Where to draw the line? Using movement data to inform protected area design and conserve mobile species

Protected areas (PAs) are a cornerstone of modern conservation. For PAs that are established to conserve mobile species, it is important to cover all the key areas regularly used by these species. However, zonation and boundaries of PAs have often been established with limited knowledge of animal movements, leaving the effectiveness of some PAs doubtful. We used radio tracking data to evaluate the extent to which two coastal PAs in mainland China encompassed the full range of habitats used by migratory shorebirds during non-breeding seasons. The core zone (highest restriction on human activities) of the Yalu Jiang Estuary National Nature Reserve (Liaoning) incorporated only 22 ± 6% (n = 34) of the diurnal home range (95% kernel density) of the endangered great knots Calidris tenuirostris. In contrast, the core zone of Chongming Dongtan (Shanghai) incorporated 73 ± 24% (n = 25) of the home range of dunlins Calidris alpina. During high tide, great knots in Yalu Jiang mostly occurred in the experimental zone (least restriction on human activities) or sometimes outside the PA boundary altogether, where the birds could face substantial threats. By investigating satellite tracking records, consulting published literature, interviewing local experts and mapping habitat composition in different coastal PAs in China, we found that wet artificial supratidal habitats were frequently used by migratory shorebirds but the coverage of these habitats in coastal PAs was low. These PA boundaries and/or zonations should be revised to conserve mobile species more effectively. With the increasing number of tracking studies, analysing the spatial relationships between PAs and the movement ranges of mobile species can increasingly inform the development of a representative, comprehensive PA network.

[1]  Habitat-dependent changes in vigilance behaviour of Red-crowned Crane influenced by wildlife tourism , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[2]  Jinwei Dong,et al.  Changes in area and number of nature reserves in China , 2019, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[3]  Kendall R. Jones,et al.  One-third of global protected land is under intense human pressure , 2018, Science.

[4]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[5]  Chunlüe Zhou,et al.  Impacts of tidal land reclamation in Bohai Bay, China: ongoing losses of critical Yellow Sea waterbird staging and wintering sites , 2011, Bird Conservation International.

[6]  Jianguo Liu,et al.  Coexistence between wildlife and humans at fine spatial scales , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  Zhijun Ma,et al.  Waterbird Population Changes in the Wetlands at Chongming Dongtan in the Yangtze River Estuary, China , 2009, Environmental management.

[8]  Zhijun Ma,et al.  Differentiating between stopover and staging sites: functions of the southern and northern Yellow Sea for long-distance migratory shorebirds , 2013 .

[9]  J. Watson,et al.  Replacing underperforming protected areas achieves better conservation outcomes , 2010, Nature.

[10]  J. Khim,et al.  Analysis of forty years long changes in coastal land use and land cover of the Yellow Sea: The gains or losses in ecosystem services. , 2018, Environmental pollution.

[11]  M. Barnes,et al.  Effectiveness of terrestrial protected areas in reducing habitat loss and population declines , 2013 .

[12]  J. Gils,et al.  Family Scolopacidae (sandpipers, snipes and phalaropes) , 1996 .

[13]  Jennifer A. Gill,et al.  Non-intertidal habitat use by shorebirds: a reflection of inadequate intertidal resources? , 2003 .

[14]  Peter J S Jones,et al.  Challenges in developing China's marine protected area system , 2009 .

[15]  D. Wilcove,et al.  The ecology and economics of shorebird conservation in a tropical human‐modified landscape , 2015 .

[16]  S. K. McFeeters.  The use of the Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI) in the delineation of open water features , 1996 .

[17]  R. Fuller,et al.  Biodiversity and China's new Great Wall , 2018 .

[18]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Conserving mobile species , 2014 .

[19]  R. Powell,et al.  An Evaluation of the Accuracy of Kernel Density Estimators for Home Range Analysis , 1996 .

[20]  A. Sinclair,et al.  Can parks protect migratory ungulates? The case of the Serengeti wildebeest , 2004 .

[21]  Henri Weimerskirch,et al.  At-sea distribution and scale-dependent foraging behaviour of petrels and albatrosses: a comparative study. , 2007, The Journal of animal ecology.

[22]  K. Tan,et al.  Aquaculture pond banks as high-tide roosts : What physical characteristics are more attractive to shorebirds? , 2016 .

[23]  Lawrence N. Hudson,et al.  Local biodiversity is higher inside than outside terrestrial protected areas worldwide , 2016, Nature Communications.

[24]  Navinder J. Singh,et al.  Linking Movement Ecology with Wildlife Management and Conservation , 2016, Front. Ecol. Evol..

[25]  Douglas W. Yu,et al.  Effectiveness of China's nature reserves in representing ecological diversity , 2011 .

[26]  G. Beauchamp,et al.  Flock size and human disturbance affect vigilance of endangered red-crowned cranes (Grus japonensis) , 2011 .

[27]  Nicholas E. Bruns,et al.  Dynamic conservation for migratory species , 2017, Science Advances.

