A Digital Smoking Cessation Program Delivered Through Internet and Cell Phone Without Nicotine Replacement (Happy Ending): Randomized Controlled Trial

Background Happy Ending (HE) is an intense 1-year smoking cessation program delivered via the Internet and cell phone. HE consists of more than 400 contacts by email, Web pages, interactive voice response, and short message service technology. HE includes a craving helpline and a relapse prevention system, providing just-in-time therapy. All the components of the program are fully automated. Objective The objectives were to describe the rationale for the design of HE, to assess the 12-month efficacy of HE in a sample of smokers willing to attempt to quit without the use of nicotine replacement therapy, and to explore the potential effect of HE on coping planning and self-efficacy (prior to quitting) and whether coping planning and self-efficacy mediate treatment effect. Methods A two-arm randomized controlled trial was used. Subjects were recruited via Internet advertisements and randomly assigned to condition. Inclusion criteria were willingness to quit on a prescribed day without using nicotine replacement and being aged 18 years or older. The intervention group received HE, and the control group received a 44-page self-help booklet. Abstinence was defined as “not even a puff of smoke, for the last seven days” and was assessed by means of Internet surveys or telephone interviews 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postcessation. The main outcome was repeated point abstinence (ie, abstinence at all four time points). Coping planning and self-efficacy were measured at baseline and at the end of the preparation phase (ie, after 2 weeks of treatment, but prior to cessation day). Results A total of 290 participants received either the HE intervention (n=144) or the control booklet (n=146). Using intent-to-treat analysis, participants in the intervention group reported clinically and statistically significantly higher repeated point abstinence rates than control participants (20% versus 7%, odds ratio [OR] = 3.43, 95% CI = 1.60-7.34, P = .002). Although no differences were observed at baseline, by the end of the preparation phase, significantly higher levels of coping planning (t 261 = 3.07, P = .002) and precessation self-efficacy (t 261 = 2.63, P = .01) were observed in the intervention group compared with the control group. However, neither coping planning nor self-efficacy mediated long-term treatment effect. For point abstinence 1 month after quitting, however, coping planning and self-efficacy showed a partial mediation of the treatment effect. Conclusions This 12-month trial documents a long-term treatment effect of a fully automated smoking cessation intervention without the use of nicotine replacement therapy. The study adds to the promise of using digital media in supporting behavior change.

[1]  Alexander J. Rothman,et al.  Self-regulation and behavior change: Disentangling behavioral initiation and behavioral maintenance , 2004 .

[2]  A. Bandura Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[3]  S. Shiffman,et al.  Randomized controlled trial of a web-based computer-tailored smoking cessation program as a supplement to nicotine patch therapy. , 2005, Addiction.

[4]  Andrew J Waters,et al.  Negative affect and smoking lapses: a prospective analysis. , 2004, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[5]  R. Baumeister,et al.  Losing Control: How and Why People Fail at Self-Regulation , 1994 .

[6]  L. Kozlowski,et al.  The Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence: a revision of the Fagerström Tolerance Questionnaire. , 1991, British journal of addiction.

[7]  S. Shiffman,et al.  Progression from a smoking lapse to relapse: prediction from abstinence violation effects, nicotine dependence, and lapse characteristics. , 1996, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[8]  Timothy B Baker,et al.  Have we lost our way? The need for dynamic formulations of smoking relapse proneness. , 2002, Addiction.

[9]  Alexander J. Rothman,et al.  Toward a theory-based analysis of behavioral maintenance. , 2000, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[10]  R. Shegog,et al.  A review of computer and Internet-based interventions for smoking behavior. , 2006, Addictive behaviors.

[11]  Brian G Danaher,et al.  The Information Architecture of Behavior Change Websites , 2005, Journal of medical Internet research.

[12]  E. Tabor Handbook of Self-Regulation: Research, Theory, and Applications , 2006 .

[13]  P. Gollwitzer Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. , 1999 .

[14]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  J. Noell,et al.  A randomised control study of a fully automated internet based smoking cessation programme , 2006, Tobacco Control.

[16]  P. Kraft,et al.  Happy ending: a randomized controlled trial of a digital multi-media smoking cessation intervention. , 2008, Addiction.

[17]  P. Pintrich,et al.  Handbook of self-regulation , 2000 .

[18]  V. Strecher Computer-tailored smoking cessation materials: a review and discussion. , 1999, Patient education and counseling.

[19]  Saul Shiffman,et al.  Reflections on smoking relapse research. , 2006, Drug and alcohol review.

[20]  E Lichtenstein,et al.  Smoking cessation: what have we learned over the past decade? , 1992, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[21]  S. Shiffman,et al.  First lapses to smoking: within-subjects analysis of real-time reports. , 1996, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[22]  W F Velicer,et al.  Assessing outcome in smoking cessation studies. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.

[23]  S Shiffman,et al.  Temptations to smoke after quitting: a comparison of lapsers and maintainers. , 1996, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[24]  M. Fiore,et al.  Smoking withdrawal dynamics: I. Abstinence distress in lapsers and abstainers. , 2003, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[25]  Carlo C. DiClemente,et al.  Self-Efficacy and Addictive Behaviors , 1995 .

[26]  R. Baumeister,et al.  Self-Regulation Failure: An Overview , 1996 .

[27]  Benjamin Schüz,et al.  Action planning and coping planning for long-term lifestyle change: Theory and assessment , 2005 .

[28]  D. Warburton,et al.  Attribution and the effects of expectancy: how beliefs can influence the experiences of smoking cessation. , 2003, Addictive behaviors.

[29]  Stephen Palmer,et al.  Brief Cognitive Behaviour Therapy , 2000 .

[30]  K. Vohs,et al.  Handbook of self-regulation : research, theory, and applications , 2004 .

[31]  Mary J Wills,et al.  Do u smoke after txt? Results of a randomised trial of smoking cessation using mobile phone text messaging , 2005, Tobacco Control.

[32]  D. Wetter,et al.  Predicting relapse back to smoking: contrasting affective and physical models of dependence. , 2002, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[33]  T. Baker,et al.  Postcessation cigarette use: the process of relapse. , 1990, Addictive behaviors.

[34]  K. Emmons,et al.  Relapse and maintenance issues for smoking cessation. , 2000, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.