Residual stress driven creep cracking in AISI Type 316 stainless steel

Specially designed AISI Type 316H austenitic stainless steel 25 mm thick compact tension specimens have been plastically deformed to produce significant tensile hydrostatic residual stresses at the notch root at mid-thickness. These specimens were thermally exposed at 550 °C for 4500 hours in order to study elevated temperature creep relaxation of residual stress and the development of reheat cracking creep damage. Residual strains within the specimens were measured using diffraction techniques before and after thermal exposure. A three-dimensional finite element model was developed both to predict the residual stress within the specimens before and after thermal exposure. No reheat cracking was found near surface, but due to the reduced creep ductility with increasing hydrostatic stress, significant creep cavitation was found mid-thickness. A previously developed creep damage model was applied to predict the onset of reheat cracking. Good correlation has been found between measurements and finite element predictions of strain and stress before and after thermal exposure. The extent of creep damage has also been assessed through destructive examination, providing validation for the creep damage prediction model.

[1]  John R. Tyrer,et al.  Recent developments and applications in electronic speckle pattern interferometry , 1998 .

[2]  D. Holm,et al.  Growth of cracks under far-field cyclic compressive loads: numerical and experimental results , 1986 .

[3]  R. P. Skelton,et al.  Factors affecting reheat cracking in the HAZ of austenitic steel weldments , 2003 .

[4]  R. Hales A METHOD OF CREEP DAMAGE SUMMATION BASED ON ACCUMULATED STRAIN FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF CREEP‐FATIGUE ENDURANCE , 1983 .

[5]  P. Withers,et al.  Quantification of creep cavitation damage around a crack in a stainless steel pressure vessel , 2004 .

[6]  M. Loveday,et al.  Grain boundary cavitation under various states of applied stress , 1976, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[7]  M. W. Spindler,et al.  The multiaxial creep ductility of austenitic stainless steels , 2004 .

[8]  P. Withers,et al.  Full‐field strain mapping by optical correlation of micrographs acquired during deformation , 2005, Journal of microscopy.

[9]  Subra Suresh,et al.  Constitutive behavior of a microcracking brittle solid in cyclic compression , 1987 .

[10]  C. Tomé,et al.  Measured and predicted intergranular strains in textured austenitic steel , 2000 .

[11]  Philip J. Withers,et al.  Residual Stress Driven Creep Cracking in Type 316 Stainless Steel , 2004 .

[12]  P. Withers,et al.  The development of a compact specimen to study the influence of residual stresses on fracture , 2002 .

[13]  K. R. Williams,et al.  On the distribution of cavities during creep , 1968 .

[14]  Philip J. Withers,et al.  High-resolution strain mapping in bulk samples using full-profile analysis of energy dispersive synchrotron X-ray diffraction data , 2005 .

[15]  P. J. Bouchard,et al.  Three dimensional multi-pass repair weld simulations , 2005 .