Optimized release matrices for use in a BioMEMS device to study metastasis

Multiple changes within the tumor microenvironment have been correlated with an increase in metastasis, yet the mechanisms are not fully understood. Tumor cells can be stimulated by the release of chemoattractant factors such as epidermal growth factor (EGF) from nearby stromal cells, resulting in increased intravasation and metastasis. Additionally, altered extracellular matrix density can result in changes in gene expression patterns governing increased cellular proliferation and motility. The Nano Intravital Device (NANIVID) has been used to produce gradients of select soluble factors in the tumor microenvironment and to study the role of these changes on cell migration. In previous studies, the NANIVID utilized a synthetic hydrogel to produce an EGF gradient to attract metastatic breast cancer cells. In this work, a matrigel insert will be introduced into the outlet to provide a substrate for cells to migrate on when entering the device. The concentration of the chemoattractant and matrigel comprising the insert will be optimized to produce a suitable gradient for inducing chemotaxis in metastatic breast cancer cells in vitro. Additionally, silk and alginate matrices will be explored as improved soluble factor release mediums. Delivery of larger molecules such as collagen cross-linkers requires an alternative hydrogel material. Future NANIVID experiments will utilize these materials to gauge the cellular motility response when a stiffer matrix is encountered.

[1]  H. Kleinman,et al.  Matrigel: basement membrane matrix with biological activity. , 2005, Seminars in cancer biology.

[2]  Erik Sahai,et al.  Tumor cells caught in the act of invading: their strategy for enhanced cell motility. , 2005, Trends in cell biology.

[3]  J. Segall,et al.  The collection of the motile population of cells from a living tumor. , 2000, Cancer research.

[4]  Mikala Egeblad,et al.  Matrix Crosslinking Forces Tumor Progression by Enhancing Integrin Signaling , 2009, Cell.

[5]  N. Dubrawsky Cancer statistics , 1989, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[6]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer statistics, 2012 , 2012, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[7]  John S. Condeelis,et al.  Chemotaxis in cancer , 2011, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[8]  D. Hutmacher,et al.  Engineered silk fibroin protein 3D matrices for in vitro tumor model. , 2011, Biomaterials.

[9]  Patricia J. Keely,et al.  Use of three-dimensional collagen gels to study mechanotransduction in T47D breast epithelial cells , 2005, Biological Procedures Online.

[10]  Wee,et al.  Protein release from alginate matrices. , 1998, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[11]  P. G. Wells,et al.  Progression and metastasis in a transgenic mouse breast cancer model: effects of exposure to in vivo hypoxia. , 2009, Cancer letters.

[12]  James Castracane,et al.  A new chemotaxis device for cell migration studies. , 2010, Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro.

[13]  H. Kagan,et al.  Lysyl oxidase: Properties, specificity, and biological roles inside and outside of the cell , 2003, Journal of cellular biochemistry.

[14]  James Castracane,et al.  Development path and current status of the NANIVID: a new device for cancer cell studies. , 2012, Journal of micro/nanolithography, MEMS, and MOEMS : JM3.

[15]  David L Kaplan,et al.  Mechanisms of controlled release from silk fibroin films. , 2011, Biomacromolecules.

[16]  I. Macdonald,et al.  Metastasis: Dissemination and growth of cancer cells in metastatic sites , 2002, Nature Reviews Cancer.