Qualified support for normative vs. non-normative protest: Less invested members of advantaged groups are most supportive when the protest fits the opportunity for status improvement

[1]  C. Leach,et al.  White Americans' belief in systemic racial injustice and in-group identification affect reactions to (peaceful vs. destructive) "Black Lives Matter" protest. , 2022, Psychology of Violence.

[2]  J. Becker,et al.  Applying the Dynamic Dual Pathway Model of Approach Coping to Collective Action Among Advantaged Group Allies and Disadvantaged Group Members , 2022, Frontiers in Psychology.

[3]  E. Halperin,et al.  Protest movements involving limited violence can sometimes be effective: Evidence from the 2020 BlackLivesMatter protests , 2022, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  C. Leach,et al.  Understanding Sentiment Toward “Black Lives Matter” , 2022, Social Issues and Policy Review.

[5]  R. Spears,et al.  Playing to the gallery: investigating the normative explanation of ingroup favoritism by testing the impact of imagined audience , 2021, Self and Identity.

[6]  Andrew G. Livingstone What Social Identities Can Tell Us about Violence in Social Movements, and Vice Versa , 2021 .

[7]  C. Leach,et al.  Some Psychological Implications of Black Struggle , 2021, Contention.

[8]  Linda R. Tropp,et al.  Witnessing racial discrimination shapes collective action for racial justice: Enhancing awareness of privilege among advantaged groups , 2020, Journal of Applied Social Psychology.

[9]  E. Halperin,et al.  Disrupting the system constructively: Testing the effectiveness of nonnormative nonviolent collective action. , 2020, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[10]  Stephen C. Wright,et al.  Beyond Allyship: Motivations for Advantaged Group Members to Engage in Action for Disadvantaged Groups , 2020, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[11]  R. Spears,et al.  Is Martin Luther King or Malcom X the more acceptable face of protest? High-status groups' reactions to low-status groups' collective action. , 2020, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  Anna Kende,et al.  A Needs-Based Support for #MeToo: Power and Morality Needs Shape Women’s and Men’s Support of the Campaign , 2020, Frontiers in Psychology.

[13]  John D. Oades,et al.  Do you get us? A multi-experiment, meta-analytic test of the effect of felt understanding in intergroup relations , 2019, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.

[14]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The unappreciated heterogeneity of effect sizes: Implications for power, precision, planning of research, and replication. , 2019, Psychological methods.

[15]  Cédric Batailler,et al.  New recommendations for testing indirect effects in mediational models: The need to report and test component paths. , 2018, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[16]  R. Kliegl,et al.  How to capitalize on a priori contrasts in linear (mixed) models: A tutorial , 2018, Journal of Memory and Language.

[17]  R. Spears,et al.  “I know you expect me to favor my ingroup”: Reviving Tajfel's original hypothesis on the generic norm explanation of ingroup favoritism , 2018 .

[18]  J. Savulescu,et al.  Rationing elective surgery for smokers and obese patients: responsibility or prognosis? , 2018, BMC medical ethics.

[19]  A. Manstead,et al.  Educationism and the irony of meritocracy: negative attitudes of higher educated people towards the less educated , 2017 .

[20]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Experiments with More Than One Random Factor: Designs, Analytic Models, and Statistical Power , 2017, Annual review of psychology.

[21]  Florian Wanders,et al.  The social dynamics of breaking the rules: antecedents and consequences of norm-violating behavior , 2015 .

[22]  R. Spears,et al.  By Any Means Necessary? When and Why Low Group Identification Paradoxically Predicts Radical Collective Action , 2015 .

[23]  Randi L. Garcia,et al.  The development of group influence on in-group identification: A multilevel approach , 2015 .

[24]  Nicole Tausch,et al.  A dynamic model of engagement in normative and non-normative collective action: Psychological antecedents, consequences, and barriers , 2015 .

[25]  Emma F. Thomas,et al.  When Will Collective Action Be Effective? Violent and Non-Violent Protests Differentially Influence Perceptions of Legitimacy and Efficacy Among Sympathizers , 2014, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[26]  Rupert Brown,et al.  Defend or repair? Explaining responses to in-group moral failure by disentangling feelings of shame, rejection, and inferiority. , 2012, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[27]  Russell Spears,et al.  Protesters as “Passionate Economists” , 2012, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[28]  Oliver Christ,et al.  Explaining radical group behavior: Developing emotion and efficacy routes to normative and nonnormative collective action. , 2011, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[29]  C. Leach,et al.  Group Devaluation and Group Identification , 2010 .

[30]  Michelle K. Ryan,et al.  Why Do Men and Women Challenge Gender Discrimination in the Workplace? The Role of Group Status and In‐group Identification in Predicting Pathways to Collective Action , 2009 .

[31]  Stephen C. Wright The Next Generation of Collective Action Research , 2009 .

[32]  S. Schmidt Shall we Really do it Again? The Powerful Concept of Replication is Neglected in the Social Sciences , 2009 .

[33]  Bertjan Doosje,et al.  How Perspective-Taking Helps and Hinders Group-Based Guilt as a Function of Group Identification , 2009 .

[34]  Bertjan Doosje,et al.  Group-level self-definition and self-investment: a hierarchical (multicomponent) model of in-group identification. , 2008, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[35]  T. Postmes,et al.  Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: a quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. , 2008, Psychological bulletin.

[36]  Edgar Erdfelder,et al.  G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[37]  Antony S R Manstead,et al.  Diversity in in-group bias: structural factors, situational features, and social functions. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[38]  Michelle K. Ryan,et al.  Who Cares? The Effect of Gender and Context on the Self and Moral Reasoning1 , 2004 .

[39]  C. Leach,et al.  White Guilt and Racial Compensation: The Benefits and Limits of Self-Focus , 2003, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[40]  Markus Brauer,et al.  The bystander effect and social control behavior: the effect of the presence of others on people's reactions to norm violations , 2002 .

[41]  Bertjan Doosje,et al.  Self and social identity. , 2002, Annual review of psychology.

[42]  A. Manstead,et al.  Guilty by Association: When One's Group Has a Negative History , 1998 .

[43]  Naomi Ellemers,et al.  PERCEIVED INTRAGROUP VARIABILITY AS A FUNCTION OF GROUP STATUS AND IDENTIFICATION , 1995 .

[44]  Vincent Yzerbyt,et al.  The black sheep effect: Judgmental extremity towards ingroup members in inter‐and intra‐group situations , 1988 .

[45]  Ak Thompson Violence, Social Movements, and Black Freedom Struggles , 2021 .

[46]  R. Spears,et al.  Predicting aggressive collective action based on the efficacy of peaceful and aggressive actions , 2016 .

[47]  A. Fiske,et al.  Moral psychology is relationship regulation: moral motives for unity, hierarchy, equality, and proportionality. , 2011, Psychological review.

[48]  C. Leach,et al.  "Poisoning the consciences of the fortunate": The experience of relative advantage and support for social equality , 2002 .

[49]  Donald M. Taylor,et al.  Responding to membership in a disadvantaged group : from acceptance to collective protest , 1990 .

[50]  H. Tajfel,et al.  An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. , 1979 .