Rational optimization of tumor epitopes using in silico analysis‐assisted substitution of TCR contact residues

Altered peptide ligands with increased affinity of the peptide–MHC complex for the TCR provide an alternative strategy to natural T‐cell epitopes for cancer immunotherapy, as they can recruit and stimulate stronger T‐cell repertoires. However, it remains unclear how alterations of the TCR contact residues improve the interaction between the peptide–MHC complex and the TCR molecule. In this study, we introduced a molecular simulation strategy to optimize a tumor immunodominant epitope NY–ESO‐1157–165 by the substitution of the potential TCR contact residues. We correlated molecule simulation with T‐cell activation capacity assay and detected the effect of modifications of TCR contact residues on T‐cell recognition. An agonist peptide W5F with substitution at Trp5 with Phe was identified and it exhibits a stronger ability to induce a cross‐reactive CTL response with the WT peptide. Additionally, the W5F‐induced CTL could be maintained with the WT peptide and possess higher capacity in lysing native NY–ESO‐1‐expressing tumor cells. These results provide important insights into the enhanced immunogenicity of epitopes through substitution at the TCR contact sites and revealed a novel molecular simulation approach for rational therapeutic peptide vaccine design.

[1]  Luhua Lai,et al.  A combinatorial score to distinguish biological and nonbiological protein–protein interfaces , 2006, Proteins.

[2]  Partho Ghosh,et al.  Structure of the complex between human T-cell receptor, viral peptide and HLA-A2 , 1996, Nature.

[3]  K. Parker,et al.  HLA-A1 and HLA-A3 T cell epitopes derived from influenza virus proteins predicted from peptide binding motifs. , 1993, Journal of immunology.

[4]  Wei Zhou,et al.  H-2 Kd-Restricted Hepatitis B Virus-Derived Epitope Whose Specific CD8+ T Lymphocytes Can Produce Gamma Interferon without Cytotoxicity , 2005, Journal of Virology.

[5]  B M Baker,et al.  Four A6-TCR/peptide/HLA-A2 structures that generate very different T cell signals are nearly identical. , 1999, Immunity.

[6]  L. Edelstein-Keshet,et al.  Prevention of diabetes by manipulation of anti-IGRP autoimmunity: high efficiency of a low-affinity peptide , 2005, Nature Medicine.

[7]  Andrew Sewell,et al.  Structural and kinetic basis for heightened immunogenicity of T cell vaccines , 2005, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[8]  V. Cerundolo,et al.  Identification of NY-ESO-1 Peptide Analogues Capable of Improved Stimulation of Tumor-Reactive CTL1 , 2000, The Journal of Immunology.

[9]  K. Garcia,et al.  A functional hot spot for antigen recognition in a superagonist TCR/MHC complex. , 2000, Immunity.

[10]  S. Perez,et al.  Vaccination with human HER-2/neu (435-443) CTL peptide induces effective antitumor immunity against HER-2/neu-expressing tumor cells in vivo. , 2006, Cancer research.

[11]  T. Beddoe,et al.  Functional and Structural Characteristics of NY-ESO-1-related HLA A2-restricted Epitopes and the Design of a Novel Immunogenic Analogue* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[12]  D. Speiser,et al.  Ex vivo detectable human CD8 T-cell responses to cancer-testis antigens. , 2006, Cancer research.

[13]  H. Grey,et al.  Termination of peripheral tolerance to a T cell epitope by heteroclitic antigen analogues. , 1998, Journal of immunology.

[14]  D. Valmori,et al.  Distinct Structural TCR Repertoires in Naturally Occurring Versus Vaccine-Induced CD8+ T-Cell Responses to the Tumor-Specific Antigen NY-ESO-1 , 2005, Journal of immunotherapy.

[15]  J. Sacchettini,et al.  A Structural Difference Limited to One Residue of the Antigenic Peptide Can Profoundly Alter the Biological Outcome of the TCR-Peptide/MHC Class I Interaction1 , 2001, The Journal of Immunology.

