Using Theory Formation Techniques for the Invention of Fictional Concepts

We introduce a novel method for the formation of fictional concepts based on the non-existence conjectures made by the HR automated theory formation system. We further introduce the notion of the typicality of an example with respect to a concept into HR, which leads to methods for ordering fictional concepts with respect to novelty, vagueness and stimulation. To test whether these measures are correlated with the way in which people similarly assess the value of fictional concepts, we ran an experiment to produce thousands of definitions of fictional animals. We then compared the software’s evaluations of the non-fictional concepts with those obtained through a survey consulting sixty people. The results show that two of the three measures have a correlation with human notions. We report on the experiment, and we compare our system with the well established method of conceptual blending, which leads to a discussion of automated ideation in future Computational Creativity projects.

[1]  Francisco C. Pereira,et al.  The horse-bird creature generation experiment , 2003 .

[2]  Stephen Muggleton,et al.  Mathematical applications of inductive logic programming , 2006, Machine Learning.

[3]  Graeme Ritchie,et al.  Some Empirical Criteria for Attributing Creativity to a Computer Program , 2007, Minds and Machines.

[4]  Toby Walsh,et al.  On the notion of interestingness in automated mathematical discovery , 2000, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[5]  Rob Saunders,et al.  Curious Design Agents and Artificial Creativity - A Synthetic Approach to the Study of Creative Behaviour , 2001 .

[6]  Alison Pease,et al.  A computational model of Lakatos-style reasoning , 2007 .

[7]  Terri Gullickson.  The Creative Mind: Myths and Mechanisms. , 1995 .

[8]  MSc PhD Simon Colton BSc.  Automated Theory Formation in Pure Mathematics , 2002, Distinguished Dissertations.

[9]  D. Berlyne.  Conflict, arousal, and curiosity , 2014 .

[10]  Simon Colton,et al.  Towards the automatic invention of simple mixed reality games , 2009 .

[11]  C.G. Pereira,et al.  Creativity and Artificial Intelligence: A Conceptual Blending Approach , 2007 .

[12]  Simon Colton,et al.  Automatic Invention of Fitness Functions with Application to Scene Generation , 2008, EvoWorkshops.

[13]  Paul Sambre,et al.  Gilles Fauconnier & Mark Turner, " The way we think: conceptual blending and the mind's hidden complexities" , 2002 .

[14]  Simon Colton.  Experiments in Meta-theory Formation , 2001 .

[15]  M. Boden.  The creative mind : myths & mechanisms , 1991 .

[16]  T. B. Ward.  Cognition, Creativity, and Entrepreneurship , 2004 .

[17]  S. Colton.  Automated Puzzle Generation , 2002 .

[18]  Abraham Silberschatz,et al.  What Makes Patterns Interesting in Knowledge Discovery Systems , 1996, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng..

[19]  G. Klir.  Where do we stand on measures of uncertainty, ambiguity, fuzziness, and the like? , 1987 .

[20]  G. Fauconnier,et al.  The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind''s Hidden Complexities. Basic Books , 2002 .