and Decision Making.

[11]  Klaus Kessler,et al.  Attentional Inhibition Has Social-Emotional Consequences for Unfamiliar Faces , 2005, Psychological science.

[12]  Stephen Dickert Two Routes to the Perception of Need: The role of affective vs. deliberative information processing in prosocial behavior , 2008 .

[13]  Jane E. Raymond,et al.  Affective Influences of Selective Attention , 2006 .

[14]  C. Batson,et al.  An additional antecedent of empathic concern: valuing the welfare of the person in need. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Faces capture attention: Evidence from inhibition of return , 2006 .

[16]  Paul Slovic,et al.  Psychic Numbing and Genocide , 2007 .

[17]  Ilana Ritov,et al.  The singularity effect of identified victims in separate and joint evaluations , 2005 .

[18]  Paul Slovic,et al.  The affect heuristic , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[19]  V. Reyna,et al.  Fuzzy-trace theory: An interim synthesis , 1995 .

[20]  M. Posner,et al.  Research on attention networks as a model for the integration of psychological science. , 2007, Annual review of psychology.

[21]  N. Lavie,et al.  Changing Faces: A Detection Advantage in the Flicker Paradigm , 2001, Psychological science.

[22]  J. Driver,et al.  Modulation of visual processing by attention and emotion: windows on causal interactions between human brain regions , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[23]  Daniel C. Hyde,et al.  All Numbers Are Not Equal: An Electrophysiological Investigation of Small and Large Number Representations , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[24]  P. Vuilleumier,et al.  How brains beware: neural mechanisms of emotional attention , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[25]  J. Gross Emotion regulation: affective, cognitive, and social consequences. , 2002, Psychophysiology.

[26]  Michel Tuan Pham Emotion and Rationality: A Critical Review and Interpretation of Empirical Evidence , 2007 .

[27]  C. Daniel Batson,et al.  How social an animal? The human capacity for caring. , 1990 .

[28]  Jane E Raymond,et al.  Selective Attention Determines Emotional Responses to Novel Visual Stimuli , 2003, Psychological science.

[29]  M. Posner,et al.  Cognitive and emotional influences in anterior cingulate cortex , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[30]  Jane E Raymond,et al.  Emotional devaluation of distracting patterns and faces: a consequence of attentional inhibition during visual search? , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[31]  Andreas Glöckner,et al.  Modeling Option and Strategy Choices with Connectionist Networks: Towards an Integrative Model of Automatic and Deliberate Decision Making , 2008, Judgment and Decision Making.

[32]  G. Fricchione Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain , 1995 .

[33]  R. Hastie,et al.  The relationship between memory and judgment depends on whether the judgment task is memory-based or on-line , 1986 .

[34]  M. Posner,et al.  Images of mind , 1994 .

[35]  D. Hamilton,et al.  Perceiving persons and groups. , 1996, Psychological review.

[36]  Ilana Ritov,et al.  The ''Identified Victim'' Effect: An Identified Group, or Just a Single Individual? , 2005 .

[37]  Paul Slovic,et al.  The Springs of Action: Affective and Analytical Information Processing in Choice , 2000 .

[38]  M. Posner,et al.  The Development of Executive Attention: Contributions to the Emergence of Self-Regulation , 2005, Developmental neuropsychology.

[39]  Melina A. Kunar,et al.  The affective consequences of visual attention in preview search , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[40]  N. Lavie,et al.  The Role of Perceptual Load in Processing Distractor Faces , 2003, Psychological science.

[41]  R. Zajonc Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. , 1968 .

[42]  D. Ariely Seeing Sets: Representation by Statistical Properties , 2001, Psychological science.

[43]  Deborah A. Small,et al.  The Scarecrow and the Tin Man: The Vicissitudes of Human Sympathy and Caring , 2007 .

[44]  E. Phelps,et al.  Emerging perspectives on emotion–cognition interactions , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[45]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Domain specificity in visual cortex. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[46]  E. Fox Processing emotional facial expressions: The role of anxiety and awareness , 2002, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[47]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  Explaining the Identifiable Victim Effect , 1997 .

[48]  Christopher K. Hsee,et al.  Risk as Feelings , 2001, Psychological bulletin.