Decentralized Direction of Arrival Estimation

Direction-of-arrival (DOA) estimation using partly calibrated arrays composed of multiple subarrays is employed in various practical applications, such as radar, sonar, and seismic exploration. The state-of-the-art DOA estimation algorithms require the measurements of all sensors to be available at a processing center (PC). The processing power of the PC and the communication bandwidth of the subarrays increase with the number of sensors. Thus, such centralized algorithms do not scale well with the number of sensors. In this thesis, decentralized DOA estimation algorithms for partly calibrated arrays are introduced to avoid the drawbacks of the centralized algorithms. In decentralized DOA estimation, each subarray is assumed to possess modest processing power and to be able to communicate with the subarrays in its vicinity. Rather than sending the raw measurement to the PC, the subarrays process their measurements and communicate among each other to achieve the estimation task. In this dissertation, decentralized DOA estimation from the second order statistics of the measurements in two processing schemes, namely, coherent and non-coherent processing is considered. In coherent processing, the whole array covariance matrix including the inter-subarray covariance matrices is available, whereas only the subarray covariance matrices are available in non-coherent processing. The DOA estimation performance of coherent processing is superior to that of non-coherent processing, since more data is available in coherent processing, that is the inter-subarray covariance matrices. However, coherent processing is more restrictive than non-coherent processing, e.g., for coherent processing the subarrays must be synchronized in time. For coherent processing, decentralized DOA estimation is achieved based on the recently introduced decentralized power method for the eigendecomposition of the sample covariance matrix. Performance analysis of the decentralized power method is presented. An analytical expression of the second order statistics of the eigenvectors and eigenvalues obtained from the decentralized power method, which is required for computing the mean square error (MSE) of subspace-based estimators, is derived. Further, the decentralized ESPRIT algorithm, which yields fully decentralized DOA estimates based on the decentralized power method, is introduced. An asymptotic analytical expression of the MSE of DOA estimators using the decentralized ESPRIT algorithm is derived. Similar to the conventional ESPRIT algorithm, the decentralized ESPRIT algorithm requires a shift-invariant array structure. Using interpolation, the decentralized ESPRIT algorithm is generalized to arbitrary array geometries. The decentralized ESPRIT algorithm inherits the following shortcomings of the decentralized power method: (1) the large communication cost required by the power method to compute each eigenvector, (2) the power method is a batch-based algorithm, whereas in tracking applications, online algorithms are favored. To mitigate the aforementioned shortcomings, two decentralized eigendecomposition algorithms are proposed, which achieve lower communication cost and online update of the eigenvectors and eigenvalues of the measurement covariance matrix. The decentralized ESPRIT algorithm requires the number of sources to be available beforehand. A decentralized source enumeration algorithm is introduced, which in contrast to the conventional source enumeration algorithms, does not require the computation of all the eigenvalues of the measurement covariance matrix. As an alternative, for fully calibrated arrays, the decentralized Root-MUSIC algorithm is introduced, which exploit the structure of the array. An asymptotic analytical expression of the MSE of DOA estimates obtained from the decentralized Root-MUSIC algorithm is derived. For non-coherent processing, two DOA estimators are presented, namely, the Maximum Likelihood estimator (MLE) and a computationally simpler approach based on sparse signal representation (SSR). A sufficient condition for the unique identifiability of the sources in the non-coherent processing scheme is presented, which shows that under mild conditions, the number of sources identifiable by the system of subarrays is larger than the number identifiable by each individual subarray. This property of non-coherent processing has not been investigated before, where the state-of-theart non-coherent DOA estimation algorithms fail if the individual subarrays can not identify the sources. Moreover, the Cramer-Rao Bound (CRB) for the non-coherent measurement model is derived and is used to assess the performance of the proposed DOA estimators. The behaviour of the CRB at high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is analyzed. In contrast to coherent processing, the in this case CRB approaches zero at high SNR only if at least one subarray can identify the sources individually. Finally, the conventional non-coherent DOA estimation scenario, where all the subarrays are uniform linear and can identify the sources, is considered. Two DOA estimation algorithms, which outperform the state-of-the-art non-coherent DOA estimators, are presented.

[1]  H. Robbins,et al.  Application of the Method of Mixtures to Quadratic Forms in Normal Variates , 1949 .

[2]  G. Box Some Theorems on Quadratic Forms Applied in the Study of Analysis of Variance Problems, I. Effect of Inequality of Variance in the One-Way Classification , 1954 .

[3]  J. Capon High-resolution frequency-wavenumber spectrum analysis , 1969 .

[4]  V. Pisarenko The Retrieval of Harmonics from a Covariance Function , 1973 .

[5]  G. Stewart Simultaneous iteration for computing invariant subspaces of non-Hermitian matrices , 1976 .

