Does the Fed act gradually? a VAR analysis

The tendency for changes in the federal funds rate to be implemented gradually has been considered evidence of an interest rate smoothing objective for the Federal Reserve. This paper investigates whether gradual funds rate movements can be explained by the dynamic structure of the economy and the uncertainty that the Fed faces regarding this structure. Using the estimated structural form from a VAR, the analysis first computes the funds rate that is expected in the presence of additive uncertainty. The expected policy can explain persistent directional movements in the funds rate but reacts too aggressively to changes in the non-policy variables. The observed policy instead dampens interest rate changes and moves gradually towards the expected policy. The analysis is then extended to incorporate parameter uncertainty arising from imprecise estimation of the VAR coefficients. Parameter uncertainty biases the funds rate towards the level predicted by the policy rule that the Fed has historically followed. Because the Fed has traditionally smoothed interest rates, the expected policy under parameter uncertainty can account for a considerable portion of the gradual funds rate movements observed.

[1]  Jeffrey C. Fuhrer.  Inflation/Output Variance Trade-Offs and Optimal Monetary Policy , 1997 .

[2]  William C. Brainard.  Uncertainty and the effectiveness of policy , 1967 .

[3]  Glenn D. Rudebusch.  Federal Reserve interest rate targeting, rational expectations, and the term structure , 1995 .

[4]  John B. Taylor.  Monetary Policy Rules , 1999 .

[5]  B. Mccallum,et al.  An Optimizing Is-Lm Specification for Monetary Policy and Business Cycle Analysis , 1997 .

[6]  Stephen G. Cecchetti.  Inflation Indicators and Inflation Policy , 1995, NBER Macroeconomics Annual.

[7]  Andrew T. Levin,et al.  Robustness of Simple Policy Rules under Model Uncertainty , 1998 .

[8]  J. Galí,et al.  Monetary Policy Rules and Macroeconomic Stability: Evidence and Some Theory , 1998 .

[9]  Julio J. Rotemberg,et al.  An Optimization-Based Econometric Framework for the Evaluation of Monetary Policy , 1997, NBER Macroeconomics Annual.

[10]  Jeffrey C. Fuhrer,et al.  Monetary Policy Trade-offs and the Correlation between Nominal Interest Rates and Real Output , 1995 .

[11]  A. Cukierman.  Why Does the Fed Smooth Interest Rates , 1991 .

[12]  Frederic S. Mishkin,et al.  Rethinking the Role of NAIRU in Monetary Policy: Implications of Model Formulation and Uncertainty , 2000 .

[13]  B. Bernanke,et al.  The Federal Funds Rate and the Channels of Monetary Transnission , 1990 .

[14]  Michael Woodford,et al.  Interest-Rate Rules in an Estimated Sticky Price Model , 1998 .

[15]  C. Sims.  MACROECONOMICS AND REALITY , 1977 .

[16]  Lars E. O. Svensson.  Inflation Targeting: Some Extensions , 1997 .

[17]  John B. Taylor.  Discretion versus policy rules in practice , 1993 .

[18]  B. Bernanke,et al.  Measuring Monetary Policy , 1995 .

[19]  M. Goodfriend.  Interest Rate Smoothing and Price Level Trend-Stationarity , 1986 .

[20]  C. Sims.  Are forecasting models usable for policy analysis , 1986 .

[21]  Volker Wieland,et al.  Learning by doing and the value of optimal experimentation , 2000 .

[22]  T. Mills,et al.  Interest Rates and the Conduct of Monetary Policy , 1988 .

[23]  B. Sack.  Uncertainty, Learning, and Gradual Monetary Policy , 1998 .

[24]  R. Lucas.  Econometric policy evaluation: A critique , 1976 .

[25]  M. Woodford.  Optimal Monetary Policy Inertia , 1999 .