Group decision making process for early stage evaluations of infrastructure projects using extended VIKOR method under fuzzy environment

PurposeThis paper considers the evaluations of project alternatives at the early stages of infrastructure project developments. Although it is expected to make important decisions at project early stages, it is rarely possible to obtain reliable data for exact evaluations. To deal with low quality data and the existence of uncertainties, this paper extends the evaluation problem to the fuzzy environment.MethodsWe propose group decision making process for early stage evaluations of infrastructure projects. The evaluation approach utilizes combination weighting and compromise ranking. We integrate subjective and objective weighting methods to specify criteria weights. Afterwards, we use the VIKOR method to rank alternatives in the presence of conflicting criteria.ResultsAs a case study, we illustrate the evaluation problem within a railway line reconstruction project. Specifically, the proposed approach is efficiently applied to evaluate and rank several route alternatives considered within the reconstruction project of the regional line Pančevo – Vršac at Serbian railway network.ConclusionsThe provided example illustrates the applicability of the proposed approach to deal with the evaluations at the early stage of the railway line reconstruction. The existence of uncertainties at early stages of project developments is common, so the proposed method is also applicable for other linear infrastructure in transport sector.

[1]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  VIKOR Technique: A Systematic Review of the State of the Art Literature on Methodologies and Applications , 2016 .

[2]  Aleksandra Deluka-Tibljaš,et al.  Pregled primjene metoda višekriterijske analize pri donošenju odluka o prometnoj infrastrukturi , 2013 .

[3]  P. Grasso,et al.  Application of Multicriteria Analysis to select the best highway alignment , 2000 .

[4]  Hans-Jürgen Zimmermann,et al.  Fuzzy Set Theory - and Its Applications , 1985 .

[5]  Ivan Belošević,et al.  Multicriteria decision-making in railway route planning and design , 2012 .

[6]  Omidvar Mohsen,et al.  An extended VIKOR method based on entropy measure for the failure modes risk assessment – A case study of the geothermal power plant (GPP) , 2017 .

[7]  Concha Bielza,et al.  COMPROMISE-BASED APPROACH TO ROAD PROJECT SELECTION IN MADRID METROPOLITAN AREA , 2003 .

[8]  J. Ringuest Multiobjective Optimization: Behavioral and Computational Considerations , 1992 .

[9]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING IN CIVIL ENGINEERING: PART I – A STATE-OF-THE-ART SURVEY , 2015 .

[10]  Seyed Ali Taghizadeh,et al.  Selecting the appropriate public transportation system to access the Sari International Airport by fuzzy decision making , 2013, European Transport Research Review.

[11]  Alev Taskin Gumus,et al.  A state of the art literature review of VIKOR and its fuzzy extensions on applications , 2016, Appl. Soft Comput..

[12]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Fuzzy multiple criteria decision-making techniques and applications - Two decades review from 1994 to 2014 , 2015, Expert Syst. Appl..

[13]  Nihan Çetin Demirel,et al.  Group decision making process for insurance company selection problem with extended VIKOR method under fuzzy environment , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[14]  Muhammet Gulź,et al.  A state of the art literature review of VIKOR and its fuzzy extensions on applications , 2016 .

[15]  Caroline M. Eastman,et al.  Review: Introduction to fuzzy arithmetic: Theory and applications : Arnold Kaufmann and Madan M. Gupta, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1985 , 1987, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[16]  Robert LIN,et al.  NOTE ON FUZZY SETS , 2014 .

[17]  Hu-Chen Liu,et al.  FMEA Using Uncertainty Theories and MCDM Methods , 2016 .

[18]  Francesco Filippi,et al.  Weighting methods in multi-attribute assessment of transport projects , 2009 .

[19]  P. Yu A Class of Solutions for Group Decision Problems , 1973 .

[20]  Tien-Chin Wang,et al.  Optimizing partners’ choice in IS/IT outsourcing projects: The strategic decision of fuzzy VIKOR , 2009 .

[21]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Multi‐objective decision‐making for road design , 2008 .

[22]  Marion Wiethoff,et al.  A methodology for improving road safety by novel infrastructural and invehicle technology combinations , 2012 .

[23]  Reza Banai,et al.  Public Transportation Decision-Making: A Case Analysis of the Memphis Light Rail Corridor and Route Selection with Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2006 .

[24]  Richard Bellman,et al.  Decision-making in fuzzy environment , 2012 .

[25]  Luca Persia,et al.  A methodology to assess pedestrian crossing safety , 2010 .

[26]  Reza Banai,et al.  Evaluation of land use-transportation systems with the Analytic Network Process , 2010 .

[27]  Serafim Opricovic,et al.  Fuzzy VIKOR with an application to water resources planning , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[28]  Benjamin R Sperry,et al.  Development of Multicriteria Decision Method for Evaluating High-Speed Rail Corridor , 2013 .

[29]  Hu-Chen Liu,et al.  A novel approach for failure mode and effects analysis using combination weighting and fuzzy VIKOR method , 2015, Appl. Soft Comput..

[30]  Milan Zeleny,et al.  Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) , 2004 .

[31]  Krzysztof Zima,et al.  Evaluation of Planned Construction Projects Using Fuzzy Logic , 2017 .

[32]  Solomon Tesfamariam,et al.  A review of multi-criteria decision-making methods for infrastructure management , 2014 .

[33]  Mohd Rapik Saat,et al.  Multicriteria high-speed rail route selection: application to Malaysia's high-speed rail corridor prioritization , 2015 .

[34]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[35]  Ching-Hsue Cheng,et al.  Evaluating the best main battle tank using fuzzy decision theory with linguistic criteria evaluation , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[36]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Multi-criteria decision making in civil engineering. Part II – applications , 2015 .

[37]  Chen-Tung Chen,et al.  Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment , 2000, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[38]  Tien-Chin Wang,et al.  Developing a fuzzy TOPSIS approach based on subjective weights and objective weights , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[39]  Tarik Agouti,et al.  An improved approach for association rule mining using a multi-criteria decision support system: a case study in road safety , 2017, European Transport Research Review.

[40]  Hrvoje Pilko,et al.  An Analytic Hierarchy Process Model to Evaluate Road Section Design , 2016 .

[41]  Barbara Karleuša,et al.  Review of multicriteria-analysis methods application in decision making about transport infrastructure , 2013 .

[42]  S. Farid Mousavi,et al.  Group decision making process for supplier selection with VIKOR under fuzzy environment , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[43]  Mohammad Jafar Tarokh,et al.  A fuzzy VIKOR method for supplier selection based on entropy measure for objective weighting , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[44]  F. Feizi,et al.  Mineral Potential Mapping Via TOPSIS with Hybrid AHP–Shannon Entropy Weighting of Evidence: A Case Study for Porphyry-Cu, Farmahin Area, Markazi Province, Iran , 2017, Natural Resources Research.

[45]  A. Kaufmann,et al.  Introduction to fuzzy arithmetic : theory and applications , 1986 .

[46]  Renaud Sarrazin,et al.  Applying multicriteria decision analysis to design safe road projects , 2015 .

[47]  J. M. Anton,et al.  Madrid?Valencia high-speed rail line: a route selection , 2004 .

[48]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..