A Review of Biofouling and its Control in Membrane Separation Bioreactors

Membrane separation technology is increasingly becoming an important innovation in biological wastewater treatment. Biofouling of the membrane is a major factor affecting the efficient and economic operation of membrane separation bioreactors (MBRs). This review summarizes the state-of-the-art progress in understanding the mechanisms and factors affecting membrane biofouling and the strategies for biofouling control. Biofouling mechanisms include the adsorption of soluble and suspended extracellular polymers on membrane surfaces and in membrane pores, the clogging of membrane pore structure by fine colloidal particles and cell debris, and the adhesion and deposition of sludge cake on membrane surfaces. Design and operating conditions of membrane modules and materials, hydrodynamic conditions in MBRs, process and environmental conditions of activated sludge systems, and the physicochemical properties of the wastewater are the dominant factors determining membrane biofouling. Current strategies to control biofouling include periodic relaxation, backwashing, chemical cleaning, and possible manipulation of hydrodynamic conditions and sludge properties. Achieving full integration of MBRs in wastewater treatment technology requires further research and development. Fundamental information on the bacteria, colloid, and membrane interaction, developed through multimethod and multiscale approaches, is particularly needed.

[1]  R. Schneider,et al.  Cake resistance and solute rejection in bacterial microfiltration: The role of the extracellular matrix , 1993 .

[2]  C. H. Lee,et al.  Application of Surface Modified Polypropylene Membranes to an Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactor , 2001, Environmental technology.

[3]  I. Droppo,et al.  Floc stabilization for multiple microscopic techniques , 1996, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[4]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Fouling of Reverse Osmosis Membranes by Aluminum Oxide Colloids , 1995 .

[5]  R. Field,et al.  Critical flux concept for microfiltration fouling , 1995 .

[6]  Hans G.L. Coster,et al.  Direct observation of particle deposition on the membrane surface during crossflow microfiltration , 1998 .

[7]  J. Manem,et al.  Bioflocculation in activated sludge: an analytic approach , 1993 .

[8]  Takeshi Sato,et al.  Effects of Activated Sludge Properties on Water Flux of Ultrafiltration Membrane Used for Human Excrement Treatment , 1991 .

[9]  A. Grasmick,et al.  Floc size distribution in a membrane bioreactor and consequences for membrane fouling , 1998 .

[10]  El Hani Bouhabila,et al.  Microfiltration of activated sludge using submerged membrane with air bubbling (application to wastewater treatment) , 1998 .

[11]  Yasutoshi Shimizu,et al.  Filtration characteristics of charged alumina membranes for methanogenic waste , 1989 .

[12]  Kazuo Yamamoto,et al.  Direct Solid-Liquid Separation Using Hollow Fiber Membrane in an Activated Sludge Aeration Tank , 1989 .

[13]  Y. Qian,et al.  Ultrafiltration of activated sludge with ceramic membranes in a cross-flow membrane bioreactor process , 2000 .

[14]  M. Jaffrin,et al.  Reversibility of fouling formed in activated sludge filtration , 1999 .

[15]  Yasutoshi Shimizu,et al.  Filtration characteristics of hollow fiber microfiltration membranes used in membrane bioreactor for domestic wastewater treatment , 1996 .

[16]  T. M. Keinath,et al.  Influence of process loading intensity on sludge clarification and thickening characteristics , 1979 .

[17]  A. Fane,et al.  Membrane fouling and its control in environmental applications , 2000 .

[18]  D. G. Allen,et al.  Surface properties of sludge and their role in bioflocculation and settleability. , 2001, Water research.

[19]  A. Andreadakis.  PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF ACTIVATED SLUDGE FLOC , 1993 .

[20]  J. Lawrence,et al.  Confocal laser scanning microscopy for analysis of microbial biofilms. , 1999, Methods in enzymology.

[21]  Dianne E. Wiley,et al.  Factors influencing critical flux in membrane filtration of activated sludge , 1999 .

