Multi-state Modeling of Biomolecules

Multi-state modeling of biomolecules refers to a series of techniques used to represent and compute the behavior of biological molecules or complexes that can adopt a large number of possible functional states. Biological signaling systems often rely on complexes of biological macromolecules that can undergo several functionally significant modifications that are mutually compatible. Thus, they can exist in a very large number of functionally different states. Modeling such multi-state systems poses two problems: the problem of how to describe and specify a multi-state system (the “specification problem”) and the problem of how to use a computer to simulate the progress of the system over time (the “computation problem”). To address the specification problem, modelers have in recent years moved away from explicit specification of all possible states and towards rule-based formalisms that allow for implicit model specification, including the κ-calculus [1], BioNetGen [2]–[5], the Allosteric Network Compiler [6], and others [7], [8]. To tackle the computation problem, they have turned to particle-based methods that have in many cases proved more computationally efficient than population-based methods based on ordinary differential equations, partial differential equations, or the Gillespie stochastic simulation algorithm [9], [10]. Given current computing technology, particle-based methods are sometimes the only possible option. Particle-based simulators fall into two further categories: nonspatial simulators, such as StochSim [11], DYNSTOC [12], RuleMonkey [9], [13], and the Network-Free Stochastic Simulator (NFSim) [14], and spatial simulators, including Meredys [15], SRSim [16], [17], and MCell [18]–[20]. Modelers can thus choose from a variety of tools, the best choice depending on the particular problem. Development of faster and more powerful methods is ongoing, promising the ability to simulate ever more complex signaling processes in the future.

[1]  Jörg Stelling,et al.  Modular, rule-based modeling for the design of eukaryotic synthetic gene circuits , 2013, BMC Systems Biology.

[2]  Matthew S. Creamer,et al.  Specification, annotation, visualization and simulation of a large rule-based model for ERBB receptor signaling , 2012, BMC Systems Biology.

[3]  Hiroaki Kitano,et al.  The systems biology markup language (SBML): a medium for representation and exchange of biochemical network models , 2003, Bioinform..

[4]  Angus C. Nairn,et al.  Structure of the Autoinhibited Kinase Domain of CaMKII and SAXS Analysis of the Holoenzyme , 2005, Cell.

[5]  James R Faeder,et al.  Efficient modeling, simulation and coarse-graining of biological complexity with NFsim , 2011, Nature Methods.

[6]  Vincent Danos,et al.  Internal coarse-graining of molecular systems , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  William S. Hlavacek,et al.  Rule-based modeling of biochemical networks , 2005, Complex..

[8]  Stuart Aitken,et al.  A rule-based kinetic model of RNA polymerase II C-terminal domain phosphorylation , 2013, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[9]  Dennis Bray,et al.  Binding and diffusion of CheR molecules within a cluster of membrane receptors. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[10]  Nicolas Le Novère,et al.  Particle-Based Stochastic Simulation in Systems Biology , 2006 .

[11]  M K Bennett,et al.  Purification and characterization of a calmodulin-dependent protein kinase that is highly concentrated in brain. , 1983, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[12]  Jin Yang,et al.  The efficiency of reactant site sampling in network-free simulation of rule-based models for biochemical systems , 2011, Physical biology.

[13]  R. Brent,et al.  Modelling cellular behaviour , 2001, Nature.

[14]  Mudita Singhal,et al.  COPASI - a COmplex PAthway SImulator , 2006, Bioinform..

[15]  Peter Dittrich,et al.  Rule-based modeling and simulations of the inner kinetochore structure. , 2013, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[16]  Bashar Ibrahim,et al.  Spatial Rule-Based Modeling: A Method and Its Application to the Human Mitotic Kinetochore , 2013, Cells.

[17]  Srinivas Devadas,et al.  Efficient stochastic simulation of reaction–diffusion processes via direct compilation , 2009, Bioinform..

[18]  Carlos F. Lopez,et al.  Programming biological models in Python using PySB , 2013, Molecular systems biology.

[19]  J. Changeux,et al.  ON THE NATURE OF ALLOSTERIC TRANSITIONS: A PLAUSIBLE MODEL. , 1965, Journal of molecular biology.

[20]  A. Mogilner,et al.  Cell Polarity: Quantitative Modeling as a Tool in Cell Biology , 2012, Science.

[21]  Corrado Priami,et al.  Stochastic pi-Calculus , 1995, Comput. J..

[22]  William S. Hlavacek,et al.  Innovations of the Rule-Based Modeling Approach , 2013 .

[23]  Peter Dittrich,et al.  Using the SRSim Software for Spatial and Rule-Based Modeling of Combinatorially Complex Biochemical Reaction Systems , 2010, Int. Conf. on Membrane Computing.

[24]  Adelinde M. Uhrmacher,et al.  Rule-based multi-level modeling of cell biological systems , 2011, BMC Systems Biology.

