Comparison of angioscopic findings among second-generation drug-eluting stents.

BACKGROUND First-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) have reduced short-term stent failure as compared to bare-metal stents due to the inhibition of neointima hyperplasia, but instead increased the risk of very-late stent failure. Although better outcomes have been reported for second-generation DES than for first-generation DES, the difference in the angioscopic findings at 1-year follow-up has not been adequately elucidated among second-generation DES. METHODS Consecutive 161 patients who received angioscopic examination at 1 year after implantation of second-generation DES, i.e. Nobori biolimus-eluting stents (Terumo, Tokyo, Japan) (N-BES, n=25), Xience everolimus-eluting stents (Abbot Vascular, Santa Clara, CA, USA; X-EES, n=95), or Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stents (Resolute Integrity; Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA; R-ZES, n=41), in de novo native coronary lesions were analyzed. RESULTS Maximum neointima coverage grade (N-BES, 0.9±0.3; X-EES, 1.2±0.4; R-ZES, 1.5±0.5; p<0.001) was the highest in R-ZES and lowest in N-BES. Heterogeneity score was higher in R-ZES than in N-BES (N-BES, 0.8±0.4; X-EES, 0.9±0.4; R-ZES, 1.1±0.5; p=0.007). Maximum yellow color grade and prevalence of thrombus were not different. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that only stent type was associated with maximum neointima coverage grade; stent type and total stent length were associated with heterogeneity score; and stenting for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and total stent length were associated with maximum yellow color grade. CONCLUSIONS Neointima coverage and heterogeneity were mainly determined by stent type even among second-generation DES, while yellow color was determined mainly by whether target lesion was of ACS.

[1]  Seiki Nagata,et al.  Incomplete neointimal coverage of sirolimus-eluting stents: angioscopic findings. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[2]  A. Hirayama,et al.  Angioscopic evaluation of neointima coverage: sirolimus drug-eluting stent versus bare metal stent. , 2006, American heart journal.

[3]  D. Balzi,et al.  Comparison between drug-eluting and bare metal stent on ST-elevation myocardial infarction outcome: should second-generation drug-eluting stent be preferred? , 2014, Journal of cardiology.

[4]  K. Kodama,et al.  Atherosclerotic change at one year after implantation of Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent vs. everolimus-eluting stent. , 2014, Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society.

[5]  M. Takano,et al.  Lack of Association Between Large Angiographic Late Loss and Low Risk of In-Stent ThrombusCLINICAL PERSPECTIVE , 2008 .

[6]  Volker Klauss,et al.  Comparison of zotarolimus-eluting and everolimus-eluting coronary stents. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  K. Kodama,et al.  Atherosclerotic and thrombogenic neointima formed over sirolimus drug-eluting stent: an angioscopic study. , 2009, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[8]  M. Hori,et al.  Serial Angioscopic Evidence of Incomplete Neointimal Coverage After Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation: Comparison With Bare-Metal Stents , 2007, Circulation.

[9]  R. Whitbourn,et al.  Clinical and angiographic results with the next-generation resolute stent system: a prospective, multicenter, first-in-human trial. , 2009, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[10]  Gregg W Stone,et al.  Randomized comparison of everolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents. 2-year follow-up from the SPIRIT (Clinical Evaluation of the XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System) IV trial. , 2011, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[11]  T. Hamasaki,et al.  Characterization of patients with angioscopically-detected in-stent mural thrombi – genetics of clopidogrel responsiveness and generations of drug-eluting stents. , 2015, Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society.

[12]  T. Akasaka,et al.  Biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stent versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent: a randomized, controlled, noninferiority trial. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[13]  A. Yeung,et al.  Clinical evaluation of the Resolute zotarolimus-eluting coronary stent system in the treatment of de novo lesions in native coronary arteries: the RESOLUTE US clinical trial. , 2011, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  R. Takeshige,et al.  Optical coherence tomography study of chronic-phase vessel healing after implantation of bare metal and paclitaxel-eluting self-expanding nitinol stents in the superficial femoral artery. , 2016, Journal of cardiology.

[15]  C. Di Mario,et al.  First Clinical Experience With a Paclitaxel Derivate–Eluting Polymer Stent System Implantation for In-Stent Restenosis: Immediate and Long-Term Clinical and Angiographic Outcome , 2002, Circulation.

[16]  P. Serruys,et al.  Five-year long-term clinical follow-up of the XIENCE V everolimus-eluting coronary stent system in the treatment of patients with de novo coronary artery disease: the SPIRIT II trial. , 2013, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[17]  M. Hori,et al.  The healing process of infarct-related plaques. Insights from 18 months of serial angioscopic follow-up. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[18]  M. Nishino,et al.  Comparison of angioscopic findings and three-year cardiac events between sirolimus-eluting stent and bare-metal stent in acute myocardial infarction. , 2011, The American journal of cardiology.

[19]  A. Hirayama,et al.  Assessment of plaque vulnerability by angioscopic classification of plaque color. , 2004, American heart journal.

[20]  Neville Kukreja,et al.  Early and late coronary stent thrombosis of sirolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents in routine clinical practice: data from a large two-institutional cohort study , 2007, The Lancet.

[21]  M. Takano,et al.  Lack of Association Between Large Angiographic Late Loss and Low Risk of In-Stent Thrombus: Angioscopic Comparison Between Paclitaxel- and Sirolimus-Eluting Stents , 2008, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.

[22]  R. Virmani,et al.  Pathological Correlates of Late Drug-Eluting Stent Thrombosis: Strut Coverage as a Marker of Endothelialization , 2007, Circulation.

[23]  M. Togni,et al.  Abluminal biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stent versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent (COMPARE II): a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial , 2013, The Lancet.

[24]  Angioscopic Comparison of Resolute and Endeavor Zotarolimus-Eluting Stents. , 2016, Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society.

[25]  G. Stone,et al.  Randomized Comparison of Everolimus-Eluting and Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents: Two-Year Clinical Follow-Up From the Clinical Evaluation of the Xience V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Patients With De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions (SPIRIT) III Trial , 2009, Circulation.

[26]  M. Nishino,et al.  High incidence of thrombus formation at 18 months after paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation: angioscopic comparison with sirolimus-eluting stent. , 2010, American heart journal.

[27]  F. Sera,et al.  Heterogeneous arterial healing in patients following paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation: comparison with sirolimus-eluting stents. , 2009, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[28]  M. Hori,et al.  Angioscopic comparison of neointimal coverage between zotarolimus- and sirolimus-eluting stents. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[29]  Renu Virmani,et al.  One step forward and two steps back with drug-eluting-stents: from preventing restenosis to causing late thrombosis and nouveau atherosclerosis. , 2009, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[30]  S. Saito,et al.  Clinical and angiographic evaluation of the resolute zotarolimus-eluting coronary stent in Japanese patients – long-term outcome in the RESOLUTE Japan and RESOLUTE Japan small vessel study. , 2014, Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society.

[31]  Serial long-term evaluation of neointimal stent coverage and thrombus after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation by use of coronary angioscopy , 2007, Heart.

[32]  K. Kodama,et al.  Neointimal coverage of stents in human coronary arteries observed by angioscopy. , 1994, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[33]  Marco Valgimigli,et al.  Analysis of 14 trials comparing sirolimus-eluting stents with bare-metal stents. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.