[22]  In-Soung Chang,et al.  Membrane filtration characteristics in membrane-coupled activated sludge system -- the effect of physiological states of activated sludge on membrane fouling , 1998 .

[23]  K Brindle,et al.  The application of membrane biological reactors for the treatment of wastewaters. , 2000, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[24]  Yves Aurelle,et al.  Unstable secondary oil/water emulsion treatment using ultrafiltration: fouling control by backflushing , 1999 .

[25]  Betty H. Olson,et al.  Biofilm Fouling of RO Membranes—Its Nature and Effect on Treatment of Water for Reuse , 1984 .

[26]  A. Grasmick,et al.  Influence of hydrodynamics on fouling velocity in a recirculated MBR for wastewater treatment , 1999 .

[27]  J. Cowen,et al.  Development of a scanning confocal laser microscopic technique to examine the structure and composition of marine snow , 1997 .

[28]  G. Daigger,et al.  Manual on the causes and control of activated sludge bulking and foaming , 1992 .

[29]  J. H. Roorda,et al.  Understanding membrane fouling in ultrafiltration of WWTP-effluent , 2000 .

[30]  S. Paddock,et al.  Confocal laser scanning microscopy. , 1999, BioTechniques.

[31]  R. Sheikholeslami,et al.  Composite fouling - inorganic and biological : A review , 1999 .

[32]  Mark R. Wiesner,et al.  The promise of membrane technology , 1999 .

[33]  Harry F. Ridgway,et al.  Bacterial Adhesion and Fouling of Reverse Osmosis Membranes , 1985 .

[34]  A. Decho,et al.  Confocal imaging of in situ natural microbial communities and their extracellular polymeric secretions using Nanoplast resin. , 1999, BioTechniques.

[35]  Kazuo Yamamoto,et al.  Optimal Fiber Spacing in Externally Pressurized Hollow Fiber Module for Solid Liquid Separation , 1992 .

[36]  Simon Judd,et al.  Aerobic MBRs for domestic wastewater treatment: a review with cost considerations , 2000 .

[37]  Kwang-Ho Choo,et al.  Membrane fouling mechanisms in the membrane-coupled anaerobic bioreactor , 1996 .

[38]  H. Ridgway,et al.  Quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) analysis of surfactants influencing attachment of a Mycobacterium sp. to cellulose acetate and aromatic polyamide reverse osmosis membranes. , 1999, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[39]  Alain Grasmick,et al.  Hydrodynamic control of bioparticle deposition in a MBR applied to wastewater treatment , 1998 .

[40]  Tatsuki Ueda,et al.  Effects of aeration on suction pressure in a submerged membrane bioreactor , 1997 .

[41]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Chemical and physical aspects of natural organic matter (NOM) fouling of nanofiltration membranes , 1997 .

[42]  Chettiyappan Visvanathan,et al.  Application of air backflushing technique in membrane bioreactor , 1997 .

[43]  Chung‐Hak Lee,et al.  Fouling of Inorganic Membrane and Flux Enhancement in Membrane-Coupled Anaerobic Bioreactor , 1999 .

[44]  Y. Magara,et al.  The Effect of Operational Factors on Solid/Liquid Separation by Ultra-Membrane Filtration in a Biological Denitrification System for Collected Human Excreta Treatment Plants , 1991 .

[45]  I. Chang,et al.  Effect of pump shear on the performance of a crossflow membrane bioreactor. , 2001, Water research.

[46]  H. Flemming,et al.  Antifouling strategies in technical systems – a short review , 1996 .

[47]  M. Kraume,et al.  Performance of a bioreactor with submerged membranes for aerobic treatment of municipal waste water. , 2002, Water research.

[48]  M. Okada,et al.  Ultrafiltration behaviour of extracellular and metabolic products in activated sludge system with UF separation process , 2000 .