Organizational structure and responsibility

Aim of the present paper is to provide a formal characterization of various different notions of responsibility within groups of agents (Who did that? Who gets the blame? Who is accountable for that? etc.). To pursue this aim, the papers proposes an organic analysis of organized collective agency by tackling the issues of organizational structure, role enactment, organizational activities, task-division and task-allocation. The result consists in a semantic framework based on dynamic logic in which all these concepts can be represented and in which various notions of responsibility find a formalization. The background motivation of the work consists in those responsibility-related issues which are of particular interest for the theory and development of multi-agent systems.

[1]  Philip Selznick Foundations of the Theory of Organization , 1948 .

[2]  Frédéric Cuppens,et al.  Towards a logical formalization of responsibility , 1997, ICAIL '97.

[3]  O. Morgenstern,et al.  Prolegomena to a Theory of Organization , 1951 .

[4]  Rino Falcone,et al.  From Task Delegation to Role Delegation , 1997, AI*IA.

[5]  A. B. Sørensen Mathematical Models in Sociology , 1978 .

[6]  Norman,et al.  Structural Models: An Introduction to the Theory of Directed Graphs. , 1966 .

[7]  Victor R. Lesser,et al.  Designing a Family of Coordination Algorithms , 1997, ICMAS.

[8]  Frank Dignum,et al.  Designing a Deontic Logic of Deadlines , 2004, DEON.

[9]  Frank Dignum,et al.  Collective Obligations and Agents: Who Gets the Blame? , 2004, DEON.

[10]  John-Jules Ch. Meyer,et al.  A different approach to deontic logic: deontic logic viewed as a variant of dynamic logic , 1987, Notre Dame J. Formal Log..

[11]  Andrew J. I. Jones,et al.  Action concepts for describing organised interaction , 1997, Proceedings of the Thirtieth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[12]  Andrew J. I. Jones,et al.  RESPONSIBILITY FOR ACTION IN ORGANISATIONS: A FORMAL MODEL , 2003 .

[13]  John Zeleznikow,et al.  Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law , 1997 .

[14]  Mehdi Dastani,et al.  Foundations of organizational structure in multi-agent systems , 2005, AAMAS 2005.

[15]  C. Castelfranchi The Micro-Macro Constitution of Power , 2003 .

[16]  Frank Dignum,et al.  Autonomous agents with norms , 1999, Artificial Intelligence and Law.

[17]  Mario Paolucci,et al.  Responsibility for Societies of Agents , 2004, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[18]  Virginia Dignum A Model for Organizational Interaction , 2003 .

[19]  Anthony Giddens,et al.  Social theory and modern sociology , 1988 .

[20]  Frank Harary,et al.  Graph Theory , 2016 .

[21]  Frank Dignum,et al.  Foundations of organizational structures in multiagent systems , 2005, AAMAS '05.

[22]  L. Royakkers Extending Deontic Logic for the Formalisation of Legal Rules , 1998 .

[23]  Frank Dignum,et al.  Meeting the Deadline: Why, When and How , 2004, FAABS.

[24]  Thomas J. Fararo,et al.  Reflections on Mathematical Sociology , 1997 .

[25]  Andrew J. I. Jones,et al.  Action Concepts for Describing Organised Interaction , 1997, HICSS.

[26]  W. van der Hoek,et al.  Epistemic logic for AI and computer science , 1995, Cambridge tracts in theoretical computer science.

[27]  Barbara Dunin-Keplicz,et al.  Evolution of collective commitment during reconfiguration , 2002, AAMAS '02.

[28]  Richard E. Hayes,et al.  Power to the Edge: Command, Control in the Information Age , 2003 .

[29]  Marek J. Sergot,et al.  A Formal Characterisation of Institutionalised Power , 1996, Log. J. IGPL.

[30]  Victor R. Lesser,et al.  A survey of multi-agent organizational paradigms , 2004, The Knowledge Engineering Review.

[31]  Frank Dignum,et al.  A Modal Approach to Intentions, Commitments and Obligations: Intention plus Commitment Yields Obligation , 1996, DEON.

[32]  Frank Dignum,et al.  Negations of Transactions and Their Use in the Specification of Dynamic and Deontic Integrity Constraints , 1990 .

[33]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  The Gaia Methodology for Agent-Oriented Analysis and Design , 2000, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems.

[34]  Christopher A. Rouff,et al.  Formal Approaches to Agent-Based Systems , 2001, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.