Environmentally sound resource valuation for a more sustainable international trade: Case of argentine maize

Abstract This study analyzed costs and benefits for Argentina when trading maize grain. Assigning an appropriate value to traded resources involves a comprehensive assessment of all kinds of sources driving the process, in order to avoid their misappropriation and non-profitable use, while at the same time enhancing the environmental performance of the region for the long term. Increasing amounts of slowly-renewable and non-renewable resources invested in producing intensive cash crops do not necessarily contribute to further development of local enterprises, nor does this strategy consider valuable contributions by local ecosystem services. The emergy method was applied to assess resource and environmental support used in production and trade of maize grain in the northern part of Argentina’s Pampas Region, in years 2009–10 and 2012–13. Exports were calculated for commercial periods 2010–11 and 2013–14. Results showed that intermediate organizations trading with importing countries through international grain traders (Emergy–to-Exchange Ratio, EER, for Argentina = 0.51) exported more environmental resources (emergy associated with exported grain) than emergy imports associated with monetary returns from traders to Argentina. This situation places the country in an unfair exchange. When trade was performed through national trade organizations, the EER = 0.91, resulting in a smaller disparity. Resource trade imbalance clearly appears when it is measured in emergy terms but not when it is accounted for in monetary units. This study provides data on which to open discussion and inform trade and production strategies that could help Argentina avoid jeopardizing its own natural resources in the long term.

[1]  Mark T. Brown,et al.  Emergy-based indices and ratios to evaluate sustainability: monitoring economies and technology toward environmentally sound innovation , 1997 .

[2]  Sergio Ulgiati,et al.  Sustainable biomass production: A comparison between Gross Energy Requirement and Emergy Synthesis methods , 2009 .

[3]  Mark T. Brown,et al.  Monitoring patterns of sustainability in natural and man-made ecosystems , 1998 .

[4]  Benedetto Rugani,et al.  SCALE: Software for CALculating Emergy based on life cycle inventories , 2013 .

[5]  R. D. Groot,et al.  A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services , 2002 .

[6]  N. Ramankutty,et al.  Farming the planet: 1. Geographic distribution of global agricultural lands in the year 2000 , 2008 .

[7]  Charles Francis,et al.  How land allocation and technology innovation affect the sustainability of agriculture in Argentina Pampas: An expanded life cycle analysis , 2015 .

[8]  I. Monterroso,et al.  ''Transgenic treadmill": Responses to the emergence and spread of glyphosate-resistant johnsongrass in Argentina , 2009 .

[9]  Howard T. Odum,et al.  Environmental Accounting: Emergy and Environmental Decision Making , 1995 .

[10]  G. Brundtland,et al.  Our common future , 1987 .

[11]  Federico Maria Pulselli,et al.  Emergy and ecosystem services: A national biogeographical assessment , 2014 .

[12]  Stewart A.W. Diemont,et al.  Emergy evaluation of the performance and sustainability of three agricultural systems with different scales and management , 2006 .

[13]  Hanne Østergård,et al.  Development of concepts for human labour accounting in Emergy Assessment and other Environmental Sustainability Assessment methods , 2016 .

[14]  P. Sutton,et al.  Changes in the global value of ecosystem services , 2014 .

[15]  Amalia Zucaro,et al.  Shared wealth or nobody's land? The worth of natural capital and ecosystem services , 2011 .

[16]  Sergio Ulgiati,et al.  Energy quality, emergy, and transformity: H.T. Odum’s contributions to quantifying and understanding systems , 2004 .

[17]  Sergio Ulgiati,et al.  Labor and Services as Information Carriers in Emergy-LCA Accounting , 2014 .

[18]  Jingzheng Ren,et al.  Eco-Benefits Assessment on Urban Industrial Symbiosis based on Material Flows Analysis and Emergy Evaluation Approach: A Case of Liuzhou City, China , 2017 .

[19]  Sergio Ulgiati,et al.  Emergy Analysis and Environmental Accounting , 2004 .

[20]  Howard T. Odum,et al.  The Energetic Basis for Valuation of Ecosystem Services , 2000, Ecosystems.

[21]  R. O'Neill,et al.  The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital , 1997, Nature.

[22]  Enrique Ortega,et al.  Emergy assessment of integrated production systems of grains, pig and fish in small farms in the South Brazil , 2006 .

[23]  Y. Geng,et al.  An emergy and decomposition assessment of China-Japan trade: Driving forces and environmental imbalance , 2017 .

[24]  S. Ulgiati,et al.  Environmental assessment of maize production alternatives: Traditional, intensive and GMO-based cropping patterns , 2015 .

[25]  D. Tilley,et al.  The eco-price: How environmental emergy equates to currency , 2014 .

[26]  C. Francis,et al.  Emergy evaluation of grazing cattle in Argentina's Pampas , 2007 .

[27]  Yong Geng,et al.  Regional disparities in the Chinese economy. An emergy evaluation of provincial international trade , 2017 .

[28]  E. Trigo,et al.  Ten years of genetically modified crops in Argentine agriculture , 2006 .

[29]  Edward C. Lefroy,et al.  Emergy evaluation of three cropping systems in southwestern Australia , 2003 .

[30]  Mark T. Brown,et al.  Predicting national sustainability: The convergence of energetic, economic and environmental realities , 2009 .

[31]  Simone Bastianoni,et al.  Individual based emergy analysis: A Lagrangian model of energy memory , 2012 .

[32]  Torbjörn Rydberg,et al.  Emergy evaluation on the production, processing and export of coffee in Nicaragua , 2006 .

[33]  G. C. Rótolo,et al.  Time to re-think the GMO revolution in agriculture , 2015, Ecol. Informatics.

[34]  P. Mcmichael,et al.  Contemporary Contradictions of the Global Development Project: geopolitics, global ecology and the ‘development climate’ , 2009 .

[35]  T. Pinto-Correia,et al.  Emergy analysis of a silvo-pastoral system, a case study in southern Portugal , 2016, Agroforestry Systems.

[36]  J. Clapp,et al.  Cereal Secrets: The world’s largest grain traders and global agriculture , 2012 .

[37]  Sergio Ulgiati,et al.  Understanding the global economic crisis: A biophysical perspective , 2011 .

[38]  Howard T. Odum,et al.  Environment, Power, and Society for the Twenty-First Century: The Hierarchy of Energy , 2007 .

[39]  O. Le Corre,et al.  Exact computation of emergy based on a mathematical reinterpretation of the rules of emergy algebra , 2012 .

[40]  Arjen Y. Hoekstra,et al.  The global component of freshwater demand and supply: an assessment of virtual water flows between nations as a result of trade in agricultural and industrial products , 2008 .

[41]  Enrique Ortega,et al.  Emergy and fair trade assessment of soybean production and processing in Brazil , 2007 .

[42]  Mark T. Brown,et al.  Emergy Measures of Carrying Capacity to Evaluate Economic Investments , 2001 .

[43]  Simone Bastianoni,et al.  Sustainability of poultry production using the emergy approach: Comparison of conventional and organic rearing systems , 2006 .