Numeric Image Features for Detection of Aurora

The electromagnetic coupling of the solar wind, Earth's magnetic field, and the upper atmosphere allows us to study the near-Earth space phenomena by monitoring the auroral displays in the polar regions. Ground-based networks facilitate spatial and temporal resolutions that are not possible with satellite instruments-they also produce enormous amounts of data to be stored and processed. While automated image analysis methods for auroral research are beginning to emerge, the normal approach is to visually examine images and then manually label and sort the data. We revisit a key question concerning the existence of aurora in an image: Not all images contain auroral light, and the visibility to the upper atmosphere depends on cloud cover. Detection of aurora is a fundamental step to limit further processing to only those images that are of interest. We quantitatively evaluated a selection of numeric image features that have been used in earlier studies and assess a brightness-invariant feature. We achieved error rates around 6%-8% with subsecond execution times. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to report results in classifying auroral images where the Moon is allowed to be visible.

[1]  E. Donovan,et al.  Automatic classification of auroral images in substorm studies , 2006 .

[2]  Rich Caruana,et al.  An empirical evaluation of supervised learning in high dimensions , 2008, ICML '08.

[3]  Frédéric Jurie,et al.  Learning Visual Similarity Measures for Comparing Never Seen Objects , 2007, 2007 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[4]  Hermann Ney,et al.  Features for image retrieval: an experimental comparison , 2008, Information Retrieval.

[5]  Hai Tao,et al.  A novel feature descriptor invariant to complex brightness changes , 2009, CVPR.

[6]  Jaakko Hollmén,et al.  Sequential input selection algorithm for long-term prediction of time series , 2008, Neurocomputing.

[7]  Matti Pietikäinen,et al.  Multiresolution Gray-Scale and Rotation Invariant Texture Classification with Local Binary Patterns , 2002, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[8]  Haihong Hu,et al.  Spatial texture based automatic classification of dayside aurora in all-sky images , 2010 .

[9]  Martin Connors,et al.  The THEMIS all-sky imaging array—system design and initial results from the prototype imager , 2006 .

[10]  T. Pulkkinen,et al.  Observations of Substorm Electrodynamics Using the MIRACLE Network , 1998 .

[11]  Dorin Comaniciu,et al.  Real-time tracking of non-rigid objects using mean shift , 2000, Proceedings IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. CVPR 2000 (Cat. No.PR00662).

[12]  Trevor Hastie,et al.  The Elements of Statistical Learning , 2001 .

[13]  Xinbo Gao,et al.  Patchy Aurora Image Segmentation Based on ALBP and Block Threshold , 2010, 2010 20th International Conference on Pattern Recognition.

[14]  M. Syrjäsuo,et al.  Diurnal auroral occurrence statistics obtained via machine vision , 2004 .