Therapeutic value of clofarabine in younger and middle-aged (18-65 years) adults with newly diagnosed AML.

Clofarabine has demonstrated antileukemic activity in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) but has yet to be critically evaluated in younger adults in the frontline with standard chemotherapy. We compared 2 induction regimens in newly diagnosed patients ages 18 to 65 with acute myeloid leukemia (AML)/high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes, that is, idarubicine-cytarabine (cycle I) and amsacrine-cytarabine (cycle II) without or with clofarabine (10 mg/m2 on days 1-5 of each of both cycles). Consolidation involved chemotherapy with or without hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Event-free survival (EFS, primary endpoint) and other clinical endpoints and toxicities were assessed. We randomized 402 and 393 evaluable patients to the control or clofarabine induction treatment arms. Complete remission rates (89%) did not differ but were attained faster with clofarabine (66% vs 75% after cycle I). Clofarabine added grades 3 to 4 toxicities and delayed hematological recovery. At a median follow-up of 36 months, the study reveals no differences in overall survival and EFS between the control (EFS, 35% ± 3 [standard error] at 4 years) and clofarabine treatments (38% ± 3) but a markedly reduced relapse rate (44% ± 3 vs 35% ± 3) in favor of clofarabine and an increased death probability in remission (15% ± 2 vs 22% ± 3). In the subgroup analyses, clofarabine improved overall survival and EFS for European Leukemia Net (ELN) 2010 intermediate I prognostic risk AML (EFS, 26% ± 4 vs 40% ± 5 at 4 years; Cox P = .002) and for the intermediate risk genotype NPM1 wild-type/FLT3 without internal-tandem duplications (EFS, 18% ± 5 vs 40% ± 7; Cox P < .001). Clofarabine improves survival in subsets of intermediate-risk AML only. HOVON-102 study is registered at Netherlands Trial Registry #NTR2187.

[1]  E. Estey,et al.  Current challenges in clinical development of "targeted therapies": the case of acute myeloid leukemia. , 2015, Blood.

[2]  E. Vellenga,et al.  Comparative therapeutic value of post-remission approaches in patients with acute myeloid leukemia aged 40–60 years , 2014, Leukemia.

[3]  M. Konopleva,et al.  Clofarabine, idarubicin, and cytarabine (CIA) as frontline therapy for patients ≤60 years with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia , 2013, American journal of hematology.

[4]  R. Hills,et al.  Clofarabine doubles the response rate in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia but does not improve survival. , 2013, Blood.

[5]  C. Craddock,et al.  Addition of gemtuzumab ozogamicin to induction chemotherapy improves survival in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  R. Collins,et al.  Clofarabine plus cytarabine compared with cytarabine alone in older patients with relapsed or refractory acute myelogenous leukemia: results from the CLASSIC I Trial. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  H. Dombret,et al.  Effect of gemtuzumab ozogamicin on survival of adult patients with de-novo acute myeloid leukaemia (ALFA-0701): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study , 2012, The Lancet.

[8]  E. Vellenga,et al.  Autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia. , 2011, Blood.

[9]  Augustin Ferrant,et al.  Cytarabine dose for acute myeloid leukemia. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  R. Hills,et al.  Identification of patients with acute myeloblastic leukemia who benefit from the addition of gemtuzumab ozogamicin: results of the MRC AML15 trial. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  Bob Löwenberg,et al.  Review Articles (434 articles) , 2008 .

[12]  A. Hagemeijer,et al.  Monosomal karyotype in acute myeloid leukemia: a better indicator of poor prognosis than a complex karyotype. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[13]  E. Estey,et al.  Results of a phase 1-2 study of clofarabine in combination with cytarabine (ara-C) in relapsed and refractory acute leukemias. , 2005, Blood.

[14]  C. Bloomfield,et al.  Revised recommendations of the International Working Group for Diagnosis, Standardization of Response Criteria, Treatment Outcomes, and Reporting Standards for Therapeutic Trials in Acute Myeloid Leukemia. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[15]  H. Kantarjian,et al.  Phase 2 clinical and pharmacologic study of clofarabine in patients with refractory or relapsed acute leukemia. , 2003, Blood.

[16]  Augustin Ferrant,et al.  Effect of priming with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on the outcome of chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  T Hamblin,et al.  International scoring system for evaluating prognosis in myelodysplastic syndromes. , 1997, Blood.

[18]  Michael S Mathisen,et al.  Cytarabine dose for acute myeloid leukemia. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  R. Arceci Identification of Patients With Acute Myeloblastic Leukemia Who Benefit From the Addition of Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin: Results of the MRC AML15 Trial , 2011 .