Qualified support for normative vs. non-normative protest: Less invested members of advantaged groups are most supportive when the protest fits the opportunity for status improvement
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] C. Leach,et al. White Americans' belief in systemic racial injustice and in-group identification affect reactions to (peaceful vs. destructive) "Black Lives Matter" protest. , 2022, Psychology of Violence.
[2] J. Becker,et al. Applying the Dynamic Dual Pathway Model of Approach Coping to Collective Action Among Advantaged Group Allies and Disadvantaged Group Members , 2022, Frontiers in Psychology.
[3] E. Halperin,et al. Protest movements involving limited violence can sometimes be effective: Evidence from the 2020 BlackLivesMatter protests , 2022, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[4] C. Leach,et al. Understanding Sentiment Toward “Black Lives Matter” , 2022, Social Issues and Policy Review.
[5] R. Spears,et al. Playing to the gallery: investigating the normative explanation of ingroup favoritism by testing the impact of imagined audience , 2021, Self and Identity.
[6] Andrew G. Livingstone. What Social Identities Can Tell Us about Violence in Social Movements, and Vice Versa , 2021 .
[7] C. Leach,et al. Some Psychological Implications of Black Struggle , 2021, Contention.
[8] Linda R. Tropp,et al. Witnessing racial discrimination shapes collective action for racial justice: Enhancing awareness of privilege among advantaged groups , 2020, Journal of Applied Social Psychology.
[9] E. Halperin,et al. Disrupting the system constructively: Testing the effectiveness of nonnormative nonviolent collective action. , 2020, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[10] Stephen C. Wright,et al. Beyond Allyship: Motivations for Advantaged Group Members to Engage in Action for Disadvantaged Groups , 2020, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.
[11] R. Spears,et al. Is Martin Luther King or Malcom X the more acceptable face of protest? High-status groups' reactions to low-status groups' collective action. , 2020, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[12] Anna Kende,et al. A Needs-Based Support for #MeToo: Power and Morality Needs Shape Women’s and Men’s Support of the Campaign , 2020, Frontiers in Psychology.
[13] John D. Oades,et al. Do you get us? A multi-experiment, meta-analytic test of the effect of felt understanding in intergroup relations , 2019, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.
[14] D. A. Kenny,et al. The unappreciated heterogeneity of effect sizes: Implications for power, precision, planning of research, and replication. , 2019, Psychological methods.
[15] Cédric Batailler,et al. New recommendations for testing indirect effects in mediational models: The need to report and test component paths. , 2018, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[16] R. Kliegl,et al. How to capitalize on a priori contrasts in linear (mixed) models: A tutorial , 2018, Journal of Memory and Language.
[17] R. Spears,et al. “I know you expect me to favor my ingroup”: Reviving Tajfel's original hypothesis on the generic norm explanation of ingroup favoritism , 2018 .
[18] J. Savulescu,et al. Rationing elective surgery for smokers and obese patients: responsibility or prognosis? , 2018, BMC medical ethics.
[19] A. Manstead,et al. Educationism and the irony of meritocracy: negative attitudes of higher educated people towards the less educated , 2017 .
[20] D. A. Kenny,et al. Experiments with More Than One Random Factor: Designs, Analytic Models, and Statistical Power , 2017, Annual review of psychology.
[21] Florian Wanders,et al. The social dynamics of breaking the rules: antecedents and consequences of norm-violating behavior , 2015 .
[22] R. Spears,et al. By Any Means Necessary? When and Why Low Group Identification Paradoxically Predicts Radical Collective Action , 2015 .
[23] Randi L. Garcia,et al. The development of group influence on in-group identification: A multilevel approach , 2015 .
[24] Nicole Tausch,et al. A dynamic model of engagement in normative and non-normative collective action: Psychological antecedents, consequences, and barriers , 2015 .
[25] Emma F. Thomas,et al. When Will Collective Action Be Effective? Violent and Non-Violent Protests Differentially Influence Perceptions of Legitimacy and Efficacy Among Sympathizers , 2014, Personality & social psychology bulletin.
[26] Rupert Brown,et al. Defend or repair? Explaining responses to in-group moral failure by disentangling feelings of shame, rejection, and inferiority. , 2012, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[27] Russell Spears,et al. Protesters as “Passionate Economists” , 2012, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.
[28] Oliver Christ,et al. Explaining radical group behavior: Developing emotion and efficacy routes to normative and nonnormative collective action. , 2011, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[29] C. Leach,et al. Group Devaluation and Group Identification , 2010 .
[30] Michelle K. Ryan,et al. Why Do Men and Women Challenge Gender Discrimination in the Workplace? The Role of Group Status and In‐group Identification in Predicting Pathways to Collective Action , 2009 .
[31] Stephen C. Wright. The Next Generation of Collective Action Research , 2009 .
[32] S. Schmidt. Shall we Really do it Again? The Powerful Concept of Replication is Neglected in the Social Sciences , 2009 .
[33] Bertjan Doosje,et al. How Perspective-Taking Helps and Hinders Group-Based Guilt as a Function of Group Identification , 2009 .
[34] Bertjan Doosje,et al. Group-level self-definition and self-investment: a hierarchical (multicomponent) model of in-group identification. , 2008, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[35] T. Postmes,et al. Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: a quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. , 2008, Psychological bulletin.
[36] Edgar Erdfelder,et al. G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences , 2007, Behavior research methods.
[37] Antony S R Manstead,et al. Diversity in in-group bias: structural factors, situational features, and social functions. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[38] Michelle K. Ryan,et al. Who Cares? The Effect of Gender and Context on the Self and Moral Reasoning1 , 2004 .
[39] C. Leach,et al. White Guilt and Racial Compensation: The Benefits and Limits of Self-Focus , 2003, Personality & social psychology bulletin.
[40] Markus Brauer,et al. The bystander effect and social control behavior: the effect of the presence of others on people's reactions to norm violations , 2002 .
[41] Bertjan Doosje,et al. Self and social identity. , 2002, Annual review of psychology.
[42] A. Manstead,et al. Guilty by Association: When One's Group Has a Negative History , 1998 .
[43] Naomi Ellemers,et al. PERCEIVED INTRAGROUP VARIABILITY AS A FUNCTION OF GROUP STATUS AND IDENTIFICATION , 1995 .
[44] Vincent Yzerbyt,et al. The black sheep effect: Judgmental extremity towards ingroup members in inter‐and intra‐group situations , 1988 .
[45] Ak Thompson. Violence, Social Movements, and Black Freedom Struggles , 2021 .
[46] R. Spears,et al. Predicting aggressive collective action based on the efficacy of peaceful and aggressive actions , 2016 .
[47] A. Fiske,et al. Moral psychology is relationship regulation: moral motives for unity, hierarchy, equality, and proportionality. , 2011, Psychological review.
[48] C. Leach,et al. "Poisoning the consciences of the fortunate": The experience of relative advantage and support for social equality , 2002 .
[49] Donald M. Taylor,et al. Responding to membership in a disadvantaged group : from acceptance to collective protest , 1990 .
[50] H. Tajfel,et al. An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. , 1979 .