A review of intensive mode of delivery and science subjects in Australian universities

Abstract One response to the global trend of increasing rates of student participation in tertiary education has been for universities to increase the number of intensive mode of delivery subjects available. This phenomenon extends to science subjects. Embarking on offering an undergraduate science subject in intensive mode for the first time at the Australian case example university, it was essential to first learn about good pedagogical design and practice from other educational organisations. To achieve this, a website audit of Australian universities was undertaken in tandem with a critical review of the Australian and international literature on intensive mode of delivery. While it was found that a majority of Australian universities offer science subjects in intensive mode, these subjects were primarily at the postgraduate level of study. The literature focusing on intensive mode in science was minimal. It revealed definitional ambiguity and conceptual non-uniformity as well as a range of positive, negative and inconclusive results in relation to the academic and ‘real-world’ outcomes of intensive mode. This review identifies a need for evidenced-based empirical research into the pedagogy around intensive mode for undergraduate science subjects.

[1]  J. Sawyer,et al.  Regional Summer Schools: Widening Learning Opportunities Through Intensive Courses , 2009, Australian and International Journal of Rural Education.

[2]  Block scheduled versus traditional biology teaching—an educational experiment using the water lily , 2008 .

[3]  The impact of time on art learning: Intensive vs. concurrent scheduling in higher education , 1983 .

[4]  J. Anastasi,et al.  Full-Semester and Abbreviated Summer Courses: An Evaluation of Student Performance , 2007 .

[5]  Ian Solomonides,et al.  Time on task in intensive modes of delivery , 2015 .

[6]  C. Bryson.  Supporting sessional teaching staff in the UK – to what extent is there real progress? , 2013, Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice.

[7]  W. Martin Davies,et al.  Intensive Teaching Formats: A Review. , 2006 .

[8]  J. Milligan.  An exploration of accelerated pre-registration courses in physiotherapy: perceptions of practitioners , 2010 .

[9]  Marina Harvey.  Setting The Standards For Sessional Staff: Quality Learning And Teaching , 2013, Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice.

[10]  Bill Kops.  Best Practices for Teaching in Summer Session. , 2010 .

[11]  Jane Pritchard,et al.  The variation in academics’ experiences of teaching in an intense study centre compared with their traditional university settings , 2011 .

[12]  Steven Spurling.  Compression of Semesters or Intensity of Study: What is it that Increases Student Success?. , 2001 .

[13]  Marco Adria,et al.  Technology, Preprocessing, and Resistance—A Comparative Case Study of Intensive Classroom Teaching , 2004 .

[14]  Mark A. Kretovics,et al.  A Study of Faculty Perceptions of Summer Compressed Course Teaching , 2005 .

[15]  I. Ramsay.  Intensive teaching in law subjects , 2011 .

[16]  H. Coates,et al.  Learning leaders in times of change: Academic leadership capabilities for Australian higher education , 2008 .

[17]  Stephney Whillier,et al.  Development of an intensive mode neuroanatomy unit utilising the Flipped Classroom , 2014 .

[18]  Paul L Nesbit,et al.  An analysis of student and faculty attitudes to intensive teaching , 2002 .

[19]  D. Bradley,et al.  Review of Australian Higher Education: final report , 2008 .

[20]  Michael Jay Polonsky,et al.  Marketing students' perception of traditional and intensive delivery : an exploratory study , 2007 .

[21]  D. Moriarty,et al.  A Survey of January Interim Psychology Courses , 1982 .

[22]  G. Strachan,et al.  Workforce development and renewal in Australian universities and the management of casual academic staff , 2013, Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice.

[23]  William Evans,et al.  Block Scheduling: An Evaluation of Outcomes and Impact , 2002 .

[24]  Donald G. Hackmann.  Constructivism and Block Scheduling: Making the Connection , 2004 .

[25]  A. C. Lewis,et al.  Enhancing University Summer Session Programs: The Role and Effect of Visiting Faculty , 2009 .

[26]  K. Peca.  Intensive Instruction: Lessons from the Field , 1996 .

[27]  Nicolette Lee,et al.  Accelerated Learning: A Study of Faculty and Student Experiences , 2010 .

[28]  Suzan Burton,et al.  Block or traditional? An analysis of student choice of teaching format , 2008, Journal of Management & Organization.

[29]  Adrian Austin,et al.  Impact of Course Length on Student Learning , 2006 .