A prospective, randomised study comparing two techniques of autologous chondrocyte implantation for osteochondral defects in the knee: Periosteum covered versus type I/III collagen covered.

[1]  F R Noyes,et al.  A rationale for assessing sports activity levels and limitations in knee disorders. , 1989, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[2]  C. Ohlsson,et al.  Treatment of deep cartilage defects in the knee with autologous chondrocyte transplantation. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  C. Ohlsson,et al.  Rabbit Articular Cartilage Defects Treated With Autologous Cultured Chondrocytes , 1996, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[4]  Tom Minas,et al.  Current concepts in the treatment of articular cartilage defects. , 1997, Orthopedics.

[5]  A. G. Cobb,et al.  Treatment of painful articular cartilage defects of the patella by carbon-fibre implants , 1998 .

[6]  T. Minas.  The role of cartilage repair techniques, including chondrocyte transplantation, in focal chondral knee damage. , 1999, Instructional course lectures.

[7]  M. Brittberg,et al.  Two- to 9-Year Outcome After Autologous Chondrocyte Transplantation of the Knee , 2000, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[8]  Anders Lindahl,et al.  Autologous Chondrocyte Transplantation , 2002, The American journal of sports medicine.

[9]  T. Briggs,et al.  Histological evaluation of chondral defects after autologous chondrocyte implantation of the knee. , 2003, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[10]  G. Bentley,et al.  A prospective, randomised comparison of autologous chondrocyte implantation versus mosaicplasty for osteochondral defects in the knee. , 2003, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[11]  G. Bannister,et al.  American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons: Instructional Course Lectures: Edited by V. D. Pellegrini Pp. 650. Rosemont, Illinois: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 2005. ISBN: 0-89203-345-2. $112. , 2006 .