The co-evolution of technology and institution in the Korean information and communications industry

The Korean IT industry has shown distinct patterns in learning mechanisms and organisational configuration throughout its entry into advanced information technology. Innovation systems in the area of information technology have also evolved along with technological capability, thereby changing the focus of technological strategies and the role of public institutions. It is found that distinctive patterns of learning and diffusion mechanisms in the case of DRAMs, TDX, and CDMA systems represent successful catch-up situations in Korea as presented in this paper. This paper characterises the stylised facts of the Korean innovation system in the IT sector and traces how technology and institutions coevolved throughout the development process. The transition from technology-using to technology-generating is not an automatic process. Cumulative learning in both technology and organisation is a critical factor to upgrade technological capabilities. The main policy implication of the paper is that it is important to design the corresponding organisational and institutional arrangement in accordance with the changing need of technological upgrading.

[1]  Richard R. Nelson,et al.  The Co-evolution of Technology, Industrial Structure, and Supporting Institutions , 1994 .

[2]  Slavo Radosevic Defining systems of innovation: a methodological discussion , 1998 .

[3]  R. Nelson,et al.  Debt Sustainability Under Catastrophic Risk: The Case for Government Budget Insurance , 1997 .

[4]  R. Wade Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization , 1991 .

[5]  Seoyong Kim Benchmarking government’s roles to assure the cooperation in collaborative technology innovation, The case of CDMA technology development , 2001 .

[6]  Bengt-Åke Lundvall,et al.  National Systems of Innovation: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning London: Pint , 1995 .

[7]  L. Kim The Dynamics of Samsung's Technological Learning in Semiconductors , 1997 .

[8]  Michael Hobday,et al.  East Asian latecomer firms: Learning the technology of electronics , 1995 .

[9]  C. Freeman Technology, policy, and economic performance , 1987 .

[10]  Linsu Kim,et al.  Stages of development of industrial technology in a developing country: A model , 1980 .

[11]  Seungwoo Seo,et al.  Recommendations from the commercialization of government-sponsored telecommunications R&D with multiple development cycles in Korea , 1998 .

[12]  J. Mathews,et al.  Tiger Technology: The Creation of a Semiconductor Industry in East Asia , 2000 .

[13]  Myung-Hwan Rim,et al.  Transition of Latecomer Firms from Technology Users to Technology Generators: Korean Semiconductor Firms , 2000 .

[14]  A. Amsden Asia's Next Giant: South Korea and Late Industrialization , 1991 .

[15]  Youngrak Choi Dynamic Techno-Management Capability: The Case of Samsung Semiconductor Sector in Korea , 1996 .