[6]  J. Kruskal Three-way arrays: rank and uniqueness of trilinear decompositions, with application to arithmetic complexity and statistics , 1977 .

[7]  H. Solomon,et al.  Distribution of a Sum of Weighted Chi-Square Variables , 1977 .

[8]  R. O. Schmidt,et al.  Multiple emitter location and signal Parameter estimation , 1986 .

[9]  Alexander Graham,et al.  Kronecker Products and Matrix Calculus: With Applications , 1981 .

[10]  R. Muirhead Aspects of Multivariate Statistical Theory , 1982, Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics.

[11]  Arthur Jay Barabell,et al.  Improving the resolution performance of eigenstructure-based direction-finding algorithms , 1983, ICASSP.

[12]  D. A. Jones Statistical analysis of empirical models fitted by optimization , 1983 .

[13]  Gene H. Golub,et al.  Matrix computations , 1983 .

[14]  R. Farebrother The Distribution of a Positive Linear Combination of X2 Random Variables , 1984 .

[15]  Thomas Kailath,et al.  Decentralized processing in sensor arrays , 1985, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[16]  Yoram Bresler,et al.  Exact maximum likelihood parameter estimation of superimposed exponential signals in noise , 1986, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[17]  Tapan K. Sarkar,et al.  A Generalized Approach to Direction Finding , 1986, MILCOM 1986 - IEEE Military Communications Conference: Communications-Computers: Teamed for the 90's.

[18]  Petre Stoica,et al.  MUSIC, maximum likelihood and Cramer-Rao bound , 1988, ICASSP-88., International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[19]  A. Wood An F Approximation to the Distribution of a Linear Combination of Chi-squared Variables. , 1989 .

[20]  Thomas Kailath,et al.  ESPRIT-estimation of signal parameters via rotational invariance techniques , 1989, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[21]  Ilan Ziskind,et al.  On unique localization of multiple sources by passive sensor arrays , 1989, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[22]  Charles R. Johnson Matrix theory and applications , 1990 .

[23]  Rangasami L. Kashyap,et al.  Robust decentralized direction-of-arrival estimation in contaminated noise , 1990, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[24]  P. Stoica,et al.  Maximum Likelhood Methods for Direction-of- Arrival Estimation , 1990 .

[25]  Benjamin Friedlander,et al.  Direction finding using an interpolated array , 1990, International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[26]  A. Weiss,et al.  The interpolated ESPRIT algorithm for direction finding , 1991, 17th Convention of Electrical and Electronics Engineers in Israel.

[27]  Torsten Söderström,et al.  Statistical analysis of decentralized MUSIC , 1992 .

[28]  A. Akritas Sylvester''s forgotten form of the resultant , 1993 .

[29]  Thomas Kailath,et al.  Beamspace ESPRIT , 1994, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[30]  Arye Nehorai,et al.  Identifiability in Array Processing Models with Vector-Sensor Applications , 1994, IEEE Seventh SP Workshop on Statistical Signal and Array Processing.

[31]  Stephen M. Watt,et al.  The singular value decomposition for polynomial systems , 1995, ISSAC '95.

[32]  R. Tibshirani Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso , 1996 .

[33]  M. Viberg,et al.  Two decades of array signal processing research: the parametric approach , 1996, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[34]  Bhaskar D. Rao,et al.  Sparse signal reconstruction from limited data using FOCUSS: a re-weighted minimum norm algorithm , 1997, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[35]  Anthony J. Weiss,et al.  On the achievable localization accuracy of multiple sources at high SNR , 1997, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[36]  M. Wax,et al.  Direction Finding with Fewer Receivers , 1999 .

[37]  Karim Abed-Meraim,et al.  A New Look at the Power Method for Fast Subspace Tracking , 1999, Digit. Signal Process..

[38]  Jack Dongarra,et al.  Templates for the Solution of Algebraic Eigenvalue Problems , 2000, Software, environments, tools.

[39]  Martin Haardt,et al.  Unitary root-MUSIC with a real-valued eigendecomposition: a theoretical and experimental performance study , 2000, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[40]  P. Stoica,et al.  The stochastic CRB for array processing: a textbook derivation , 2001, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[41]  Xiaoming Huo,et al.  Uncertainty principles and ideal atomic decomposition , 2001, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[42]  D. Brillinger Time series - data analysis and theory , 1981, Classics in applied mathematics.

[43]  Abdelhak M. Zoubir,et al.  Detection of sources using bootstrap techniques , 2002, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[44]  Z. Luo,et al.  Robust array interpolation using second-order cone programming , 2002, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[45]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Fast linear iterations for distributed averaging , 2003, 42nd IEEE International Conference on Decision and Control (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37475).

[46]  Marius Pesavento,et al.  A new approach to array interpolation by generation of artificial shift invariances: interpolated ESPRIT , 2003, 2003 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2003. Proceedings. (ICASSP '03)..

