Parental engagement with complementary feeding information in the United Kingdom: A qualitative evidence synthesis.

Complementary feeding is the process of introducing solid foods to milk-fed infants (also known as weaning). Current UK guidance states that complementary feeding should occur around 6 months but not before 4 months. This systematic review explores how parents in the UK, with an infant under 24 months of age, engage with sources of information and advice about complementary feeding. Engaging with sources of information can influence parents' feeding choices and so a better understanding of parents' information behaviours can improve service provisions. Six databases were searched, identifying 15 relevant qualitative studies with the predefined criteria. Data from each study were coded line by line allowing for a synthesis of higher analytical themes. Using thematic synthesis, four main themes were observed: (1) trust and rapport-parents valued information from a trusted source (2), accessibility-information needs were often time sensitive, and parents showed varying levels of understanding, (3) adapting feeding plans-often influenced by practicalities (4), being a good parent-feeding plans were changed to comply with societal ideas of 'good parenting'. The review concluded that parents receive information and advice about complementary feeding from multiple sources and are highly motivated to seek further information. The scope of this novel review explored the parental experience of finding, receiving and engaging with information sources and how this may or may not have influenced their feeding behaviours. The review has provided a new perspective to add to the growing body of literature that focuses on the experience of feeding an infant.

[1]  Justin D. Henderson,et al.  Mothers' experiences with complementary feeding: Conventional and baby-led approaches. , 2020, Nutrition & dietetics: the journal of the Dietitians Association of Australia.

[2]  M. Heys,et al.  Nurture Early for Optimal Nutrition (NEON) programme: qualitative study of drivers of infant feeding and care practices in a British-Bangladeshi population , 2020, BMJ Open.

[3]  E. Denney-Wilson,et al.  Content and Quality of Infant Feeding Smartphone Apps: Five-Year Update on a Systematic Search and Evaluation , 2020, JMIR mHealth and uHealth.

[4]  M. Hetherington,et al.  “An invisible map” - maternal perceptions of hunger, satiation and ‘enough’ in the context of baby led and traditional complementary feeding practices , 2020, Appetite.

[5]  A. Garcia,et al.  An Exploration of Complementary Feeding Practices, Information Needs and Sources , 2019, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[6]  J. Woodside,et al.  “The One Time You Have Control over What They Eat”: A Qualitative Exploration of Mothers’ Practices to Establish Healthy Eating Behaviours during Weaning , 2019, Nutrients.

[7]  P. Kearney,et al.  Solid advice: Complementary feeding experiences among disadvantaged parents in two countries. , 2019, Maternal & child nutrition.

[8]  Meredith Vanstone,et al.  Appraising Qualitative Research for Evidence Syntheses: A Compendium of Quality Appraisal Tools , 2018, Qualitative health research.

[9]  C. Houghton,et al.  Parental experiences and perceptions of infant complementary feeding: a qualitative evidence synthesis , 2017, Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity.

[10]  W. Brodribb,et al.  A qualitative systematic review of maternal infant feeding practices in transitioning from milk feeds to family foods , 2016, Maternal & child nutrition.

[11]  A. Garcia,et al.  Types of fruits and vegetables used in commercial baby foods and their contribution to sugar content. , 2016, Maternal & child nutrition.

[12]  J. W. Woo Baidal,et al.  Interventions for Childhood Obesity in the First 1,000 Days A Systematic Review. , 2016, American journal of preventive medicine.

[13]  J. W. Woo Baidal,et al.  Risk Factors for Childhood Obesity in the First 1,000 Days: A Systematic Review. , 2016, American journal of preventive medicine.

[14]  K. Maslin,et al.  A qualitative study of mothers’ perceptions of weaning and the use of commercial infant food in the United Kingdom , 2015 .

[15]  A. Anderson,et al.  'I didn't know why you had to wait': an evaluation of NHS infant-feeding workshops amongst women living in areas of high deprivation. , 2015, Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association.

[16]  M. Arden,et al.  Experiences of baby-led weaning: trust, control and renegotiation. , 2015, Maternal & child nutrition.

[17]  Elizabeth Denney-Wilson,et al.  Infant Feeding Websites and Apps: A Systematic Assessment of Quality and Content , 2015, Interactive journal of medical research.

[18]  A. Walsh,et al.  Factors influencing first-time mothers’ introduction of complementary foods: a qualitative exploration , 2015, BMC Public Health.

[19]  B. Edmonds,et al.  Systematic review of randomised controlled trials of interventions that aim to reduce the risk, either directly or indirectly, of overweight and obesity in infancy and early childhood , 2015, Maternal & child nutrition.

[20]  K. Thorpe,et al.  An Early Feeding Practices Intervention for Obesity Prevention , 2015, Pediatrics.

[21]  K. Michaelsen,et al.  Parental concerns about complementary feeding: differences according to interviews with mothers with children of 7 and 13 months of age , 2013, European Journal of Clinical Nutrition.

[22]  P. Hoddinott,et al.  Significant others, situations and infant feeding behaviour change processes: a serial qualitative interview study , 2013, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.

[23]  Amy E Brown,et al.  An exploration of experiences of mothers following a baby-led weaning style: developmental readiness for complementary foods. , 2013, Maternal & child nutrition.

[24]  S. Langley-Evans,et al.  The types of food introduced during complementary feeding and risk of childhood obesity: a systematic review , 2013, International Journal of Obesity.

[25]  S. Oliver,et al.  Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ , 2012, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[26]  H. Gage,et al.  Influences on infant feeding decisions of first-time mothers in five European countries , 2012, European Journal of Clinical Nutrition.

[27]  P. Hoddinott,et al.  A serial qualitative interview study of infant feeding experiences: idealism meets realism , 2012, BMJ Open.

[28]  M. Hetherington,et al.  Vegetables by stealth. An exploratory study investigating the introduction of vegetables in the weaning period , 2011, Appetite.

[29]  John C Mathers,et al.  Tracking of obesity-related behaviours from childhood to adulthood: A systematic review. , 2011, Maturitas.

[30]  N. Siriwardena,et al.  Parents' beliefs about appropriate infant size, growth and feeding behaviour: implications for the prevention of childhood obesity , 2010, BMC public health.

[31]  C. Hunt,et al.  Preventing obesity at weaning: parental views about the EMPOWER programme. , 2010, Child: care, health and development.

[32]  Madelynne A Arden,et al.  Conflicting influences on UK mothers' decisions to introduce solid foods to their infants. , 2009, Maternal & child nutrition.

[33]  J. Scott,et al.  Parental perceptions of feeding practices in five European countries: an exploratory study , 2007, European Journal of Clinical Nutrition.

[34]  P. Aggett,et al.  Iron Metabolism and Requirements in Early Childhood: Do We Know Enough?: A Commentary by the ESPGHAN Committee on Nutrition , 2002, Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition.

[35]  A. Harden,et al.  Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews , 2008, BMC medical research methodology.