Utilizing Behavioral Interventions to Improve Supervision Outcomes in Community-Based Corrections

The number of offenders supervised in the community has grown significantly over the past few decades, whereas successful completions of probation and parole terms have been declining during the same time period. The current study examines the impact of rewards and sanctions on offenders in an Intensive Supervision Program (ISP). Data were collected on a random sample of 283 offenders who participated in an ISP between 2000 and 2003. Agency records, including supervision notes, violation reports, and other offender-related correspondence, were used to track offenders’ sanction and reward histories during their participation in the program. Controlling for a number of variables, the study found that the use of both sanctions and rewards led to higher success rates. Administering rewards in proportionally higher numbers than sanctions produced the best results, especially when a ratio of four or more rewards for every sanction was achieved. Correctional administrators are encouraged to identify ideological obstacles that may impede the application of behavioral techniques and to carefully train and guide line staff in the use of sanctions and rewards.

[1]  R. Rawson,et al.  Drug Courts and Contingency Management , 2001 .

[2]  Kathryn D. Morgan.  Factors associated with probation outcome , 1994 .

[3]  David Garland,et al.  The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society , 2001 .

[4]  W. K. Honig.  Operant behavior : areas of research and application , 1966 .

[5]  M. Gray,et al.  Examining Probation Violations: Who, What, and When , 2001 .

[6]  D. Marlowe,et al.  An effectiveness trial of contingency management in a felony preadjudication drug court. , 2008, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[7]  Michael Tonry,et al.  Stated and Latent Functions of ISP , 1990 .

[8]  C. Jeffery.  Criminal Behavior and Learning Theory , 2013 .

[9]  C. Lindquist,et al.  Sanctions and Rewards in Drug Court Programs: Implementation, Perceived Efficacy, and Decision Making , 2006 .

[10]  C. Spohn,et al.  THE EFFECT OF IMPRISONMENT ON RECIDIVISM RATES OF FELONY OFFENDERS: A FOCUS ON DRUG OFFENDERS* , 2002 .

[11]  Dc Washington.  National Institute of Justice. , 2010 .

[12]  P. Friedmann,et al.  Collaborative behavioral management: integration and intensification of parole and outpatient addiction treatment services in the Step’n Out study , 2009, Journal of experimental criminology.

[13]  D. W. Roncek.  Using Logit Coefficients to Obtain the Effects of Independent Variables on Changes in Probabilities , 1991 .

[14]  M. Prendergast,et al.  Interventions to Promote Successful Re-Entry Among Drug-Abusing Parolees , 2009 .

[15]  Jonathan Simon,et al.  The New Penology: Notes on the Emerging Strategy of Corrections and Its Implications , 1992 .

[16]  J. Petersilia,et al.  When Prisoners Come Home: Parole and Prisoner Reentry , 2009 .

[17]  Jeffrey Lin,et al.  Document Title: Parole Violations and Revocations in California , 2008 .

[18]  D. Marlowe.  Strategies for Administering Rewards and Sanctions , 2007 .

[19]  Kimora.  The Emerging Paradigm in Probation and Parole in the United States , 2008 .

[20]  N. Nagelkerke,et al.  A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination , 1991 .

[21]  Joan Petersilia,et al.  EMPLOY BEHAVIORAL CONTRACTING FOR “EARNED DISCHARGE” PAROLE , 2007 .

[22]  Ahmad Shamloo,et al.  Punishment , 1997 .

[23]  Paul Gendreau,et al.  The principles of effective intervention with offenders. , 1996 .

[24]  David B. Wilson,et al.  A systematic review of drug court effects on recidivism , 2007 .

[25]  Francis T. Cullen,et al.  Intensive rehabilitation supervision: The next generation in community corrections? , 1994 .

[26]  William P. McCarty,et al.  Risk Assessment and Classification of Day Reporting Center Clients , 2008 .

[27]  G. Melnick,et al.  Amity Prison-Based Therapeutic Community: 5-Year Outcomes , 2004 .

[28]  M. Prendergast,et al.  Use of vouchers to reinforce abstinence and positive behaviors among clients in a drug court treatment program. , 2008, Journal of substance abuse treatment.

[29]  C. Perkins.  National Corrections Reporting Program, 1991 , 1994 .

[30]  Wayne N Welsh.  A Multisite Evaluation of Prison-Based Therapeutic Community Drug Treatment , 2007 .

[31]  Jeremy Travis.  Beyond the Prison Gates: The State of Parole in America , 2002 .

[32]  Etc.,et al.  Families and Children , 2005 .

[33]  Eric J. Wodahl,et al.  Offender Perceptions of Graduated Sanctions , 2013 .

[34]  M. Devault.  Families and Children , 2003 .

[35]  J. Travis.  From Prison to Home - The Dimensions and Consequences of Prisoner Reentry , 2001 .

[36]  R. McCleary.  How Structural Variables Constrain the Parole Officer's Use of Discretionary Powers , 1975 .

[37]  Predictors of success and failure on intensive probation supervision , 1995 .

[38]  Joan Petersilia,et al.  A Decade of Experimenting with Intermediate Sanctions: What Have We Learned? , 1999 .

[39]  Lin Huff-Corzine,et al.  Return to the Scene of the Punishment: Recidivism of Adult Male Property Offenders on Felony Probation, 1986-1989 , 1997 .

[40]  James A. Inciardi,et al.  Five-Year Outcomes of Therapeutic Community Treatment of Drug-Involved Offenders after Release from Prison , 2004 .

[41]  Craig A. Mertler,et al.  Advanced and multivariate statistical methods: Practical application and interpretation: Sixth edition , 2001 .

[42]  B. Skinner.  Operant Behavior , 2021, Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science.

[43]  Arthur J. Lurigio,et al.  Predicting Probation Outcomes: Factors Associated with Probation Rearrest, Revocations, and Technical Violations during Supervision , 2000 .

[44]  T. Cavell.  Updating Our Approach to Parent Training. I: The Case Against Targeting Noncompliance , 2006 .

[45]  J. Whitehead.  The effectiveness of felony probation: Results from an eastern state , 1991 .

[46]  D. Shaffer.  Reconsidering Drug Court Effectiveness: A Meta-analytic Review , 2006 .

[47]  Antonio Andrés Pueyo,et al.  THE PSYCHOLOGY OF CRIMINAL CONDUCT , 2008 .

[48]  J. Kerbs,et al.  Discretionary Decision Making by Probation and Parole Officers , 2009 .

[49]  P. M. Harris,et al.  Probationer violations and officer response , 1992 .