Perception is a two-way junction: Feedback semantics in word recognition

Feedback semantics refers to whether a specific meaning can be represented by only one word (consistent) or by several words (inconsistent)—that is, whether a word has synonyms (e.g.,jail) or not (e.g.,milk). Models of word perception that allow feedback activation from semantics to orthography and phonology predict that performance should be worse for words that are feedback inconsistent (words with a synonym) than for words that are feedback consistent (words without a synonym). The present study showed that both naming and lexical decision responses are faster and more accurate to consistent than to inconsistent words. The results provide support for models that allow feedback activation between phonology, orthography, and semantics.

[1]  G. Stone,et al.  Perception Is a Two-Way Street: Feedforward and Feedback Phonology in Visual Word Recognition ☆ , 1997 .

[2]  Timothy P. McNamara,et al.  Theories of priming: I. Associative distance and lag. , 1992 .

[3]  R. Schvaneveldt,et al.  Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.

[4]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Semantic effects in single-word naming. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[5]  Arthur M. Jacobs,et al.  What is the pronunciation for -ough and the spelling for /u/? A database for computing feedforward and feedback consistency in English , 1997 .

[6]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Conspiracy effects in word pronunciation. , 1987 .

[7]  J. Ziegler,et al.  The Feedback Consistency Effect in Lexical Decision and Naming , 1997 .

[8]  R. Peereman,et al.  Is perception a two-way street ?: The case of feedback consistency in visual word recognition , 1998 .

[9]  Curt Burgess,et al.  The effect of corpus size in predicting reaction time in a basic word recognition task: Moving on from Kučera and Francis , 1998 .

[10]  Derek Besner,et al.  When banking on meaning is not (yet) money in the bank: Explorations in connectionist modeling. , 1994 .

[11]  J. Jastrzembski.  Multiple meanings, number of related meanings, frequency of occurrence, and the lexicon , 1981, Cognitive Psychology.

[12]  William T. Farrar,et al.  When SOFA primes TOUCH: Interdependence of spelling, sound, and meaning in “semantically mediated” phonological priming , 2001, Memory & cognition.

[13]  B. M.,et al.  Representational Aspects of Word Imageability and Word Frequency as Assessed Through Word Association , 2001 .

[14]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Pre- and postlexical loci of contextual effects on word recognition , 1984, Memory & cognition.

[15]  M. Masson.  A distributed memory model of semantic priming. , 1995 .

[16]  J. Ziegler,et al.  Orthography shapes the perception of speech: The consistency effect in auditory word recognition , 1998 .

[17]  H. H. Clark.  The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research. , 1973 .

[18]  Tamiko Azuma,et al.  Why SAFE Is Better Than FAST: The Relatedness of a Word's Meanings Affects Lexical Decision Times , 1997 .

[19]  G. Stone,et al.  Strategic control of processing in word recognition. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  G. C. Orden,et al.  Interdependence of form and function in cognitive systems explains perception of printed words. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[21]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Understanding normal and impaired word reading: computational principles in quasi-regular domains. , 1996, Psychological review.

[22]  W. Whitten,et al.  Bidirectional synonym ratings of 464 noun pairs , 1979 .

[23]  J. E.,et al.  Semantic Ambiguity Effects in Word Identification , 1996 .

[24]  G Kellas,et al.  Lexical ambiguity and the timecourse of attentional allocation in word recognition. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  S. Lupker,et al.  Ambiguity and visual word recognition: can feedback explain both homophone and polysemy effects? , 1999, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[26]  S. Andrews.  Phonological recoding: Is the regularity effect consistent? , 1982 .

[27]  Max Coltheart,et al.  The MRC Psycholinguistic Database , 1981 .

[28]  R. Glushko.  The Organization and Activation of Orthographic Knowledge in Reading Aloud. , 1979 .

[29]  J. Wilding,et al.  Preferred synonyms for each noun of 279 synonym pairs , 1983 .

[30]  J. Raaijmakers,et al.  Does pizza prime coin? Perceptual priming in lexical decision and pronunciation. , 1998 .