Effects of Opportunities for Word Retrieval During Second Language Vocabulary Learning

Research suggests that memory for an item improves when one is allowed to retrieve the item (Slamecka & Graf, 1978). This study explored benefits of providing opportunities for target-word retrieval during second language vocabulary learning. English speakers studied new Spanish words while viewing 24 word-picture pairs. They first viewed all 24 pairs. They then viewed 12 pairs with a 6-s lag between each picture and its word so that they could attempt to retrieve the word in their mind. The other 12 pairs were presented without the lag. Posttests were administered immediately, 2 days later, and 1 week later. Results indicated higher scores in the retrieval-oriented condition. This positive effect was maintained across significant decreases in scores over time.

[1]  Robert L. Greene,et al.  Generation effects in frequency judgment. , 1988 .

[2]  Mark A. McDaniel,et al.  A contextual account of the generation effect: A three-factor theory ☆ , 1988 .

[3]  Henry L. Roediger,et al.  Chapter 7 – Retrieval Processes , 1996 .

[4]  T. S. Hyde,et al.  Differential effects of incidental tasks on the organization of recall of a list of highly associated words. , 1969 .

[5]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Differential effects of study and test trials on long-term recognition and recall , 1971 .

[6]  D. G. Payne,et al.  The generation effect: Further tests of the lexical activation hypothesis , 1986, Memory & cognition.

[7]  A. W. Melton.  Repetition and retrieval from memory. , 1967, Science.

[8]  James S. Nairne,et al.  Familiarity and Lexicality as Determinants of the Generation Effect , 1988 .

[9]  The name game: using retrieval practice to improve the learning of names. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[10]  J. Kroll,et al.  Category Interference in Translation and Picture Naming: Evidence for Asymmetric Connections Between Bilingual Memory Representations , 1994 .

[11]  Danielle S. McNamara,et al.  A Generation Advantage for Multiplication Skill and Nonword Vocabulary Acquisition. , 1998 .

[12]  Elizabeth E. Johns,et al.  The generation effect with nonwords. , 1988 .

[13]  W. O’neill,et al.  A translation-based generation effect in bilingual recall and recognition , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[14]  Robert A. Bjork,et al.  The Generation Effect: Support for a Two-Factor Theory , 1988 .

[15]  John A. Glover,et al.  The "testing" phenomenon: Not gone but nearly forgotten. , 1989 .

[16]  D. Griffith,et al.  The attentional demands of mnemonic control processes , 1976, Memory & cognition.

[17]  L. Jacoby.  On interpreting the effects of repetition: Solving a problem versus remembering a solution , 1978 .

[18]  Henry L. Roediger,et al.  Disparate Effects of Repeated Testing: Reconciling Ballard's (1913) and Bartlett's (1932) Results , 1992 .

[19]  Danielle S. McNamara,et al.  A Procedural Explanation of the Generation Effect for Simple and Difficult Multiplication Problems and Answers , 2000 .

[20]  F. Craik,et al.  Depth of processing and the retention of words , 1975 .

[21]  Murdock,et al.  The serial position effect of free recall , 1962 .

[22]  Endel Tulving,et al.  The effects of presentation and recall of material in free-recall learning , 1967 .

[23]  Bilingual Generation Effect: Variations in Participant Bilingual Type and List Type , 1997 .

[24]  William L. Cull,et al.  Expanding understanding of the expanding-pattern-of-retrieval mnemonic: Toward confidence in applicability , 1996 .

[25]  A. Healy,et al.  The time-course of the generation effect , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[26]  H. F. Spitzer.  Studies in retention. , 1939 .

[27]  Norman J. Slamucka,et al.  The generation effect when generation fails , 1983 .

[28]  Andreas Rohde,et al.  Fast mapping in early L2 lexical acquisition , 2000 .

[29]  N. J. Slamecka,et al.  The generation effect as an artifact of selective displaced rehearsal. , 1987 .

[30]  S. R. Schmidt,et al.  The negative generation effect: Delineation of a phenomenon , 1989, Memory & cognition.

[31]  M. Pressley.  Mnemonic versus Nonmnemonic Vocabulary-Learning Strategies: Additional Comparisons. , 1982 .

[32]  Charles P. Thompson,et al.  Memory for product names: The generation effect , 1981 .

[33]  Alice F. Healy,et al.  Cognitive operations and the generation effect. , 1989 .

[34]  John Lutz,et al.  An Examination of the Value of the Generation Effect for Learning New Material , 2003, The Journal of general psychology.

[35]  F. Craik,et al.  Levels of Pro-cessing: A Framework for Memory Research , 1975 .

[36]  Fraser A. Bleasdale,et al.  Retrieval difficulty and subsequent recall , 1973, Memory & cognition.

[37]  G. C. Myers,et al.  Recall in relation to retention. , 1914 .

[38]  I. Begg,et al.  The generation effect: Evidence for generalized inhibition. , 1987 .

[39]  Joe Barcroft,et al.  Semantic and structural elaboration in L2 lexical acquisition , 2002 .

[40]  L. A. McElroy,et al.  Memorial consequences of generating nonwords: Implications for semantic-memory interpretations of the generation effect , 1982 .

[41]  H. P. Bahrick.  Maintenance of knowledge: Questions about memory we forgot to ask. , 1979 .

[42]  H. P. Bahrick,et al.  Maintenance of Foreign Language Vocabulary and the Spacing Effect , 1993 .

[43]  A test of resource-allocation explanations of the generation effect , 1990 .

[44]  J M Gardiner,et al.  A generation effect with numbers rather than words , 1984, Memory & cognition.

[45]  James M. Royer.  Memory Effects for Test-Like-Events during Acquisition of Foreign Language Vocabulary , 1973 .