[16]  F. Lemonnier,et al.  A general strategy to enhance immunogenicity of low‐affinity HLA‐A2.1‐associated peptides: implication in the identification of cryptic tumor epitopes , 2000, European journal of immunology.

[17]  J. Sidney,et al.  Improved Immunogenicity of an Immunodominant Epitope of the Her-2/neu Protooncogene by Alterations of MHC Contact Residues1 , 2004, The Journal of Immunology.

[18]  David E. Kim,et al.  Computational Alanine Scanning of Protein-Protein Interfaces , 2004, Science's STKE.

[19]  E. Jaffee,et al.  Enhanced antigen-specific antitumor immunity with altered peptide ligands that stabilize the MHC-peptide-TCR complex. , 2000, Immunity.

[20]  Darren R Flower,et al.  Coupling In Silico and In Vitro Analysis of Peptide-MHC Binding: A Bioinformatic Approach Enabling Prediction of Superbinding Peptides and Anchorless Epitopes , 2004, The Journal of Immunology.

[21]  H. Grey,et al.  The Stimulation of Low-Affinity, Nontolerized Clones by Heteroclitic Antigen Analogues Causes the Breaking of Tolerance Established to an Immunodominant T Cell Epitope , 1999, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[22]  Fenglou Mao,et al.  Potential of mean force for protein–protein interaction studies , 2002, Proteins.

[23]  B. Kavanagh,et al.  Distinct CD8+ T Cell Repertoires Primed with Agonist and Native Peptides Derived from a Tumor-Associated Antigen1 , 2008, The Journal of Immunology.

[24]  John Sidney,et al.  Structural Features of Peptide Analogs of Human Histocompatibility Leukocyte Antigen Class I Epitopes That Are More Potent and Immunogenic than Wild-Type Peptide , 2001, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[25]  B. Ni,et al.  An altered peptide ligand for naïve cytotoxic T lymphocyte epitope of TRP-2(180–188) enhanced immunogenicity , 2006, Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy.

[26]  J. Cormier,et al.  Immunization against epitopes in the human melanoma antigen gp100 following patient immunization with synthetic peptides. , 1996, Cancer research.

[27]  Tak H. Lee,et al.  Cytokine Coexpression During Human Th1/Th2 Cell Differentiation: Direct Evidence for Coordinated Expression of Th2 Cytokines1 , 2002, The Journal of Immunology.

[28]  Z. Ruan,et al.  Identification of a new HLA-A*0201-restricted cytotoxic T lymphocyte epitope from CML28 , 2006, Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy.

[29]  S. Steinberg,et al.  Increased vaccine-specific T cell frequency after peptide-based vaccination correlates with increased susceptibility to in vitro stimulation but does not lead to tumor regression. , 1999, Journal of immunology.

[30]  D. Gilden,et al.  Rapid and efficient identification of epitopes/mimotopes from random peptide libraries. , 2006, Journal of immunological methods.

[31]  Peter V Coveney,et al.  Peptide recognition by the T cell receptor: comparison of binding free energies from thermodynamic integration, Poisson–Boltzmann and linear interaction energy approximations , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[32]  Shunzhou Wan,et al.  Large‐scale molecular dynamics simulations of HLA‐A*0201 complexed with a tumor‐specific antigenic peptide: Can the α3 and β2m domains be neglected? , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[33]  C. Pinilla,et al.  Identification of Cross-Reactive Peptides Using Combinatorial Libraries Circumvents Tolerance against Her-2/neu-Immunodominant Epitope1 , 2006, The Journal of Immunology.

[34]  Olivier Michielin,et al.  Binding free energy differences in a TCR-peptide-MHC complex induced by a peptide mutation: a simulation analysis. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[35]  Wenda Gao,et al.  Induction of specific human primary immune responses to a Semliki Forest virus–based tumor vaccine in a Trimera mouse model , 2005, Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy.

[36]  D. Baker,et al.  A simple physical model for binding energy hot spots in protein–protein complexes , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  Yao-Tseng Chen,et al.  A testicular antigen aberrantly expressed in human cancers detected by autologous antibody screening. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.