Effects of sex, age, and forced attention on dichotic listening in children: A longitudinal study

Seventy‐six children (38 boys, 38 girls) were tested with dichotic presentations of consonant‐vowel (CV) syllables under three different attentional instructions. Each child was tested twice: at age 8 and 1 year later (at age 9). The study investigated effects of laterally biased attention in dichotic performance in children. In the nonforced (NF) recall condition, children were free to report from both ears; in the forced‐right (FR) condition, they were instructed to attend to and report from only the right ear; in the forced‐left (FL) condition, they were instructed to attend to and report from only the left ear. The results showed a significant right‐ear advantage in both boys and girls and at both test occasions for the NF and FR conditions. During the FL condition, boys still reported more items from the right ear at age 8 but no at age 9, whereas girls reported an equal number of items from both ears at both test occasions. Thus, although hemisphere asymmetry did not change across age, the ability t...

[1]  D. Kimura Cerebral dominance and the perception of verbal stimuli. , 1961 .

[2]  D. Kimura,et al.  SPEECH LATERALIZATION IN YOUNG CHILDREN AS DETERMINED BY AN AUDITORY TEST. , 1963, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[3]  M. Studdert-Kennedy,et al.  Identification of Consonants and Vowels Presented to Left and Right Ears* , 1967, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[4]  Frederic K. W. Curry,et al.  The performance of stutterers on dichotic listening tasks thought to reflect cerebral dominance. , 1969, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[5]  R. Kirk Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences , 1970 .

[6]  M. Studdert-Kennedy,et al.  Hemispheric specialization for speech perception. , 1970, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  C. Berlin,et al.  Dichotic right ear advantage in children 5 to 13. , 1973, Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior.

[8]  M. McNeil,et al.  Listener reliability for a dichotic task , 1974 .

[9]  W. McKeever,et al.  Dyslexic Adolescents: Evidence of Impaired Visual and Auditory Language Processing Associated with Normal Lateralization and Visual Responsivity , 1975, Cortex.

[10]  B H Repp,et al.  Measuring laterality effects in dichotic listening. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  G. Geffen,et al.  Development of Selective Listening and Hemispheric Asymmetry. , 1979 .

[12]  J. Mcglone,et al.  Sex differences in human brain asymmetry: a critical survey , 1980, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[13]  Gina Geffen,et al.  Reliability and validity of the dichotic monitoring test for language laterality , 1981, Neuropsychologia.

[14]  K. Munhall,et al.  Attentional biases and the right-ear effect in dichotic listening , 1983, Brain and Language.

[15]  Hemispheric specialization and ear advantages in processing speech. , 1984 .

[16]  K. Hugdahl,et al.  A Dichotic Listening Study of Differences in Cerebral Organization in Dextral and Sinistral Subjects , 1984, Cortex.

[17]  M. Bryden,et al.  Information processing and speech lateralization in learning-disabled children , 1985, Brain and Language.

[18]  Janice E Murray,et al.  Toward a model of dichotic listening performance , 1985, Brain and Cognition.

[19]  K. Hugdahl,et al.  The “Forced-Attention Paradigm” in Dichotic Listening to CV-Syllables: A Comparison Between Adults and Children , 1986, Cortex.

[20]  J. Bradshaw,et al.  Dichotic and dichhaptic techniques , 1986, Neuropsychologia.

[21]  K. Hugdahl Lateralization of Associative Processes: Human Conditioning Studies , 1987 .

[22]  K. Hugdahl,et al.  Dichotic listening and reading acquisition in children: a one-year follow-up. , 1987, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.