Optic Flow Cues Guide Flight in Birds

Although considerable effort has been devoted to investigating how birds migrate over large distances, surprisingly little is known about how they tackle so successfully the moment-to-moment challenges of rapid flight through cluttered environments [1]. It has been suggested that birds detect and avoid obstacles [2] and control landing maneuvers [3-5] by using cues derived from the image motion that is generated in the eyes during flight. Here we investigate the ability of budgerigars to fly through narrow passages in a collision-free manner, by filming their trajectories during flight in a corridor where the walls are decorated with various visual patterns. The results demonstrate, unequivocally and for the first time, that birds negotiate narrow gaps safely by balancing the speeds of image motion that are experienced by the two eyes and that the speed of flight is regulated by monitoring the speed of image motion that is experienced by the two eyes. These findings have close parallels with those previously reported for flying insects [6-13], suggesting that some principles of visual guidance may be shared by all diurnal, flying animals.

[1]  P. R. Green,et al.  Optic flow-field variables trigger landing in hawk but not in pigeons , 1990, Naturwissenschaften.

[2]  M. Srinivasan,et al.  Motion cues provide the bee's visual world with a third dimension , 1988, Nature.

[3]  Jean-Yves Bouguet,et al.  Camera calibration toolbox for matlab , 2001 .

[4]  M. Srinivasan,et al.  Range perception through apparent image speed in freely flying honeybees , 1991, Visual Neuroscience.

[5]  Mandyam V Srinivasan,et al.  Honeybees as a model for the study of visually guided flight, navigation, and biologically inspired robotics. , 2011, Physiological reviews.

[6]  M. Srinivasan,et al.  Visual regulation of ground speed and headwind compensation in freely flying honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) , 2006, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[7]  Charles M Higgins,et al.  The spatial frequency tuning of optic-flow-dependent behaviors in the bumblebee Bombus impatiens , 2010, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[8]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  Engineering Statistics , 2004, Technometrics.

[9]  M V Srinivasan,et al.  Honeybee navigation: nature and calibration of the "odometer". , 2000, Science.

[10]  A. Tamhane,et al.  Multiple Comparison Procedures , 1989 .

[11]  David N. Lee,et al.  VISUAL CONTROL OF VELOCITY OF APPROACH BY PIGEONS WHEN LANDING , 1993 .

[12]  M. V. Srinivasan,et al.  Freely flying honeybees use image motion to estimate object distance , 1989, Naturwissenschaften.

[13]  H. Keselman,et al.  Multiple Comparison Procedures , 2005 .

[14]  Michael H Dickinson,et al.  Visual Edge Orientation Shapes Free-Flight Behavior in Drosophila , 2007, Fly.

[15]  Zhang,et al.  Honeybee navigation en route to the goal: visual flight control and odometry , 1996, The Journal of experimental biology.

[16]  D. N. Lee,et al.  Aerial docking by hummingbirds , 1991, Naturwissenschaften.

[17]  Carolyn Pillers Dobler,et al.  The Practice of Statistics , 2001, Technometrics.

[18]  Martin Egelhaaf,et al.  Gaze Strategy in the Free Flying Zebra Finch (Taeniopygia guttata) , 2008, PloS one.

[19]  Svetha Venkatesh,et al.  How honeybees make grazing landings on flat surfaces , 2000, Biological Cybernetics.

[20]  M. Srinivasan,et al.  Visual control of flight speed in honeybees , 2005, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[21]  Geoffrey Portelli,et al.  Honeybees' Speed Depends on Dorsal as Well as Lateral, Ventral and Frontal Optic Flows , 2011, PloS one.