The wandering mind of men: ERP evidence for gender differences in attention bias towards attractive opposite sex faces.

To examine the time course and automaticity of our attention bias towards attractive opposite sex faces, event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded from 20 males and 20 females while they carried out a covert orienting task. Faces that were high, low or average in attractiveness, were presented in focus of attention, but were unrelated to task goals. Across the entire sample larger P2 amplitudes were found in response to both attractive and unattractive opposite sex faces, presumably reflecting early implicit selective attention to distinctive faces. In male but not female participants this was followed by an increased late slow wave for the attractive faces, signifying heightened processing linked to motivated attention. This latter finding is consistent with sexual strategy theory, which suggests that men and women have evolved to pursue different mating strategies with men being more attentive to cues such as facial beauty. In general, our ERP results suggest that, in addition to threat-related stimuli, other evolutionary-relevant information is also prioritized by our attention systems.

[1]  Sandra J. E. Langeslag,et al.  Event-related potential responses to love-related facial stimuli , 2007, Biological Psychology.

[2]  Jonas K. Olofsson,et al.  Affective picture processing: An integrative review of ERP findings , 2008, Biological Psychology.

[3]  W. Sommer,et al.  Facial attractiveness modulates early and late event-related brain potentials , 2007, Biological Psychology.

[4]  L Carretié,et al.  Emotion, attention, and the 'negativity bias', studied through event-related potentials. , 2001, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[5]  A. Öhman,et al.  Automatically elicited fear: Conditioned skin conductance responses to masked facial expressions , 1994 .

[6]  D. Buss,et al.  Sexual strategies theory: an evolutionary perspective on human mating. , 1993, Psychological review.

[7]  D. Buss,et al.  Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures , 1989, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[8]  G. Alexander,et al.  Sex Differences in Adults’ Relative Visual Interest in Female and Male Faces, Toys, and Play Styles , 2009, Archives of sexual behavior.

[9]  Saul L. Miller,et al.  Can't take my eyes off you: Attentional adhesion to mates and rivals. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[10]  Victor S. Johnston,et al.  Facial beauty and the late positive component of event‐related potentials , 1997 .

[11]  Paul Pauli,et al.  Modulation of event-related brain potentials during affective picture processing: a complement to startle reflex and skin conductance response? , 2004, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[12]  Luis Carretié,et al.  Automatic attention to emotional stimuli: Neural correlates , 2004, Human brain mapping.

[13]  Markus Junghöfer,et al.  Explicit attention interferes with selective emotion processing in human extrastriate cortex , 2007, BMC Neuroscience.

[14]  C. Senior,et al.  Beauty in the Brain of the Beholder , 2003, Neuron.

[15]  M. Gailliot,et al.  Adaptive attentional attunement: evidence for mating-related perceptual bias , 2007 .

[16]  E. Fox,et al.  Facial Expressions of Emotion: Are Angry Faces Detected More Efficiently? , 2000, Cognition & emotion.

[17]  G. Crombez,et al.  Does imminent threat capture and hold attention? , 2004, Emotion.

[18]  Benjamin Y Hayden,et al.  Economic principles motivating social attention in humans , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[19]  Michael C. Bailey,et al.  The necessities and luxuries of mate preferences: testing the tradeoffs. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[20]  O. John,et al.  Automatic vigilance: the attention-grabbing power of negative social information. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[21]  A. Ohman,et al.  Emotion drives attention: detecting the snake in the grass. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[22]  F. Martin,et al.  Affective picture processing and motivational relevance: arousal and valence effects on ERPs in an oddball task. , 2009, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[23]  G. Hajcak,et al.  Differentiating neural responses to emotional pictures: evidence from temporal-spatial PCA. , 2009, Psychophysiology.

[24]  Paul J. Whalen,et al.  Are Attractive People Rewarding? Sex Differences in the Neural Substrates of Facial Attractiveness , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[25]  E. Fox,et al.  Do threatening stimuli draw or hold visual attention in subclinical anxiety? , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[26]  Y. Bar-Haim,et al.  Threat-related attentional bias in anxious and nonanxious individuals: a meta-analytic study. , 2007, Psychological bulletin.

[27]  P. Vuilleumier,et al.  How brains beware: neural mechanisms of emotional attention , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[28]  Vera Ferrari,et al.  Repetition and Event-related Potentials: Distinguishing Early and Late Processes in Affective Picture Perception , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[29]  M. Bradley,et al.  Brain potentials in affective picture processing: covariation with autonomic arousal and affective report , 2000, Biological Psychology.

[30]  Boaz Levy,et al.  Gender differences in the motivational processing of facial beauty. , 2008, Learning and motivation.

[31]  Markus Junghöfer,et al.  Selective Visual Attention to Emotion , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[32]  Peter Lang,et al.  Brain processes in emotional perception: Motivated attention , 2004 .