Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't

It's about integrating individual clinical expertise and the best external evidence Evidence based medicine, whose philosophical origins extend back to mid-19th century Paris and earlier, remains a hot topic for clinicians, public health practitioners, purchasers, planners, and the public. There are now frequent workshops in how to practice and teach it (one sponsored by the BMJ will be held in London on 24 April); undergraduate1 and postgraduate2 training programmes are incorporating it3 (or pondering how to do so); British centres for evidence based practice have been established or planned in adult medicine, child health, surgery, pathology, pharmacotherapy, nursing, general practice, and dentistry; the Cochrane Collaboration and Britain's Centre for Review and Dissemination in York are providing systematic reviews of the effects of health care; new evidence based practice journals are being launched; and it has become a common topic in the lay media. But enthusiasm has been mixed with some negative reaction.4 5 6 Criticism has ranged from evidence based medicine being old hat to it being a dangerous innovation, perpetrated by the arrogant to serve cost cutters and suppress clinical freedom. As evidence based medicine continues to evolve and adapt, now is a useful time to refine the discussion of what it is and what it is not. Evidence based medicine is the conscientious, explicit, and judicious use of current best evidence in making decisions about the care of individual patients. The …

[1]  D. Sackett,et al.  A controlled trial of teaching critical appraisal of the clinical literature to medical students. , 1987, JAMA.

[2]  Patient care guidelines. , 1989, Issues in comprehensive pediatric nursing.

[3]  M. Schmidt Education Committee Report , 1993 .

[4]  R B Haynes,et al.  Effect of problem-based, self-directed undergraduate education on life-long learning. , 1993, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[5]  D. Sackett,et al.  Inpatient general medicine is evidence based , 1995, The Lancet.

[6]  S M Kurtz,et al.  Failing sick doctors , 1995, British medical journal.

[7]  D Grahame-Smith,et al.  Evidence based medicine: Socratic dissent , 1995, BMJ.

[8]  T. Greenhalgh “Is my practice evidence-based?” , 1996, BMJ.

[9]  D. Sackett,et al.  Guidelines for managing raised blood pressure , 1996, BMJ.

[10]  Cost effectiveness and equity are ignored , 1996, BMJ.

[11]  J. Dowie,et al.  Needs to be within framework of decision making based on decision analysis , 1996, BMJ.

[12]  Nigel T James Scientific method and raw data should be considered , 1996, BMJ.

[13]  A. Sharples,et al.  Authors' redefinition is better but not perfect , 1996, BMJ.

[14]  H. Hricak,et al.  Evidence-based medicine. , 1997, Singapore medical journal.

[15]  N. Black A national strategy for research and development: lessons from England. , 1997, Annual review of public health.

[16]  Doctors and patients must decide together whether anticoagulation is appropriate , 1998, BMJ.

[17]  D L Sackett,et al.  Using research findings in clinical practice , 1998, BMJ.

[18]  R. Wasserman,et al.  Pediatric research in office settings (PROS): a national practice-based research network to improve children's health care. , 1998, Pediatrics.

[19]  R. Wormald,et al.  Evidence based medicine, the Cochrane Collaboration, and the CONSORT statement , 1998, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[20]  Gene Feder,et al.  Guidelines for clinical guidelines , 1998, BMJ.

[21]  M Lugon,et al.  Is clinical effectiveness a management issue? , 1998, BMJ.

[22]  Jenny Field,et al.  General practitioners' perceptions of the route to evidence based medicine: a questionnaire survey , 1998, BMJ.

[23]  Evidence-based medicine or medicines-based evidence? , 1998, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[24]  D G Altman,et al.  Randomised trial of educational visits to enhance use of systematic reviews in 25 obstetric units , 1998, BMJ.

[25]  N. Douglas Systematic review of the efficacy of nasal CPAP , 1998, Thorax.