Accuracy of speech intelligibility index predictions for noise-masked young listeners with normal hearing and for elderly listeners with hearing impairment.

This study examined whether the accuracy of Speech Intelligibility Index (SII) predictions is affected by subject age when between-groups auditory sensitivity differences are controlled. SII predictive accuracy was assessed for elderly listeners with hearing impairment (EHI) and for young noise-masked listeners with normal hearing (NMN). SII predictive accuracy was poorer for the EHI subjects than for the NMN subjects across a range of test conditions and stimuli. Speech test redundancy, speech presentation level, signal-to-babble ratio, and babble level also affected SII predictive accuracy. The results suggest that the speech recognition difficulties experienced in noise by elderly listeners do not result solely from reduced auditory sensitivity.

[1]  L L Elliott,et al.  Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictability. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  C V Pavlovic Use of the articulation index for assessing residual auditory function in listeners with sensorineural hearing impairment. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  L. Humes,et al.  Speech-recognition difficulties of the hearing-impaired elderly: the contributions of audibility. , 1990, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[4]  S. Gordon-Salant Age-related differences in speech recognition performance as a function of test format and paradigm. , 1987, Ear and hearing.

[5]  J. Dubno,et al.  Evaluation of hearing-impaired listeners using a Nonsense-syllable Test. II. Syllable recognition and consonant confusion patterns. , 1982, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[6]  L E Humes,et al.  Speech identification difficulties of hearing-impaired elderly persons: the contributions of auditory processing deficits. , 1991, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[7]  John Fletcher,et al.  Speech Understanding and Aging , 1977 .

[8]  A J Klein,et al.  Upward spread of masking, hearing loss, and speech recognition in young and elderly listeners. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  D D Dirks,et al.  Stop-consonant recognition for normal-hearing listeners and listeners with high-frequency hearing loss. II: Articulation index predictions. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  S. Gordon-Salant,et al.  Temporal factors and speech recognition performance in young and elderly listeners. , 1993, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[11]  D. Dirks,et al.  A study of hearing in advanced age. , 1961, Archives of otolaryngology.

[12]  L E Humes,et al.  Factors associated with individual differences in clinical measures of speech recognition among the elderly. , 1994, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[13]  D. Schum,et al.  Actual and predicted word-recognition performance of elderly hearing-impaired listeners. , 1991, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[14]  S. Gelfand,et al.  Consonant recognition in quiet and in noise with aging among normal hearing listeners. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  Robert C. Bilger,et al.  Standardization of a Test of Speech Perception in Noise , 1984 .

[16]  J R Dubno,et al.  Comparison of frequency selectivity and consonant recognition among hearing-impaired and masked normal-hearing listeners. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  R. Plomp,et al.  Auditive and cognitive factors in speech perception by elderly listeners. III. Additional data and final discussion , 1992 .

[18]  J Jerger,et al.  Speech understanding in the elderly. , 1989, Ear and hearing.

[19]  A. M. Mimpen,et al.  Speech-reception threshold for sentences as a function of age and noise level. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  D D Dirks,et al.  Recognition of nonsense syllables by hearing-impaired listeners and by noise-masked normal hearers. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  C V Pavlovic,et al.  An articulation index based procedure for predicting the speech recognition performance of hearing-impaired individuals. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  G. Studebaker A "rationalized" arcsine transform. , 1985, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[23]  D D Dirks,et al.  Speech recognition and the Articulation Index for normal and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  R. Patterson,et al.  The deterioration of hearing with age: frequency selectivity, the critical ratio, the audiogram, and speech threshold. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  J Jerger,et al.  Correlational analysis of speech audiometric scores, hearing loss, age, and cognitive abilities in the elderly. , 1991, Ear and hearing.

[26]  R Carhart,et al.  An expanded test for speech discrimination utilizing CNC monosyllabic words. Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6. SAM-TR-66-55. , 1966, [Technical report] SAM-TR. USAF School of Aerospace Medicine.

[27]  D. Filion,et al.  Aging, selective attention, and inhibitory processes: a psychophysiological approach. , 1992, Psychology and Aging.

[28]  J. C. Steinberg,et al.  Factors Governing the Intelligibility of Speech Sounds , 1945 .

[29]  H. Levitt,et al.  Phoneme errors on a nonsense syllable test , 1975 .

[30]  R Plomp,et al.  Auditive and cognitive factors in speech perception by elderly listeners. II: Multivariate analyses. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[31]  D D Dirks,et al.  Frequency-importance functions for words in high- and low-context sentences. , 1992, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[32]  R. Kirk Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences , 1970 .

[33]  P M Zurek,et al.  Consonant reception in noise by listeners with mild and moderate sensorineural hearing impairment. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[34]  D D Dirks,et al.  Articulation index predictions of contextually dependent words. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[35]  R Plomp,et al.  The effect of linguistic entropy on speech perception in noise in young and elderly listeners. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[36]  J. Dubno,et al.  Effects of age and mild hearing loss on speech recognition in noise. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[37]  K. Helfer,et al.  Hearing loss, aging, and speech perception in reverberation and noise. , 1990, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[38]  D D Dirks,et al.  Some effects of spectral shaping on recognition of speech by hearing-impaired listeners. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[39]  D D Dirks,et al.  Auditory filter characteristics and consonant recognition for hearing-impaired listeners. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.