Nucleotypic effects without nuclei: genome size and erythrocyte size in mammals.

Previously reported haploid genome sizes (C-values) and erythrocyte sizes (measured as mean dry diameters) were compared for 67 species of mammals representing 31 families and 16 orders. Measurements on erythrocytes of four species of bats were also included in the study. Erythrocyte size was significantly positively correlated with genome size at each of the specific, generic, familial, and ordinal levels, with the relationship becoming much stronger following the exclusion of the order Artiodactyla, a group unique among mammals in terms of red blood cell morphology. Physiologically, these results are relevant in light of the known relationship between C-value and mass-corrected metabolic rate in homeotherms. In evolutionary terms, they provide insights into the constraints on genome expansion among mammals and are therefore of interest in attempts to solve the long-standing C-value enigma (also known as the C-value paradox).

[1]  A. Hughes,et al.  Small genomes for better flyers , 1995, Nature.

[2]  Á. Spotorno,et al.  Genome size variation and its phenotypic consequences in Phyllotis rodents. , 1991, Hereditas.

[3]  P. Board,et al.  Red blood cells of domestic mammals , 1983 .

[4]  H. Kato,et al.  ABSENCE OF CORRELATION BETWEEN DNA REPAIR IN ULTRAVIOLET IRRADIATED MAMMALIAN CELLS AND LIFE SPAN OF THE DONOR SPECIES , 1980 .

[5]  S. Ohno,et al.  So much "junk" DNA in our genome. , 1972, Brookhaven symposia in biology.

[6]  A. Mirsky,et al.  THE DESOXYRIBONUCLEIC ACID CONTENT OF ANIMAL CELLS AND ITS EVOLUTIONARY SIGNIFICANCE , 1951, The Journal of general physiology.

[7]  M. Pagès,et al.  Evidence for the smallest nuclear genome (2.9 Mb) in the microsporidium Encephalitozoon cuniculi. , 1995, Molecular and biochemical parasitology.

[8]  W. D. Jackson,et al.  DNA Content of Monotremes , 1967, Nature.

[9]  Wolfgang Stephan,et al.  The evolutionary dynamics of repetitive DNA in eukaryotes , 1994, Nature.

[10]  M. Bennett,et al.  The duration of meiosis , 1971, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[11]  E. Olmo Nucleotype and cell size in vertebrates: a review. , 1983, Basic and applied histochemistry.

[12]  P. Withers,et al.  Comparative Animal Physiology , 1992 .

[13]  R. Gregory,et al.  The modulation of DNA content: proximate causes and ultimate consequences. , 1999, Genome research.

[14]  JOSEPH M. Hill,et al.  Hemolysis and Related Phenomena , 1949 .

[15]  A. Vinogradov NUCLEOTYPIC EFFECT IN HOMEOTHERMS: BODY‐MASS INDEPENDENT RESTING METABOLIC RATE OF PASSERINE BIRDS IS RELATED TO GENOME SIZE , 1997, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[16]  F. Crick,et al.  Selfish DNA: the ultimate parasite , 1980, Nature.

[17]  C. A. Thomas The genetic organization of chromosomes. , 1971, Annual review of genetics.

[18]  D. Hayman,et al.  Errata for the paper "Quantitative comparisons between the karyotepes of Australian marsupials from three different superfamilies", Chromosoma Vol. 20, pp. 290-310 (1967). , 1967, Chromosoma.

[19]  A. Vinogradov Genome size and GC-percent in vertebrates as determined by flow cytometry: the triangular relationship. , 1998, Cytometry.

[20]  R. Moyzis,et al.  Fragile sites, telomeric DNA sequences, B chromosomes, and DNA content in raccoon dogs, Nyctereutes procyonoides, with comparative notes on foxes, coyote, wolf, and raccoon. , 1988, Cytogenetics and cell genetics.

[21]  W. Doolittle,et al.  Selfish genes, the phenotype paradigm and genome evolution , 1980, Nature.

[22]  C. Pond,et al.  Walker's Mammals of the World, 4th Edition, Ronald M. Nowak, John L. Paradiso. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland (1983), 1xi, +1-568 (Vol. I), xxv+569-1362 (Vol. II). Price $65.00 , 1984 .

[23]  A. Vinogradov NUCLEOTYPIC EFFECT IN HOMEOTHERMS: BODY‐MASS‐CORRECTED BASAL METABOLIC RATE OF MAMMALS IS RELATED TO GENOME SIZE , 1995, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[24]  D. Labie,et al.  Molecular Evolution , 1991, Nature.

[25]  B. Commoner,et al.  Roles Of Deoxyribonucleic Acid in Inheritance , 1964, Nature.

[26]  T. Cavalier-smith The Evolution of genome size , 1985 .

[27]  H. Szarski,et al.  Cell size and the concept of wasteful and frugal evolutionary strategies. , 1983, Journal of theoretical biology.

[28]  J. Bickham,et al.  FLOW‐CYTOMETRIC ANALYSES OF NUCLEAR DNA CONTENT IN FOUR FAMILIES OF NEOTROPICAL BATS , 1989, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[29]  E S Lander,et al.  Ploidy regulation of gene expression. , 1999, Science.

[30]  S. Garagna,et al.  DNA content variability in several species of Australian and South American marsupials , 1981 .

[31]  P. G. Martin Variation in the amounts of nucleic acids in the cells of different species of higher plants. , 1966, Experimental cell research.

[32]  C. Pellicciari,et al.  DNA content variability in primates , 1982 .

[33]  T. Gregory,et al.  Coincidence, coevolution, or causation? DNA content, cellsize, and the C‐value enigma , 2001, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[34]  R. Ojeda,et al.  Discovery of tetraploidy in a mammal , 1999, Nature.

[35]  Daryl E. Wilson,et al.  Mammal Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference , 1993 .

[36]  J. Swanson,et al.  Cellular dimensions affecting the nucleocytoplasmic volume ratio , 1991, The Journal of cell biology.

[37]  T. Cavalier-smith,et al.  Skeletal DNA and the evolution of genome size. , 1982, Annual review of biophysics and bioengineering.

[38]  N. Marziliano,et al.  Genome composition in Venezuelan spiny-rats of the genus Proechimys(Rodentia, Echimyidae). I. Genome size, C-heterochromatin and repetitive DNAs in situ hybridization patterns. , 1997, Cytogenetics and cell genetics.

[39]  P. Hieter,et al.  Polyploidy--More Is More or Less , 1999, Science.

[40]  R. Baker,et al.  Reduced Number of Ribosomal Sites in Bats: Evidence for a Mechanism to Contain Genome Size , 1992 .