The relationship of total dissolved solids measurements to bulk electrical conductivity in an aquife

A recent conceptual model links higher bulk conductivities at hydrocarbon impacted sites to higher total dissolved solids (TDS) resulting from enhanced mineral weathering due to acids produced during biodegradation. In this study, we evaluated the above model by investigating the vertical distribution of bulk conductivity, TDS, and specific conductance in groundwater. The results showed higher TDS at contaminated locations consistent with the above model. Further, steep vertical gradients in bulk conductivity and TDS suggest vertical and spatial heterogeneity at the site. We observed that at fluid conductivities 40 mS/m, bulk conductivity increased with increasing fluid conductivity. However, at fluid conductivities >80 mS/m, bulk conductivities increased without a corresponding increase in fluid conductivity, resulting in a poor correlation between bulk conductivity and fluid conductivity for the contaminated samples. This suggests that electrolytic conductivity was not completely responsible for the observed variability in bulk conductivity. We suggest two possible reasons for the inverse relationship at low fluid conductivity and poor positive correlation at high fluid conductivity: (1) geochemical heterogeneity due to biological processes not captured at a scale comparable to the bulk conductivity measurement and (2) variability in the surface conductivity, consistent with a simple petrophysical model that suggests higher surface conductivity for contaminated sediments. We conclude that biodegradation processes can impact both electrolytic and surface conduction properties of contaminated sediments and these two factors can account for the higher bulk conductivities observed in sediments impacted by hydrocarbon.

[1]  J. Hem Study and Interpretation of the Chemical Characteristics of Natural Water , 1989 .

[2]  P. Sen,et al.  Electrical conduction in clay bearing sandstones at low and high salinities , 1988 .

[3]  W. Wood Guidelines for collection and field analysis of ground-water samples for selected unstable constituents , 1976 .

[4]  P. Bradley,et al.  Evidence for Enhanced Mineral Dissolution in Organic Acid‐Rich Shallow Ground Water , 1995 .

[5]  F. Legall Geochemical and Isotopic Characteristics Associated with High Conductivities in a Shallow Hydrocarbon-Contaminated Aquifier , 2002 .

[6]  Estella A. Atekwana,et al.  High Conductivities Associated With an LNAPL Plume Imaged by Integrated Geophysical Techniques , 1998 .

[7]  Estella A. Atekwana,et al.  In-situ apparent conductivity measurements and microbial population distribution at a hydrocarbon-contaminated site , 2004 .

[8]  G. R. Olhoeft,et al.  Low-frequency electrical properties. , 1985 .

[9]  J. Schön,et al.  CONTAMINATION INDICATIONS DERIVED FROM ELECTRICAL PROPERTIES IN THE LOW FREQUENCY RANGE1 , 1993 .

[10]  D. Dale Werkema,et al.  The Effects of LNAPL Biodegradation Products on Electrical Conductivity Measurements , 2001 .

[11]  Werkema,et al.  Geoelectrical response of an aged LNAPL plume: Implications for monitoring natural attenuation , 2002 .

[12]  D. Dale Werkema,et al.  Geophysical Investigation of Vadose Zone Conductivity Anomalies at a Hydrocarbon Contaminated Site: Implications for the Assessment of Intrinsic Bioremediation , 2002 .

[13]  M. E. Tuccillo,et al.  Progression of natural attenuation processes at a crude-oil spill site: I. Geochemical evolution of the plume. , 2001, Journal of contaminant hydrology.

[14]  A. P. Annan,et al.  Geophysical Monitoring Of A Controlled Kerosene Spill , 1993 .

[15]  Estella A. Atekwana,et al.  Investigations of geoelectrical signatures at a hydrocarbon contaminated site , 2000 .

[16]  J. Lloyd,et al.  Natural Inorganic Hydrochemistry in Relation to Groundwater: An Introduction , 1985 .

[17]  Anthony L. Endres,et al.  Investigating the geoelectrical response of hydrocarbon contamination undergoing biodegradation , 2003 .

[18]  William A. Sauck,et al.  A model for the resistivity structure of LNAPL plumes and their environs in sandy sediments , 2000 .

[19]  Robert P. Eganhouse,et al.  THE GEOCHEMICAL EVOLUTION OF LOW-MOLECULAR-WEIGHT ORGANIC ACIDS DERIVED FROM THE DEGRADATION OF PETROLEUM CONTAMINANTS IN GROUNDWATER , 1994 .

[20]  Robert P. Eganhouse,et al.  Transformation of Monoaromatic hydrocarbons to organic acids in anoxic groundwater environment , 1990 .

[21]  L. Slater,et al.  Effects of microbial processes on electrolytic and interfacial electrical properties of unconsolidated sediments , 2004 .

[22]  Induced Polarization (Ip) Measurements Of Soils From An Aged Hydrocarbon Contaminated Site , 2003 .

[23]  A. E. Greenberg,et al.  Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater : supplement to the sixteenth edition , 1988 .

[24]  G. E. Archie The electrical resistivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir characteristics , 1942 .

[25]  W. Sauck A Conceptual Model For The Geoelectrical Response Of Lnapl Plumes In Granular Sediments , 1998 .