[25]  Josef Spacek,et al.  Extracellular sheets and tunnels modulate glutamate diffusion in hippocampal neuropil , 2013, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[26]  Scott B. Baden,et al.  Fast Monte Carlo Simulation Methods for Biological Reaction-Diffusion Systems in Solution and on Surfaces , 2008, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[27]  Steve Plimpton,et al.  Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics , 1993 .

[28]  William S. Hlavacek,et al.  Simulation of large-scale rule-based models , 2009, Bioinform..

[29]  James R Faeder,et al.  Rule-based modeling of biochemical systems with BioNetGen. , 2009, Methods in molecular biology.

[30]  F. Klauschen,et al.  Computational Modeling of Cellular Signaling Processes Embedded into Dynamic Spatial Contexts , 2012, Nature Methods.

[31]  Roger Brent,et al.  Automatic generation of cellular reaction networks with Moleculizer 1.0 , 2005, Nature Biotechnology.

[32]  Melanie I. Stefan,et al.  Structural Analysis and Stochastic Modelling Suggest a Mechanism for Calmodulin Trapping by CaMKII , 2012, PloS one.

[33]  Joachim Niehren,et al.  Biochemical Reaction Rules with Constraints , 2011, ESOP.

[34]  김삼묘,et al.  “Bioinformatics” 특집을 내면서 , 2000 .

[35]  Erik De Schutter,et al.  Monte Carlo Methods for Simulating Realistic Synaptic Microphysiology Using MCell , 2000 .

[36]  Srinivas Devadas,et al.  CD4 and CD8 binding to MHC molecules primarily acts to enhance Lck delivery , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  Cosimo Laneve,et al.  Formal molecular biology , 2004, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[38]  D. Bray Protein molecules as computational elements in living cells , 1995, Nature.

[39]  L M Loew,et al.  CaMKII activation and dynamics are independent of the holoenzyme structure: an infinite subunit holoenzyme approximation , 2012, Physical biology.

[40]  M. Beato,et al.  How to impose microscopic reversibility in complex reaction mechanisms. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[41]  J Yang,et al.  Rule-based modelling and simulation of biochemical systems with molecular finite automata. , 2010, IET systems biology.

[42]  Adelinde M. Uhrmacher,et al.  Plug'n Simulate , 2007, 40th Annual Simulation Symposium (ANSS'07).

[43]  Nicolas Le Novère,et al.  STOCHSIM: modelling of stochastic biomolecular processes , 2001, Bioinform..

[44]  Michael Hucka,et al.  A Correction to the Review Titled "Rules for Modeling Signal-Transduction Systems" by W. S. Hlavacek et al. , 2006, Science's STKE.

[45]  James R. Faeder,et al.  Exact Hybrid Particle/Population Simulation of Rule-Based Models of Biochemical Systems , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[46]  Gordon D. Plotkin,et al.  Multi-level modelling via stochastic multi-level multiset rewriting† , 2013, Mathematical Structures in Computer Science.

[47]  Thomas Hinze,et al.  Rule-based spatial modeling with diffusing, geometrically constrained molecules , 2010, BMC Bioinformatics.

[48]  D. Gillespie Exact Stochastic Simulation of Coupled Chemical Reactions , 1977 .

[49]  William S. Hlavacek,et al.  BioNetGen: software for rule-based modeling of signal transduction based on the interactions of molecular domains , 2004, Bioinform..

[50]  William S. Hlavacek,et al.  RuleMonkey: software for stochastic simulation of rule-based models , 2010, BMC Bioinformatics.

[51]  Tian Jin,et al.  Key Role of Local Regulation in Chemosensing Revealed by a New Molecular Interaction-Based Modeling Method , 2006, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[52]  Ernst Dieter Gilles,et al.  ProMoT: modular modeling for systems biology , 2009, Bioinform..

[53]  Vahid Shahrezaei,et al.  Scalable Rule-Based Modelling of Allosteric Proteins and Biochemical Networks , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[54]  Vincent Danos,et al.  Rule-Based Modelling of Cellular Signalling , 2007, CONCUR.

[55]  T. Bartol,et al.  Miniature endplate current rise times less than 100 microseconds from improved dual recordings can be modeled with passive acetylcholine diffusion from a synaptic vesicle. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[56]  Nicolas Le Novère,et al.  Meredys, a multi-compartment reaction-diffusion simulator using multistate realistic molecular complexes , 2010, BMC Systems Biology.

[57]  James R Faeder,et al.  The complexity of complexes in signal transduction , 2003, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[58]  James R Faeder,et al.  Kinetic Monte Carlo method for rule-based modeling of biochemical networks. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[59]  S. V. Aksenov,et al.  A spatially extended stochastic model of the bacterial chemotaxis signalling pathway. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[60]  A Finney,et al.  Systems biology markup language: Level 2 and beyond. , 2003, Biochemical Society transactions.

[61]  Erik De Schutter,et al.  Computational neuroscience : realistic modeling for experimentalists , 2000 .