[28]  R. Primack,et al.  A Chinese approach to protected areas: A case study comparison with the United States , 2017 .

[29]  Y. Verkuil,et al.  Prioritizing Migratory Shorebirds for Conservation Action on the East Asian-Australasian Flyway , 2014 .

[30]  T. Piersma,et al.  Roost availability may constrain shorebird distribution: Exploring the energetic costs of roosting and disturbance around a tropical bay , 2006 .

[31]  Zhijun Ma,et al.  The Habitat Use and Home Range Analysis of Dunlin (Calidris alpina) in Chongming Dongtan, China and their Conservation Implications , 2014, Wetlands.

[32]  S. Pimm,et al.  The effectiveness of the zoning of China's protected areas , 2016 .

[33]  Oriane W. Taft,et al.  SPACE USE, MIGRATORY CONNECTIVITY, AND POPULATION SEGREGATION AMONG WILLETS BREEDING IN THEWESTERN GREAT BASIN , 2002 .

[34]  Matthew E. Watts,et al.  Integrating research using animal‐borne telemetry with the needs of conservation management , 2017 .

[35]  Zhu Rongji,et al.  The State Council of the People's Republic of China Order No. 321 , 2011 .

[36]  Luis Roman Carrasco,et al.  Multiple habitat use by declining migratory birds necessitates joined‐up conservation , 2019, Ecology and evolution.

[37]  Yan-ping Huang,et al.  Evaluating the efficacy of zoning designations for protected area management , 2011 .

[38]  Steve Cherry,et al.  A COMPARISON OF CONFIDENCE INTERVAL METHODS FOR HABITAT USE-AVAILABILITY STUDIES , 1996 .

[39]  B. Silverman.  Density estimation for statistics and data analysis , 1986 .

[40]  Clément Calenge,et al.  The package “adehabitat” for the R software: A tool for the analysis of space and habitat use by animals , 2006 .

[41]  P. Smith,et al.  Population estimates of North American shorebirds, 2012 , 2012 .

[42]  Zhijun Ma,et al.  Shorebirds along the Yellow Sea coast of China face an uncertain future—a review of threats , 2016 .

[43]  R. Fuller,et al.  Protecting stopover habitat for migratory shorebirds in East Asia , 2015, Journal of Ornithology.

[44]  Navinder J. Singh,et al.  Conserving a moving target: planning protection for a migratory species as its distribution changes , 2011 .

[45]  Navinder J. Singh,et al.  Conservation when nothing stands still: moving targets and biodiversity offsets , 2013 .

[46]  Zhijun Ma,et al.  Simultaneous declines in summer survival of three shorebird species signals a flyway at risk , 2016 .

[47]  J. Ragle,et al.  IUCN Red List of Threatened Species , 2010 .

[48]  C. Calenge.  Home Range Estimation in R: the adehabitatHR Package , 2011 .

[49]  N. Davidson,et al.  The conservation and population status of the world’s waders at the turn of the millennium , 2006 .

[50]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Tracking the rapid loss of tidal wetlands in the Yellow Sea , 2014 .

[51]  Zhijun Ma,et al.  The importance of Yalu Jiang coastal wetland in the north Yellow Sea to Bar-tailed Godwits Limosa lapponica and Great Knots Calidris tenuirostris during northward migration , 2014, Bird Conservation International.

[52]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  The Ecological Performance of Protected Areas , 2008 .

[53]  J. Masero,et al.  IMPORTANCE OF THE SUPRATIDAL HABITATS FOR MAINTAINING OVERWINTERING SHOREBIRD POPULATIONS: HOW REDSHANKS USE TIDAL MUDFLATS AND ADJACENT SALTWORKS IN SOUTHERN EUROPE , 2001 .

[54]  Liana N. Joseph,et al.  Targeting Global Protected Area Expansion for Imperiled Biodiversity , 2014, PLoS biology.

[55]  Zhigang Jiang,et al.  Biodiversity conservation status in China's growing protected areas , 2017 .

[56]  Colin E. Studds,et al.  Rapid population decline in migratory shorebirds relying on Yellow Sea tidal mudflats as stopover sites , 2017, Nature Communications.

[57]  R. Clemens,et al.  Conservation without borders—solutions to declines of migratory shorebirds in the East Asian—Australasian Flyway , 2016 .

[58]  Yang Liu,et al.  Identification of coastal wetlands of international importance for waterbirds: a review of China Coastal Waterbird Surveys 2005–2013 , 2015, Avian Research.

[59]  A. Watkinson,et al.  Conflicts between biodiversity conservation and development in a biosphere reserve , 2009 .

[60]  P. Battley.  Shorebirds of the Yellow Sea: Importance, Threats and Conservation Status , 2004 .

[61]  Zhongliang Wang,et al.  Temporal-spatial variations and driving factors analysis of coastal reclamation in China , 2017 .

[62]  K. Tan,et al.  Persistent use of a shorebird staging site in the Yellow Sea despite severe declines in food resources implies a lack of alternatives , 2018 .