Developing a robust integrated learning system for the modern battlefield

This paper outlines our long-term vision for integrating robust machine learning as an approach to the modern battlefield. We will develop the architecture for an Integrated Learning System (ILS) that will enable representation tools to maximize the utility of data collected by distributed sensors. This project will suggest a system for data capture, processing, retrieval and analysis and focus on the development of semantic interoperability for ontology alignment and the ability to learn from experiences, so that performance improves as it accumulates knowledge resulting in the ability to learn new object/event classes and improve its classification accuracy. To illustrate the notion of robust learning from distinct representations of sensor data from a common source, we offer an application where a LCS addresses automatic target recognition (ATR) in extended operating conditions (EOCs). The LCS-based robust ATR system performed well, resulting in powerful ATR rules that generalize over multiple feature types, with accuracy over 99% and robustness over 80%. To illustrate the notion of ontology enabling learning, we outline preliminary experiments with a network of LCSs integrating ATR via a simple vehicle ontology.

[1]  Kenneth A. De Jong,et al.  Using genetic algorithms for concept learning , 1993, Machine Learning.

[2]  John H. Holmes Applying a Learning Classifier System to Mining Explanatory and Predictive Models from a Large Clinical Database , 2000, IWLCS.

[3]  Avinash Gandhe,et al.  Robust automatic target recognition using learning classifier systems , 2007, Inf. Fusion.

[4]  Stewart W. Wilson Mining Oblique Data with XCS , 2000, IWLCS.

[5]  Joseph R. Diemunsch,et al.  MSTAR's extensible search engine and model-based inferencing toolkit , 1999, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[6]  Timothy D. Ross,et al.  Evaluation of SAR ATR algorithm performance sensitivity to MSTAR extended operating conditions , 1998, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[7]  Stewart W. Wilson,et al.  Learning Classifier Systems, From Foundations to Applications , 2000 .

[8]  Tim Kovacs,et al.  Advances in Learning Classifier Systems , 2001, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[9]  Sean Saxon,et al.  XCS and the Monk's Problems , 1999, Learning Classifier Systems.

[10]  John H. Holland,et al.  Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence , 1992 .

[11]  Ronald P. S. Mahler,et al.  Robust SAR ATR via set-valued classifiers: new results , 2003, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[12]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning , 1988 .

[13]  Avinash Gandhe,et al.  XCS for robust automatic target recognition , 2005, GECCO '05.

[14]  Eric R. Keydel,et al.  MSTAR extended operating conditions: a tutorial , 1996, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[15]  David G. Stork,et al.  Pattern classification, 2nd Edition , 2000 .

[16]  Keinosuke Fukunaga,et al.  Introduction to Statistical Pattern Recognition , 1972 .

[17]  Joydeep Ghosh,et al.  Structurally adaptive modular networks for nonstationary environments , 1999, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.