The development of English modal from main verb in Old English to auxiliary in early Modern English, has been analysed on the one hand as a categorial reanalysis from V to Aux, on the other as a grammaticalization process. It is clear that the historical changes affecting the modal verbs take place very gradually, which would seem on the surface to argue for a grammaticalization approach. However, it is unclear what the grammatical correlates are for the various stages in this grammaticalization process. It will be argued that the graduality of the changes is to some extent illusory; modals in Old English are lexical verbs that select a propositional VP complement, as opposed to IP or CP with other verbs. A number of syntactic changes, themselves reanalyses, conspired to induce a categorial reanalysis from V to Aux. Thus we will see that the gradual process can be viewed as a series of discrete and independently motivated steps.
[1]
H. V. Riemsdijk,et al.
Verb Projection Raising, Scope, and the Typology of Rules Affecting Verbs
,
1986
.
[2]
J. Koster.
On binding and control
,
1984
.
[3]
Frans Plank.
The Modals Story Retold
,
1984
.
[4]
Ian G. Roberts,et al.
Agreement parameters and the development of English modal auxiliaries
,
1985
.
[5]
Anthony Warner,et al.
Principles of diachronic syntax
,
1983,
Journal of Linguistics.
[6]
Dominique Sportiche.
A theory of floating quantifiers and its corollaries for constituent structure
,
1988
.
[7]
Halldor Armann Sigurðsson,et al.
Icelandic Case-marked PRO and the licensing of lexical arguments
,
1991
.