An Examination of the Actor-Observer Effect in Young Drivers' Attributions for Their Own and Their Friends' Risky Driving

The attributions of 70 young drivers for their own and their friends' risky driving were examined using open-ended questions to determine if there were self-other differences consistent with the actor-observer effect. Six response categories were created, 4 of which were rated as more dispositional than situational by a subsample of the participants and 2 of which were rated as more situational than dispositional. While the largely dispositional category "Showing off, acting cool" was used significantly more for friends than for self, and the largely situational "In a hurry, late" was used significantly more for self than for friends, there was only limited support for the actor-observer effect overall. The participants also rated their friends as taking more risks than themselves. The actor-observer differences are suggested to be influenced primarily by motivational factors and the context in which young people observe their friends' driving. New approaches to traffic safety interventions are suggested.

[1]  M. Cadinu,et al.  Self‐serving biases: The role of perspective‐taking , 1993 .

[2]  M L Matthews,et al.  Age differences in male drivers' perception of accident risk: the role of perceived driving ability. , 1986, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[3]  M. D. Storms,et al.  Videotape and the attribution process: reversing actors' and observers' points of view. , 1973, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[4]  R. Nisbett,et al.  Behavior as seen by the actor and as seen by the observer , 1973 .

[5]  Daniel Heradstveit,et al.  Attribution Theory and Arab Images of the Gulf War , 1996 .

[6]  P. Brickman,et al.  Causal chains: Attribution of responsibility as a function of immediate and prior causes. , 1975 .

[7]  D. Cremer.  Effect of group identification on the use of attributions , 2000 .

[8]  R J Donovan,et al.  Executing effective road safety advertising: are big production budgets necessary? , 1999, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[9]  Stephen G. Stradling,et al.  Attributional biases and driver behavior , 1990 .

[10]  Actor and Observer Attributions for Different Types of Situations: Causal-Structure Effects, Individual Differences, and the Dimensionality of Causes , 1985 .

[11]  W K Campbell,et al.  Among friends? An examination of friendship and the self-serving bias. , 2000, The British journal of social psychology.

[12]  L. Johnston,et al.  An investigation of the link between attributional judgments and stereotype-based judgments , 2000 .

[13]  Eliot R. Smith,et al.  Measurement and interpretation of situational and dispositional attributions , 1981 .

[14]  G. A. Mendelsohn,et al.  The actor-observer effect revisited: effects of individual differences and repeated social interactions on actor and observer attributions. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  Clifford R. Mynatt,et al.  Effects of controllable versus uncontrollable factors on responsibility attributions: A single-subject approach. , 1979 .

[16]  S. Solomon.  Measuring Dispositional and Situational Attributions , 1978 .

[17]  B. Malle,et al.  Which behaviors do people explain? A basic actor–observer asymmetry. , 1997 .

[18]  The perception of drinking roles by recovering problem drinkers. , 1981, Psychological medicine.

[19]  P. White.  Ambiguity in the internal/external distinction in causal attribution , 1991 .

[20]  S. West,et al.  Ubiquitous Watergate: An attributional analysis. , 1975 .

[21]  D M DeJoy,et al.  An examination of gender differences in traffic accident risk perception. , 1992, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[22]  N. Harré.  Risk Evaluation, Driving, and Adolescents: A Typology , 2000 .

[23]  Emilio Moyano-Díaz,et al.  Evaluation of Traffic Violation Behaviors and the Causal Attribution of Accidents in Chile , 1997 .

[24]  Don C. Locke,et al.  Reasons and other causes: Their role in attribution processes. , 1982 .

[25]  P. Lewis.  A NATURALISTIC TEST OF TWO FUNDAMENTAL PROPOSITIONS: CORRESPONDENCE BIAS AND THE ACTOR-OBSERVER HYPOTHESIS , 1995 .

[26]  Susan K. Green,et al.  A General Model of the Attribution Process , 1985 .

[27]  R. Nisbett,et al.  Situational Salience and Cultural Differences in the Correspondence Bias and Actor-Observer Bias , 1998 .

[28]  James A. McMartin,et al.  Perpetrator or victim? Effects of who suffers in an automobile accident on judgemental strictness , 1975 .

[29]  T. Herzog.  Automobile Driving as Seen by the Actor, the Active Observer, and the Passive Observer1 , 1994 .

[30]  T. Blass,et al.  A longitudinal study of the actor-observer attributional effect , 1990 .

[31]  E. E. Jones,et al.  A robust attribution error in the personality domain , 1981 .

[32]  B. Malle,et al.  How People Explain Behavior: A New Theoretical Framework , 1999, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[33]  E. Tanke,et al.  Determinants of Social Perception in a Naturalistic Setting. , 1980 .