Performance evaluation of urban turf irrigation smartphone app

A new smartphone turf app was field tested in South Florida.Results showed water savings with the app comparable to evapotranspiration controllers.A water conservation option in the app offers additional seasonal water savings when rainfall exceeds evapotranspiration. Data and technology are available to support a real-time irrigation smartphone app for turf that would result in more efficient irrigation scheduling which is needed to reduce water volumes applied and increase irrigation water conservation. Objectives were to (1) develop a turf irrigation smartphone app for warm season turf that would generate real-time irrigation schedules for users to program automatic timers and (2) evaluate app performance in regards to turf quality and water volumes applied with a field plot study. A smartphone app was developed and tested in a plot study in Homestead, Florida, USA, from December 2013 to November 2014. Study treatments included different irrigation scheduling methods: time-based schedule, smartphone app, and two on-site evapotranspiration (ET) controllers. Results indicated that the app and ET controllers resulted in significantly lower irrigation depths compared to the time-based treatment, ranging in water savings from 42% to 57%. The difference among the app and ET controllers was how rainfall was integrated into the schedule. Use of the seasonal water conservation model in the smartphone app is recommended to compensate for the lack of on-site rainfall measurements in the generated irrigation schedule.

[1]  Michael D. Dukes,et al.  Accuracy of Reference Evapotranspiration Estimation by Two Irrigation Controllers in a Humid Climate , 2014 .

[2]  Melissa B. Haley,et al.  Residential Irrigation Water Use in Central Florida , 2007 .

[3]  Qingwu Xue,et al.  Morphological and Physiological Responses of St. Augustine Grass Cultivars to Different Levels of Soil Moisture , 2013 .

[4]  Michael D. Dukes,et al.  Irrigation scheduling performance by evapotranspiration-based controllers , 2010 .

[5]  Michael D. Dukes,et al.  Bahiagrass crop coefficients from eddy correlation measurements in central Florida , 2009, Irrigation Science.

[6]  L. S. Pereira,et al.  Crop evapotranspiration : guidelines for computing crop water requirements , 1998 .

[7]  Michael D. Dukes,et al.  Evaluating irrigation applied and nitrogen leached using different smart irrigation technologies on bahiagrass (Paspalumnotatum) , 2013, Irrigation Science.

[8]  Michael D. Dukes,et al.  Precision of soil moisture sensor irrigation controllers under field conditions , 2010 .

[9]  Michael D. Dukes,et al.  Sensor-Based Automation of Irrigation on Bermudagrass during Dry Weather Conditions , 2008 .

[10]  Michael D. Dukes,et al.  Water conservation potential of smart irrigation controllers on St. Augustinegrass , 2009 .

[11]  Michael D. Dukes,et al.  Net irrigation requirements for Florida turfgrasses , 2013, Irrigation Science.

[12]  Michael D. Dukes,et al.  Water Conservation Potential of Landscape Irrigation Smart Controllers , 2012 .

[13]  J. Monteith Evaporation and environment. , 1965, Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology.

[14]  M. Dukes,et al.  Interpretation of Soil Moisture Content to Determine Soil Field Capacity and Avoid Over-Irrigating Sandy Soils Using Soil Moisture Sensors 1 , 2010 .

[15]  Zafer Boybeyi,et al.  A three-dimensional numerical sensitivity study of convection over the Florida peninsula , 1992 .

[16]  Michael D. Dukes,et al.  Water Conservation Potential of Smart Irrigation Controllers , 2010 .

[17]  Michael D. Dukes,et al.  Irrigation of Residential Landscapes Using the Toro Intelli-Sense Controller in Southwest Florida , 2014 .

[18]  David D. Bosch,et al.  RAINFALL CHARACTERISTICS AND SPATIAL CORRELATION FOR THE GEORGIA COASTAL PLAIN , 1999 .

[19]  D. A. Devitt,et al.  Residential Water Savings Associated with Satellite-Based ET Irrigation Controllers , 2008 .