System-Level Use of Contextual Information

A system that exploits information—e.g. to support decision making—can use contextual information both in providing expectations and in resolving uncertain inferences. In the latter case, contextual reasoning involves inferring desired information (values of “problem variables”) on the basis of other available information (“context variables”). Relevant contexts are often not self-evident, but must be discovered or selected as a means to problem-solving. Therefore, context exploitation involves (a) predicting the value of contextual information to meet information needs; (b) selecting information types and sources expected to provide information useful in meeting those needs; (c) determining the relevance and quality of acquired information; and (d) applying selected information to a problem at hand. Fusion of contextual information can improve the quality of inferences, but involves concerns about the quality of the contextual information. The availability and quality of predictive models dictate the ways in which contextual information can be used. Many applications are benefitted by inference systems that adaptively discover and exploit context and refine such models to meet evolving information states and information needs.

[1]  Leiguang Gong Contextual modeling and applications , 2005, 2005 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics.

[2]  Alan N. Steinberg,et al.  Situation and context in data fusion and natural language understanding , 2008, 2008 11th International Conference on Information Fusion.

[3]  José M. Molina López,et al.  Context-based multi-level information fusion for harbor surveillance , 2015, Inf. Fusion.

[4]  Alan N. Steinberg,et al.  Revisions to the JDL data fusion model , 1999, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[5]  P. Valin,et al.  Context-based information quality for sequential decision making , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Multi-Disciplinary Conference on Cognitive Methods in Situation Awareness and Decision Support (CogSIMA).

[6]  P. Scott,et al.  Distributed reinforcement learning for sequential decision making , 2002, Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Information Fusion. FUSION 2002. (IEEE Cat.No.02EX5997).

[7]  David L. Hall,et al.  Dirty Secrets in Multisensor Data Fusion , 2001 .

[8]  Edward Waltz,et al.  Knowledge Management in the Intelligence Enterprise , 2003 .

[9]  Alain Appriou Situation assessment based on spatially ambiguous multisensor measurements , 2001, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[10]  Alan N. Steinberg,et al.  Foundations of Situation and Threat Assessment , 2017 .

[11]  Alan N. Steinberg,et al.  A Model for Threat Assessment , 2016 .

[12]  Donka Angelova,et al.  Sequential Monte Carlo algorithms for joint target tracking and classification using kinematic radar information , 2004 .

[13]  Alan N. Steinberg,et al.  Context-sensitive data fusion using structural equation modeling , 2009, 2009 12th International Conference on Information Fusion.

[14]  Christopher Bowman Process Assessment and Process Management for Intelligent Data Fusion & Resource Management Systems , 2012 .

[15]  D. Kahneman Thinking, Fast and Slow , 2011 .

[16]  Dale A. Lambert A Unification of Sensor and Higher-Level Fusion , 2006, 2006 9th International Conference on Information Fusion.

[17]  Peter D. Scott,et al.  Reasoning about situations in the early post-disaster response environment , 2006, 2006 9th International Conference on Information Fusion.

[18]  Xavier Briottet,et al.  Presentation and description of two classification methods using data fusion based on sensor management , 2001, Inf. Fusion.

[19]  Wesley C. Salmon,et al.  Statistical explanation & statistical relevance , 1971 .

[20]  Éloi Bossé,et al.  Information quality in information fusion , 2010, 2010 13th International Conference on Information Fusion.

[21]  Pierre Borne,et al.  Context-dependent trust in data fusion within the possibility theory , 1996, 1996 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. Information Intelligence and Systems (Cat. No.96CH35929).

[22]  Galina L. Rogova,et al.  Adaptive real-time threat assessment under uncertainty and conflict , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Inter-Disciplinary Conference on Cognitive Methods in Situation Awareness and Decision Support (CogSIMA).