[47]  Sanjay Kumar Madria,et al.  Sensor networks: an overview , 2003 .

[48]  R.W. Brodersen,et al.  Implementation issues in spectrum sensing for cognitive radios , 2004, Conference Record of the Thirty-Eighth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers, 2004..

[49]  Chong Meng Samson See,et al.  Direction-of-arrival estimation in partly calibrated subarray-based sensor arrays , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[50]  Daniel R. Fuhrmann,et al.  Generalizing MUSIC and MVDR for multiple noncoherent arrays , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[51]  Ivan Stojmenovic,et al.  Handbook of Sensor Networks: Algorithms and Architectures , 2005, Handbook of Sensor Networks.

[52]  Dmitry M. Malioutov,et al.  A sparse signal reconstruction perspective for source localization with sensor arrays , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[53]  R. Tandra,et al.  Fundamental limits on detection in low SNR under noise uncertainty , 2005, 2005 International Conference on Wireless Networks, Communications and Mobile Computing.

[54]  A. Ghasemi,et al.  Collaborative spectrum sensing for opportunistic access in fading environments , 2005, First IEEE International Symposium on New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks, 2005. DySPAN 2005..

[55]  J. Tropp Algorithms for simultaneous sparse approximation. Part II: Convex relaxation , 2006, Signal Process..

[56]  Michael Elad,et al.  Stable recovery of sparse overcomplete representations in the presence of noise , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[57]  M. Yuan,et al.  Model selection and estimation in regression with grouped variables , 2006 .

[58]  A. Stegeman,et al.  On Kruskal's uniqueness condition for the Candecomp/Parafac decomposition , 2007 .

[59]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Distributed average consensus with least-mean-square deviation , 2007, J. Parallel Distributed Comput..

[60]  Reza Olfati-Saber,et al.  Consensus and Cooperation in Networked Multi-Agent Systems , 2007, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[61]  E.J. Candes,et al.  An Introduction To Compressive Sampling , 2008, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[62]  H. Krim,et al.  The decentralized estimation of the sample covariance , 2008, 2008 42nd Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers.

[63]  M. Kowalski Sparse regression using mixed norms , 2009 .

[64]  Kaushik Mahata,et al.  Direction-of-arrival estimation using a mixed ℓ₂,₀ norm approximation | NOVA. The University of Newcastle's Digital Repository , 2010 .

[65]  Masoumeh Nasiri-Kenari,et al.  Multiple antenna spectrum sensing in cognitive radios , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[66]  L. Scharf,et al.  Statistical Signal Processing of Complex-Valued Data: The Theory of Improper and Noncircular Signals , 2010 .

[67]  Marius Pesavento,et al.  Direction-of-arrival estimation and array calibration for partly-calibrated arrays , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP).

[68]  M. Pesavento,et al.  A new direction-of-arrival estimation and calibration method for arrays composed of multiple identical subarrays , 2011, 2011 IEEE 12th International Workshop on Signal Processing Advances in Wireless Communications.

[69]  A. Robert Calderbank,et al.  Sensitivity to Basis Mismatch in Compressed Sensing , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[70]  Jian Li,et al.  SPICE: A Sparse Covariance-Based Estimation Method for Array Processing , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[71]  M. Kahaei,et al.  Direction-Of-Arrival Estimation Using AMLSS Method , 2012, IEEE Latin America Transactions.

[72]  Slawomir Stanczak,et al.  Decentralized largest eigenvalue test for multi-sensor signal detection , 2012, 2012 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM).

[73]  H. B. Mitchell Data Fusion: Concepts and Ideas , 2012 .

[74]  Fazel Naghdy,et al.  Coordination in wireless sensor-actuator networks: A survey , 2012, J. Parallel Distributed Comput..

[75]  Abdelhak M. Zoubir,et al.  Decentralized direction finding using partly calibrated arrays , 2013, 21st European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO 2013).

[76]  Abdelhak M. Zoubir,et al.  Flexible Detection Criterion for Source Enumeration in Array Processing , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[77]  Abdelhak M. Zoubir,et al.  Decentralized direction finding using Lanczos method , 2014, 2014 IEEE 8th Sensor Array and Multichannel Signal Processing Workshop (SAM).

[78]  Marius Pesavento,et al.  Direction finding and array calibration based on sparse reconstruction in partly calibrated arrays , 2014, 2014 IEEE 8th Sensor Array and Multichannel Signal Processing Workshop (SAM).

[79]  Yonina C. Eldar,et al.  Non-Coherent Direction of Arrival Estimation from Magnitude-Only Measurements , 2015, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[80]  Abdelhak M. Zoubir,et al.  Decentralized direction-of-arrival estimation for arbitrary array geometries , 2016, 2016 24th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO).