Assessment of the seismic performance of a structure often requires conducting nonlinear dynamic analyses under a set of ground motion records scaled to a specific level of intensity. Recent researches have demonstrated that pseudo spectral acceleration at the first mode period of vibration, Sa(T1),which is commonly used as the seismic intensity scaling index, may introduce a large scatter in the estimated seismic demands under near-fault pulselike ground motions. Considering the need to provide more accurate estimation of seismic demands by using a smaller number of records, development of an improved scaling method that can reduce the variability in seismic demands becomes inevitable. In this paper, an improved intensity measure is developed based on the Root-Mean-Square (RMS) value of spectral responses, which is calculated over an appropriate period range. For this purpose, Incremental Dynamic Analyses (IDAs) are carried out for five generic frames of short to relatively long periods under 40 pulse-like earthquake records rotated to the faultnormal direction. Statistical study of the IDAs results is performed to determine the type of the response spectrum (i.e. pseudo acceleration, velocity or displacement) and the optimal period range for calculating the RMS value as the improved scaling method. Statistical evaluation reveals that the RMS of pseudo spectral accelerations,(Sa)rms, provides much superior results than RMS of spectral displacements, (Sd)rms, and RMS of spectral velocities, (Sv)rms. It is concluded that the optimal period range varies with the fundamental period of a structure, and that (Sa)rms, if calculated over the optimal period range, can predict the seismic demands with the overall dispersions that are generally reduced by the relative amount of 14 percent with respect to those of Sa(T1). The newly proposed parameter can also reduce the dispersion in predicted collapse capacities of the frames by the relative amount of 24 percent compared to Sa(T1) on average. A. Yahyaabadi, M. Tehranizadeh
[1]
Sashi K. Kunnath,et al.
Effects of Fling Step and Forward Directivity on Seismic Response of Buildings
,
2006
.
[2]
Robert W. Graves,et al.
Conditions that give rise to unusually large long period ground motions
,
1993
.
[3]
Dixiong Yang,et al.
Non‐structure‐specific intensity measure parameters and characteristic period of near‐fault ground motions
,
2009
.
[4]
P. Somerville.
CHARACTERIZING NEAR FAULT GROUND MOTION FOR THE DESIGN AND EVALUATION OF BRIDGES
,
2002
.
[5]
Luis Ibarra,et al.
Hysteretic models that incorporate strength and stiffness deterioration
,
2005
.
[6]
Eugenio Chioccarelli,et al.
Near‐source seismic demand and pulse‐like records: A discussion for L'Aquila earthquake
,
2010
.
[7]
Dimitrios Vamvatsikos,et al.
Incremental dynamic analysis
,
2002
.
[8]
Farzin Zareian,et al.
Impact of Near-Fault Pulses on Engineering Design
,
2005
.
[9]
Jack W. Baker,et al.
VECTOR-VALUED INTENSITY MEASURES FOR PULSE-LIKE NEAR-FAULT GROUND MOTIONS
,
2008
.
[10]
Nicolas Luco,et al.
Probabilistic seismic demand analysis using advanced ground motion intensity measures
,
2007
.
[11]
R. Medina,et al.
Seismic Demands for Nondeteriorating Frame Structures and Their Dependence on Ground Motions
,
2003
.
[12]
M. Tehranizadeh,et al.
NONLINEAR DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURES UNDER NEAR-FAULT GROUND MOTIONS USING AN IMPROVED SCALING METHOD
,
2010
.
[13]
J. Baker,et al.
A vector‐valued ground motion intensity measure consisting of spectral acceleration and epsilon
,
2005
.
[14]
J. Bray,et al.
Characterization of forward-directivity ground motions in the near-fault region
,
2004
.